Analysis Of Henrik Ibsen 's A Doll 's House Essay

1923 Words Oct 6th, 2015 8 Pages
There are major opposing moral views between characters in Henrik Ibsen 's dramatic play A Doll 's House. One moral trail leads to the conclusion that once someone commits a bad deed, there is no saving them; that person is now a low-life degenerate with no redemption in sight. The other side falls under a much more sympathetic view. They believe that the goodness of a person, whether it comes from who they once were, or who they are now, can help them overcome their mistakes and become truly good again. If brought to trial, through Torvald 's close-minded views on how people are, the sympathy of Krogstad 's children, Ms. Linde 's views on Krogstad 's character, and the words of Krogstad himself, the accusation of Krogstad 's moral degeneracy seems quite unreasonable. His crimes may never be fully forgiven. However, after presenting the reasoning behind his actions and the goodness in his heart, the heft of his punishment and the way society views him may never be the same. Before diving into his case, let us start by briefly outlining what all Nils Krogstad has been through. As a younger, married man, Krogstad was caught committing fraud. In other words, he forged signatures that were not his own to try and get more money and better his financial situation. After being caught, he would not admit to it. Now, Krogstad is a widowed father of multiple children, with no job to his name or good reputation among his peers. In his situation, Krogstad is being re-tried for forgery…

Related Documents