The SDT explains that the closer the neighbourhood is to the central city (zone of transition), the higher the delinquency rate of crimes is located (Roman, 2004). The SAT was initially developed by the Chicago-school research of Shaw and McKay. They argued that there are three structural elements to why communities involve in high levels of crime rates. This includes ethnicity heterogeneous, high transience, and poverty (Sampson & Grovers, 1989). These three elements notably associate with the connection to high crime rates in Auckland CBD. The crime rates in Auckland are quite different compared to the Chicago location. Several surrounding areas of the Auckland CBD such as Ponsonby East, Eden Terrace, and Epsom North tend to show fewer rates of crime (Eden & Fyers, 2016). This is because these areas involve better economic status, less ethnic heterogeneity, and higher residential mobility. Rapid numbers of ethnic heterogeneity in a community are one of the three elements that trigger high crime rates in Auckland CBD. According to Tan (2016), approximately 53,000 ethnic migrants denoted to settle within the surrounding of Auckland city in 2016. Most migrants tend to choose to live in areas within the zone of transition as it is notably close to the CBD. The more clustered the neighbourhood has in relations of ethnic heterogeneity, the higher the delinquency of crime generates (Sampson & Groves, 1989). The increase of weak residential transience is another element which generates high crime rates in the Auckland CBD. Due to the growing population in the Auckland CBD, many people live in the property of rental apartments. Communities with many rental neighbours, result in higher crime rates. This is because the relationship between the neighbourhoods lacks social ties. A study suggested that the stronger the neighbourhood has towards the
The SDT explains that the closer the neighbourhood is to the central city (zone of transition), the higher the delinquency rate of crimes is located (Roman, 2004). The SAT was initially developed by the Chicago-school research of Shaw and McKay. They argued that there are three structural elements to why communities involve in high levels of crime rates. This includes ethnicity heterogeneous, high transience, and poverty (Sampson & Grovers, 1989). These three elements notably associate with the connection to high crime rates in Auckland CBD. The crime rates in Auckland are quite different compared to the Chicago location. Several surrounding areas of the Auckland CBD such as Ponsonby East, Eden Terrace, and Epsom North tend to show fewer rates of crime (Eden & Fyers, 2016). This is because these areas involve better economic status, less ethnic heterogeneity, and higher residential mobility. Rapid numbers of ethnic heterogeneity in a community are one of the three elements that trigger high crime rates in Auckland CBD. According to Tan (2016), approximately 53,000 ethnic migrants denoted to settle within the surrounding of Auckland city in 2016. Most migrants tend to choose to live in areas within the zone of transition as it is notably close to the CBD. The more clustered the neighbourhood has in relations of ethnic heterogeneity, the higher the delinquency of crime generates (Sampson & Groves, 1989). The increase of weak residential transience is another element which generates high crime rates in the Auckland CBD. Due to the growing population in the Auckland CBD, many people live in the property of rental apartments. Communities with many rental neighbours, result in higher crime rates. This is because the relationship between the neighbourhoods lacks social ties. A study suggested that the stronger the neighbourhood has towards the