Analysis Of Get A Dog Get Rid Of Guns By Molly Ivins

Improved Essays
Does someone who shoplifts a candy bar get sentenced to death? Do American people get thrown in prison for practicing their religion? Is it illegal to speak your mind? The answer to these questions is obviously no. These are basic human rights given to us by the constitution and to take these away would be unconstitutional. This is the same for the right to own and carry guns as well. However, Molly Ivins, author of the article “Get a Knife, Get a Dog, Get Rid of Guns”, argues that it is perfectly logical to strip the American people of this basic right and claims that guns should be banned. I strongly disagree with her stance as I believe in giving the power back to the people and letting them have their rights. Although I support the idea that there should be extra regulation on guns to prevent them from getting into the hands of criminals or those who are not mentally …show more content…
Although this is true for most of America, there are still parts of this nation where guns are necessary for survival. In some parts of Alaska, for example, many people are forced to hunt for and store their own food for the winter because they live so far away from a town or city. Although many people are not forced to hunt for survival, many people still love to hunt; not because they love to kill but because they know where their meat is coming from. Many stores carry meat that is tainted with steroids, pesticides and antibiotics and aren’t required by law to tell the customer of this. Hunting eliminates most, if not every, possibility of the meat being tainted with these chemicals and is actually healthier because of this. Also, there are many parts of America, such as the Alaskan mountains, are quite dangerous and filled with wild animals. To take away the resident’s guns is to take away their safety from these potentially dangerous

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    “Get a Knife, Get a Dog, But Get Rid of Guns” by Molly Ivins was written to show gun holders a simple alternative of self-defense. Ivin’s point is very clear that guns control laws should be banned, or at least restricted. To get her point across, she uses techniques like sarcastic humor and examples of politics to help justify her personal beliefs on gun control; guns are destructive and should to be regulated, better yet illegal. In order to ease into her argument, Ivin starts her piece with a bit of humor. She mentions, “In the 1st place, you have to catch up with someone in order to stab him.…

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In ¨Get a knife, Get a dog, but Get rid of guns”, published in 1993, by Molly Ivins in the Fort worth Star-Telegram, she writes about the second amendment and says that firearms should be for people in a well trained militia. Ivins supports her claim by using quote from the amendment. The authors purpose is to persuade people that firearms are dangerous in non emergency uses. Ivins emphasizes a zealous tone in order to appeal her audience to teach people who use guns the precautionary uses of guns.…

    • 89 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I understand the term has been defined and redefined over the years but seriously not every person should have this right. There are those who suffer from mental illness like the mother in Texas who shot her two teenage daughters killing them and in turn, she was killed by the police. This is not to mention felons, those being investigated by F.B.I and Homeland security, etc. Like many of the recent shootings, these are people who should have never been allowed to own any type of gun or handgun.…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    United States is a nation where individual rights are guaranteed and practiced to some extent. For example, the amendments created by the United States government have raised questions and doubts in many individual’s minds where an answer is nowhere to be found. As stated in 2nd amendment “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed.” This has become a controversial issue all around the United States of America. Although some people may believe that guns should be banned, in reality the right to be armed should not be ceased because it provides protection and it reveals to the American Citizens that their rights are guaranteed.…

    • 1132 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The United States is a democratic country, so American should have a right to own a gun to use in self-defense. Also, the gun right can limit the power of the government because the Founding Father does not want to give too much power to the government, so the people would not live under the…

    • 170 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    People used guns for self- survival many, many years ago. Now people use guns to kill other citizens and cause harm. These shooters do this to hide something, “get even” with others, try and support themselves, or ovoid jail. Of course, this is never the way to go. The only reason to use a gun is to hunt, but even hunting isn’t the right choice sometimes because some hunters shoot and kill endangered animals every day.…

    • 663 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Americans are also 10 times more likely to be killed by guns than other people in other countries according to CBS news. Not only do humans get killed by guns, but also innocent animals. Many people go hunting for sport and don’t realize how many lives they are taking away. This is why the second amendment should be changed. According to Everytown Research, “On an average day, 93 Americans are killed with guns” and “On average there are nearly 12,000 gun homicides a year in the United States.”…

    • 609 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Russ Shafer-Landau provides us with an article by Jeff McMahan in order to give us an analytical argument on gun control. Jeff McMahan, in his article Why Gun Control Isn’t Enough, discusses why he believes guns should not simply be controlled in the United States, rather they should be banned. McMahan makes the case that gun ownership, in its entirety, is dangerous and illogical. Through several examples and through his own reasoning, McMahan hopes to convince the reader that the only way forward on the topic of ‘guns’ in the United States is to completely ban civilians from owning traditional firearms, from the ground up. Through my counter-argument, I intend to show that while McMahan’s argument is versed well on intent, it is mostly normative,…

    • 1297 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Firearm debates have run rampant in the past few years, people are starting to feel safe in their place in society. Unknowingly devising their own downfall, allowing others to choose their gun rights without a say. In her op-ed piece, "Get a Knife, Get a Dog, but Get Rid of Guns" Molly Ivins argues that guns are not protected by the second amendment; and that you 're well within your means to defend yourself without them. I whole heartily disagree with Ivins ' views on guns, and believe guns are a fundamental right and necessity for today 's society. I believe everyone has a right to their opinion, and if it 's supported by factual information can 't be denied.…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The director of the documentary Bowling for Columbine Michael Moore, portrays many of today’s issues in the United States of America. American’s have a hard time with thinking things through and trying to find the root to major problems, thus resulting into a total disaster. The United States has the most gun related crimes in the world. Michael Moore tries to find the root to this problem which is seemingly unknown. Citizens and the media tend to make generalizations that try to single out people or other things as if they are the problem to the gun related crimes, but most of these generalizations are logical fallacies that are irrelevant to the actual problem.…

    • 1499 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In America there practically is a mass shooting every day according to a mass shooting tracker. Where more than four people die in one incident. This is not even taking into account the number of accidents and gun related violence that result in the death of less than four people. America cannot go on like this. The very things we buy to protects ourselves are the things that our killing us.…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay Against Gun Control

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages

    “There is no possible way to extinguish the huge supply of guns in the United States alone.” ”6” There is just too many guns. “If a nationwide gun confiscation program was attempted, they would have to confiscate over 350 million firearms.” ”1” There would be a lot of guns that would not…

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why Should Guns Be Banned

    • 1051 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In America, there is a growing perception that guns are: they are harmful, they kill, and they commit crimes, and so most guns should be banned. But, how can a gun kill or commit crimes; it is not a living thing, it is a tool. With the use of guns, America has grown to be a strong and independent country throughout history. The push to ban guns will only keep guns away from law abiding citizens since criminals, by nature, do not follow laws and respect the gun free zones. The banning of guns in America should end.…

    • 1051 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In conclusion I feel that everyone is entitled to their 2nd amendment but what will make everyone safe is the heavy background checks to make sure you are not a potential deadly person. Even if you tried to wipe out all the guns in America there would still be the black market or even private sales of illegal firearms. Now this is a question for you, who kills people? The gun or the HUMAN behind the…

    • 818 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Guns are designed to kill people. They should be made illegal because the only reason a person would need a gun is to either kill an animal or a human. Some may argue that the 2nd amendment protects their rights as citizens to own a firearm but it was also created 224…

    • 918 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays