Analysis Of Happy National Apathy Day By Will Durst

Improved Essays
In his essay, “Happy National Apathy Day” published in The New York Times, Will Durst mocks the voter’s general lack of interest in voting. Durst 's sarcasm is evident throughout the essay as he picks fun at the voter 's excuses. Flaws that exist in the election system are also mocked by Durst. The election system is kept ineffective to keep it weak and not give the people power. Durst alludes to the fact that voters inactivity in the election process leads to problems in their community. Durst 's use of sarcasm points out to the audience that their apathy only hurts them in the end. It hurts them because they have no impact on the events that transpire with the government. A decrease in voter turnout is due to an increase in voter apathy toward …show more content…
Although Durst presents these ideas, it in no way means that he supports them. The ideas presented to the audience in the text they seem insignificant. Each of the reasons that Durst gives for not voting can be easily remedied. It shows how people are just lazy and are making up excuses not to vote. The list of excuses is the author using sarcasm. He uses a mocking tone to highlight further to his audience the lazy nature of their reasons. He exaggerates the instances to make them seem worse than they are. He plays into the audience 's preexisting prejudges of voting. By using the exaggeration of their reasons, Durst allows the audience to see that their reasons don 't hold water. They build up the excuses to have reasons not to vote. Another reason that Durst fields is, "None of your friends are voting" (Durst, 1998, pg. 1). Durst is saying that people chose not to vote because their friends aren 't voting. He is saying that these adults are playing into the concept of peer pressure. Durst again mocks the voter with sarcasm. Durst …show more content…
When voters decide not to vote, they don 't get to influence the community in which they live. Durst gives a vivid description of some of the things that could change as a result of the general disinterest by voters. Durst uses everyday experiences to relate to the audience. He uses the examples of libraries closing down, Medicare failing, mass transits closing down, and neighborhood recreation centers closing down (Durst, 1998, pg.1). The author reveals some of the consequences of being inactive in government. He reveals it in a casual tone. This mocks the tone of the audience. He takes the lazy attitude of the audience, to show them the impacts of their lazy attitude. This also shows how not voting would impact your everyday life. It would get rid of things that you use every day. Or it would add things to make your life harder. By using these examples, he shows the audience that little aspects of their life will eventually be impacted if they continue to be apathetic. This portion is used to persuade the audience that their actions in the present will affect them

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Effects Of Filibuster

    • 1468 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The filibuster ignored the democratic value of rule of law. This occurs because the filibuster impairs policy making which leads the government to be less responsive towards their voters and citizens. Due to this, the voters do not care about the political competition. This happens because the voters elect a representative to make changes that will benefit them, but if a filibuster occurs, the bill can get killed and no change would be made. This makes the voters angry with the political system and can lead them to stop caring about the political process.…

    • 1468 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It don’t make any difference to me”’ (Hemingway 2), makes it seem like it is actually the other way around. This represents a sort of rebellion against the social class that Dick is trying to make, yet the only one hurt in the end is himself because Henry removes him from the job. Not only did Dick’s rude comments not help him reach his goal of showing his dissatisfaction with the social…

    • 1075 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    They would like to do something for the child. But there is nothing they can do” ( 406-7). This passage is meant to elicit anger from the reader by describing the citizens as feeling powerless when the audience clearly knows that any one of these people could release the child but chooses not to. Most visitors go back to their homes with grief but a select few simply leave the town. Le Guin does not elaborate when she writes of this: “They go on”…

    • 1097 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Vote To Vote Analysis

    • 1144 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Within present day society there is an underlying conflict over democracy and whether people should vote or not. The commonality between these sources is represented by this underlying conflict. As time progresses, it is evident that voter turnout has drastically decreased, because people these days do not have the motivation to pay attention to politics, or do not know which candidate to choose. Source one, a political cartoon, emphasizes the apathy that average citizens within society have towards voting. The woman is most likely asking the man for who he is going to vote for, for an upcoming election.…

    • 1144 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Before going in to detail about the negative effect a bystander has on the world one must understand what indifference is. Indifference is the lack of interest, knowing something and really not caring enough to do anything in order to change it! Wiesel explains that this is the worst thing in the country, and it has never been fixed. Wiesel acknowledges that indifference is temping and seductive in our society. Then he goes about his speech by putting down the people who are indifferent.…

    • 1015 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Reality Tv Show Analysis

    • 748 Words
    • 3 Pages

    A. A personal trouble can be defined as a hardship faced by an individual in society due to their own character or temperament. For instance, alcoholism is not due to powers that lie outside the individual but characteristics this one individual pertains that makes him or her addicted to alcohol. In regards, to this example of alcoholism it is not good thing because it leads to a cascade of negative occurrences like losing your job, and damage to your liver. Some examples of this show are the protagonist “Carl” hates to travel because of ignorance and only caring for his own culture, hence, when it becomes his job to travel he turn the experience into a negative one for others ultimately having people ridicule him.…

    • 748 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Bradbury also states that technology oppresses society, and harms the community; yet they do not care. Bradbury tries to say that society is detached from one another, and people no longer care about anything but themselves. People are less involved in each others lives and many lack emotion. In the book the reader can see that people no longer care about one another, or contain many feelings. Bradbury wrote, “They would have killed me,…

    • 1323 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    By expecting the audience to trust him, his lack of ethos in his article leaves doubt in the mind of his reader making them ask “okay, why should we trust you?”. The author also does not use any jargon that is in association with making his point he only uses lower level diction with the exception of one or two…

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To his coworkers, Bartleby is seen as lazy and difficult to work with because of what they perceive as his lack of motivation. “’Nippers,’ said [the narrator], ‘what do you think of it?’ ‘I think I should kick him out of the office.’” (Melville 1491). Due to Bartleby’s passive resistance, he is seen as an outcast or “luny” as Ginger Nut later states because he does not believe in participating in anything that he does not feel is…

    • 2083 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Paradoxes are used to show corruption and irony in the society to the characters and the readers. The evocation of thought rises when the few people who escaped the hypnotic effect of technology begin to ask the question ‘why?’. The immorality in the society becomes apparent to Montag when he meets Clarisse. Clarisse herself is a paradox as she is deemed antisocial because she does not fit into the society where everyone is hypnotized by the ‘parlour walls’ and no one asks questions. However, by her definition,“Social to me means talking to you about things like this.” (Bradbury…

    • 1323 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays