H. J Mccloskey Analysis

In H.J McCloskey’s article, he made clear to his readers that the major dispute to theism is the presences of evil in the world. This essay will provide a response to many of the arguments McCloskey made and hopefully offer some clarifications and point out some issues with other objections to the topics of evolution, indisputable, issues of morality, and the subject matter that questions the existence of God, which he also has expressed in his article (McCloskey). The arguments were meant to be used together to provide some insight on the subject matter.
The first argument that is presented in the article is the Cosmological argument. This argument attempts to infer the existence of God from the existence of the universe. In McCroskey statement …show more content…
This argument does provide some small amount of perception to the knowledge of God but does not mention any attributes about God. This argument also gives some small amount of the knowledge of God but does not mention any attributes.
McCloskey has expressed some objection to the Teleological argument. He states one can reject the argument of design because of the premises that there is no evidence of design and purpose. He points to evolution theory and claims that there seem to be nothing. Basically, no evidence to prove thus compelled to believe there is no such thing as indisputable examples of proof. The Teleological argument argues that the universe displays nessences. It gives insight on the characteristics of the universe. According to Dr. Drew Forman in his video discussion stated Nessence is that which has complexity, order, and purpose in its ability to be. …show more content…
Atheism values and arguments are inconstant statements and are a dehumanizing view. Filled with inconstant conclusion, and equivocations. McCloskey view of morality is a cultural view. This view is very different around the world and these views change therefore they are not constant and could change frequently based on personal experiences and beliefs. In an article written by William Lane Craig titled, ‘The Absurdity of Life without God’, he presented numerous arguments of Atheist Significance, Moral Motivation, the Atheistic meaning of Morality and Atheistic Purpose. His argument was, if there is no God then we have no reason what so ever to be moral then we are free to act without being held accountable. What would be in place to establish a definition for morality that is solid, concrete and unchangeable? God is the creator and giving humans the gift of free will has established the definition of morality and set bounders for his creation to operate within. Look at the atheistic meaning of the existence of God. Life without God has no value. Thus, what is the value of Death or Love? Human life would be the same as an animal. Everything we do in life would be meaningless. Why have a funeral honoring a person who has passed