Utilitarianism And Integrity Analysis

Improved Essays
Utilitarianism and Integrity
Utilitarianism is the idea that people should make decisions based on the greater happiness of everyone, and forget their own wants and needs. The first example where utilitarianism conflicts with character is the one Bernard Williams gives of George; George is a struggling out of work dad and husband and is presented with a job in biological warfare. The kind of work involved does not align with his values; his wife is the only one working and straining to support and feed their young kids. Should he take the job and sacrifice his values for his family’s sake or deny the job and stand his ground with integrity while his wife and kids continue to suffer? The second example would be of Jim; he is a young man traveling
…show more content…
If people were able to plan every experience they wanted for a span of two years of pure happiness and fulfillment, would they truly be missing out on real life? In a way the “experience machine” is like utilitarianism; utilitarian people live basing their decisions on others happiness and forget their own views and morals, almost trying to live in a perfectly blissful world. In the experience machine, a person would most likely only ever choose events that were pleasing, and they would never get to make difficult decisions that reveal their true character. Humanity would not truly make a difference in the REAL world since people would never be faced with adversity in this dream land causing them to not really know what their true values, or weaknesses were and in the same way, when a person conforms to utilitarianism, they give up the things that make them who they are, their values, morals, …show more content…
Even though George needed to help his struggling family, taking a job that required him to go against his morals was not a good one. Physically, he would be living comfortably, but when he laid down each night, he would struggle knowing that he was not living his truth. The same goes for Jim’s incident, if anyone were to be put into the position of killing one and saving themselves plus 19 others, or just accepting that they may die, many would choose the latter. If these men were to go along with consequentialism, they would lose a part of themselves, one day at a time. Jim’s guilt of knowing he killed someone to save his own life would eat at him, as well as George’s decision to actively work somewhere he did not approve of. Consequentialism wants people to put aside any sense of self they have and do things for the greater good, but clearly in Jim and George’s situation, consequentialism is not the way to go. Consequentialism is right in wanting to make decisions for the greater happiness, but not when it comes to these intense situations. Though consequentialism SOUNDS appealing, it is not a realistic view, in some instances it may work to better a situation, but not in

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Utilitarianism is a system of morality that generates us with what the most useful thing to do in different situations and outcomes Q: What are key features of ethical egoism? A: Ethical egoism is a doctrine that states all persons ought to act from their own self-interest. It is driven by what is your own self-interest and no one else’s influences. Q: What are the differences between utilitarianism and ethical egoism?…

    • 335 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    But these actions are ones that individuals ought to do for the good of everyone; although one is degrading their integrity, they are upholding outcomes that are necessary for the good. On the other hand, not acting against moral beliefs can produce negative consequences that one is responsible for that erodes personal integrity. In Williams’ example of George not wanting to accept his job offer to work for chemical and biological warfare research to support his family, George choosing his morality maintains his integrity, but does not produce a consequence of good for his family or for someone who will receive the job with higher aspirations in the field (664). In a utilitarian response, it would require George to take the job. But based on Williams’ claims, he should not because the moral implications of working a job would degrade his integrity by essentially aiding in the killing of numerous people (664-665).…

    • 1213 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Utilitarianism is a normative philosophy of ethics that has been around since the late eighteenth century. It earliest proponents were Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill. The general idea of utilitarianism is that there is no morality measurement except results. So, when one is deciding how to act, the only thing that matters is what the results of the actions are. Utilitarianism says that the actions that cause the most happiness and the least amount of unhappiness or pain are the moral acts.…

    • 1678 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are not a lot of instances, in which dying is a better option than the pain one is currently going through. We know the possible pleasures that await us, and these outweigh the current struggles or problems that we may be facing. Looking at how these affect our actions, though, is a way to think about why Utilitarianism is flawed. Just as each human holds their own life important, they too can be thought of as holding their decisions as important. Bernard Williams, in “Utilitarianism and Integrity”, recognizes this concept.…

    • 1809 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Utilitarianism is a branch of metaethics that focuses on the ideas of consequences, self interest, and unbiasedness. Instead of determining if an action is moral through the immediate effects, Utilitarianism skimps over the short term and instead focuses on the long term effects of actions. Actions are no longer based on intention but, rather the overall effects from those actions determines if the parent event was morally good or bad. Utilitarianism also emphasizes the idea that an individual’s well being trumps all moral responsibilities, if a person has to steal food to eat then by utilitarianist standards this person is being morally correct despite his obvious theft. This is advantage to the ideology as it allows for a greater sense of…

    • 1026 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Utilitarianism

    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The most recent Presidential election in the United States recently came to a wrap, widely being considered one of the most ridiculous elections of all time. When it was announced that the two Presidential finalists were Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton, people all around the world were shocked. With Donald Trump having no experience in politics, and Hillary Clinton previously having been in a political position, but landing herself in hot water for deleting thousands of emails, it seemed that America was almost certainly doomed. With the controversial nature of the candidates, many America citizens decided to remove themselves from the equation completely by not voting at all. If I was an American citizen, I would have done the same thing.…

    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Imagine a world where you could choose your destiny with the click of a button. You could have any experience, anytime, anywhere. With the only exception being to give up the life you are currently living. Would you choose to have your own life experiences? Or would you create your own destiny in order to fulfill your desires of living a perfect life?…

    • 1052 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    For many years there has been a debate between the opposing philosophical frameworks consequentialism and deontology. Some could argue that consequentialisms maxim of "the ends justify the means” as the determinant for a moral action may be inconsistent with other important aspects of value such as rights and allegiance. Others may argue that deontology is simply too restrictive and independent of the context in which it could be applied to. Although these two philosophical frameworks have various pros and cons associated with them, I will argue that consequentialism is the most flexible of the two frameworks. Consequentialism portrays right action in terms of intrinsic value, stating that the “action is right if…its consequences would be…

    • 1347 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In his piece, Utilitarianism, Integrity and Responsibility, Bernard Williams critiques utilitarianism by examining two examples through a utilitarian perspective. Based on his analysis, Williams claims that utilitarianism doesn’t allow for integrity because the agent is not only responsible for his actions, but for those of others as well. The first example focuses on George, an expert chemist, who can’t find a job due to his poor health. This causes strain on his wife and children. A colleague offers to use his influence to get George a job at a laboratory studying chemical and biological warfare.…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The difference between Nonconsequential and Consequential Theories is that the Nonconsequential theory does not entirely depend on the consequences to measure the goodness or righteousness, while the Consequential Theory relies on the consequences to measure if the action is good or right. An example to define Utilitarianism is this scenario: Becca is a bank teller at a well known bank. One day, there is a robbery.…

    • 360 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Utilitarian Ethical Theory

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Among the three ethical theories studied in class, the utilitarian theory can be used in explaining ethical implications of Face Recognition technology. Chonko, Larry (1-5) describes various ethical theories. However, Chonko Larry (2) asserts that utilitarian ethical theory is based on the ability of an individual to predict the significance of an action. Action in this case study is using Facial Recognition technology in iPhone X. According to the theory, an option which results in the greatest benefit to most individuals is the one who is ethically right and correct.…

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Virtue theory asks what are the characteristics of a good person and from these traits they begin to ask questions about morality. Virtues are subject but not limited to courage, generosity, kindness, and etc. This theory is essentially a form of character development as its purpose. Consequentialist look at the actions and the consequences that follow the action as a means of morality.…

    • 322 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Bernard Williams’s example of the moral dilemma involving Jim killing the one individual to save 19 is an interesting one that provokes much thought and it is a decision that utilitarian followers would find quite easy. Utilitarian’s subscribe to the view that everything that you do or do not do should be for the sake of maximizing total happiness, or utility. But individuals who subscribe to a different moral philosophy could potentially have a myriad of ethical concerns associated with making such a decision. In this paper, I will explain the moral dilemma that is presented in Bernard Williams’s piece, hypothesize what the utilitarian would do in that situation, why they would choose to do that. I will also demonstrate why Williams’s dilemma provides valid evidence to reject utilitarianism on the grounds that it weakens a person’s integrity, sense of responsibility, and their moral character.…

    • 1282 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Rule Utilitarianism

    • 977 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Stealing to survive How would a utilitarian respond to the dilemma of stealing to survive? Utilitarianism is a normative theory and a teleological approach to morality. The theory states that motives do not matter and that the consequences are the only thing that should make you carry out an act. The foundation of utilitarianism is the Greatest Happiness Principle which has three sections.…

    • 977 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In ethics there are hundreds of theories that try to define morality. Utilitarianism is one of these theories that seems to simply be that if one is being moral, their decisions will create the greatest amount of happiness for everyone (Clark & Poortenga, 2003). This theory has been defended by many, including Jeremey Bentham, who popularized quantitative utilitarianism, and John Stuart Mill, who believed that utilitarianism was actually qualitative (Wilkens, 2011). While utilitarianism as a whole can seem clear-cut, John Stuart Mill’s theory of qualitative utilitarianism has many ethical problems, and is too simple to accurately address every moral decision. Utilitarianism is a fairly popular viewpoint when it comes to morality because it…

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays