Analysis Of Gary Wills '' Our Moloch'

Superior Essays
Gary Wills’ “Our Moloch” is a contentious and aggressive article that provides an interesting and unique opinion on the issue of guns in America. It is proposed that the gun itself functions like a god within American culture, and is unquestionable. According to the article, the great god Gun is worshipped like the God of Law/Order, Patriotism, or one of Free Market in today’s society. The most significant point of this essay is Wills’ exaggerated difference between America’s love towards guns and the devotion of the god Moloch. In particular, Wills’ diction at times seems to be too smart and more sophisticated rather than actually considering how much it can affect members of a society when individuals have the advantage to use those weapons. In my perspective, the two most specific aspects that are examples of Wills’ overly sophisticated writing include when he refers to the gun as being an “object of reverence” and when he suggests the gun “guarantees life and safety and freedom” (par. 3).

Our Moloch” refers to the ancient Canaanite god whose devotion encompassed the sacrifice of children. A sign, indicating we are living in a “deeply
…show more content…
Throughout this article, Wills compares America’s dependency towards guns to the worship of the idol Moloch to which individuals sacrifice their children. He is able to blame our worshiping and the influence it has on us as individuals as we order our lives around that prayer. Wills concludes his thoughts by demonstrating guns “destroy the reasoning process” (par. 6), delivers our leaders helpless before its demands, and corrupts our reading of spiritual documents. Although gun control measures in America want to protect law-abiding citizens, they are unsuccessful in carefully identifying and avoiding high-risk individuals in possessing and using guns. Thus, these gun control measures have a risk of placing a negative effect on gun crimes in

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Katrina Herrera Mrs. Clark AP English 3 08 February 2018 Argumentative Essay Final Draft: Gun Control Gun control is one of the most controversial topics in American politics. More than one-third of Americans in the United States own firearms in their households. It is estimated that more than thirty-thousand people are shot each year due to murders, accidents, police intervention, suicide attempts and suicide. Gun control laws are not strict enough for the safety of our society. The purchase and possession of firearms should be banned in order to prevent potential public shootings, protect the environment, and decrease suicide and death rates.…

    • 1301 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    And of course, mass shooting victims account for a tiny percentage of the Americans gunned down every year. A majority of children killed by guns are killed by accident, or by their own hand, or by adults, with weapons legally obtained by adults.”. Rosenthal points out that majority of guns that have been used to commit an act of violence was obtained legally, so again the purposed solutions to gun violence will only amount to a minor change to in gun…

    • 990 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The article “Guns a Loaded Argument” by Paul Rosenzweig argues his interpretation of the popular controversy over gun laws in the United States. The author Paul Rosenzweig is an adjunct professor of law at George Mason University. He is also the senior legal research colleague in the Center for Legal and Judicial Studies at The Heritage Foundation, the website in which the article is available. The Heritage Foundation is a research and informative institution that publicizes conservative policy topics that support the principle ideas that the foundation stands for. The author has written this article for a mainly conservative audience of readers to allow people more insight into the intricate issues of gun control.…

    • 1375 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this New York Times article Erik Eckholm uses mass shootings such as the Columbine, Virginia tech and Sandy Hook shootings to demonstrate the need for stricter gun laws. The writing of this article was sparked by the most recent shooting in Roseburg, Oregon. By using these tragedies along with very supportive statistics he is able to persuade the reader to believe that the current laws and restrictions simply are not enough. 90 people a day are killed by guns, two thirds of that statistic are suicides. This goes to show that Eckholm understands that sometimes “Guns don’t kill people, people kill people.”…

    • 709 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Roth concluded that “Several strategies may succeed in reducing gun murders, but rigorous evaluations are needed to ascertain their effectiveness. Among these are reducing firearm lethality (e.g., by banning certain types of ammunition), reducing unauthorized use (e.g., through combination locks on triggers, or sentence enhancements for burglary and fencing violations that involve guns), and educating the public about safe use and storage” (Roth, 2007). He concludes that not gun banning, but reform related to education and pursuing the criminality of illegal arms trade will curb gun violence in the United States. His overall conclusion from his findings is: “Where there is local support, priority should be given to three enforcement objectives: disrupting illegal gun markets; reducing juveniles ' access to guns; and close cooperation between the police and the community to set priorities and enforce laws” (Roth, 2007). Only by working together can the government and its citizens in the U.S. aim to curve violent crime.…

    • 2061 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gun control has been extremely controversial in society for years. In the essay “Just Take Away Their Guns,” James Q. Wilson argues his view on stricter gun control laws. He writes, “Legal restraints on the lawful purchase of guns will have little effect on the illegal use of guns” (Wilson, 1994, p.125). He backs up his statement with the statistics that 5/6 of handguns used in crimes are either stolen or purchased privately. With this being said, he displays that increasing legal restraints on purchasing guns will have little to no effect on the use of guns to commit crimes.…

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gun control in America is a significant issue, with an average of 91 gun related deaths per day, it is a matter that can no longer be ignored. Being controversial in its nature, author Phoebe Maltz Bovy doesn 't hesitate to shed light on her opinion on the affair. In her article “It’s Time to Ban Guns. Yes, All of Them.” Bovy is quick to state that all guns are bad regardless of their purpose or the respective owner, that they’re all nothing more than dangerous machines.…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Society has been split into two over whether or not guns should be banned, but there needs to be a solution where both parties can be happy. Anti-gun advocates present reasoning why guns should be banned. McMahan’s main two arguments of why guns should be banned: one, guns in the community creates a more dangerous environment; and two, the police have less of a power to protect citizens when society has guns (Shafer-Landau, The Ethical Life (EL) 390). McMahan explains that communities are not going to be free of crimes with more people carrying around guns, because criminals will be more prepared, efficient, and quicker to grab and shoot their target (Shafer-Landau, EL 392-392). People with guns will be safer than people without guns, because they do not have a gun to protect themselves.…

    • 1631 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Russ Shafer-Landau provides us with an article by Jeff McMahan in order to give us an analytical argument on gun control. Jeff McMahan, in his article Why Gun Control Isn’t Enough, discusses why he believes guns should not simply be controlled in the United States, rather they should be banned. McMahan makes the case that gun ownership, in its entirety, is dangerous and illogical. Through several examples and through his own reasoning, McMahan hopes to convince the reader that the only way forward on the topic of ‘guns’ in the United States is to completely ban civilians from owning traditional firearms, from the ground up. Through my counter-argument, I intend to show that while McMahan’s argument is versed well on intent, it is mostly normative,…

    • 1297 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Guns Laws Must Be Changed The debate on new gun legislation at the federal and national levels is roaring topic in today’s American society. On one side of the argument, “gun lovers” constantly make mention of the second amendment and how the law protects the rights of Americans. On the other side of the argument, Americans expecting gun reforms argue new and clearer laws will be preferable for the future of America. Nevertheless, on both sides the truth of the matter is in the statistical evidence of gun violence and gun accessibility.…

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    With less than 5 percent of the world’s population, the United States holds about 35- 50 percent of the world’s civilian owned guns (Masters, 2016). In reviewing America’s history, this statistic may not seem so striking since guns have always played a major role in society. However, due to the recent events regarding gun violence and an increase in terrorism, the topic of gun control has become problematic for American. When discussing gun control there are mainly two views.…

    • 1570 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In “Confessions of a Liberal Gun Owner”, author James Cronin explains why he, despite being a liberal, believes in and exercises his gun ownership rights. This essay, in particular, is quite intriguing due to the fact a liberal is supporting the second amendment. The title alone draws in a diverse crowd because it is somewhat paradoxical in today's divided political spectrum. The personal crisis that leads to the author’s support of gun ownership enlightens and resonates with nearly all readers. In “Confessions of a Liberal Gun Owner”, Cronin successfully presents a persuasive argument for firearms that is convincing to both liberals and conservatives alike.…

    • 1109 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Columnist Nicholas Kristof wrote an article titled “Our Blind Spot about Guns,” which was published in The New York Times in 2014. In the article’s context, he “argues that if guns and their owners were regulated in the same way that cars and their drivers are, thousands of lives could be saved each year” (Kristof 161). He incorporates multiple statistics in his essay, provides us with insights from the opposing side, and compares the issue of gun control to one that occurred a century ago: vehicle control. Just in the first two paragraphs, Kristof does not cease to use startling statistics that he is sure will grab our attention. He brings to light the issue of 1921 when vehicle regulations were non-existent which, therefore, contributed to the issue of high fatality rates.…

    • 710 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gun Control is Not the Solution Increased Gun Control in the United States is absurd, useless, and unnecessary. In order to increase safety all throughout the United States time and effort must not be spent towards limiting gun owners of their rights. The tragic rash of school, religious, and workplace shootings has turned up the heat on the public conversation about guns. In nearly all of these cases gun laws would not have stopped the shooters from obtaining a firearm.…

    • 1304 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the essay, “Just Take Away Their Guns”, James Q. Wilson a Management and Policy professor at UCLA, argues that legally owned guns are not the problem, in fact the real problem lies with society ignoring the usage of illegal guns. The purpose of this essay is to convey to society that gun crimes can be stopped before a shot is fired, that it does not entitle a huge stack of forms at the local gun store. Wilson effectively argues that legally owned guns are necessary for citizens to protect themselves, reasonable police frisks should be in place to stop illegal gun use before the crime is committed and ultimately guns agitate the situation making crimes worse. The authors credibility and logical appeal are overall effective, in spite of the lack of emotional appeal or connection to the audience. Despite the absence of Pathos, the author conveys an adequate amount of logic, which carries the paper to an effective and persuasive conclusion.…

    • 1103 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays