His ethos in the argument does a great job at persuasion. He says that he wants the GMO Golden Rice to help save 250 million kids worldwide from malnutrition. This sounds like a noble deed to accomplish for the world. His pathos that he uses helps further his point by making the audience pity the kids with “hidden hunger.” When using logos he uses statistics and direct quotes from other professionals. He needs to provide more details on how to incentivize companies. One of the underlying assumptions this article is based off of is that there will be no negative side effects from the introduction of the new rice because could have many unforeseen problems for the ecosystems it is planted
His ethos in the argument does a great job at persuasion. He says that he wants the GMO Golden Rice to help save 250 million kids worldwide from malnutrition. This sounds like a noble deed to accomplish for the world. His pathos that he uses helps further his point by making the audience pity the kids with “hidden hunger.” When using logos he uses statistics and direct quotes from other professionals. He needs to provide more details on how to incentivize companies. One of the underlying assumptions this article is based off of is that there will be no negative side effects from the introduction of the new rice because could have many unforeseen problems for the ecosystems it is planted