Analysis Of Early Induction And Augmentation Of Labor

The art of medicine has made substantial improvements throughout history. While most of these improvements are for the better, some intrude on the natural processes that do not typically require interventions, for example, childbirth. Yes, there are instances in which medical intervention is necessary, but for the healthy woman and fetus, early induction and augmentation of labor is unnecessary. It has been found that this process can increase complications and pose several risks for both the mother and her baby. For the woman, induced labor either medical or non-medical may increase the risks for postpartum hemorrhages. This increases the risk for blood transfusion, hysterectomy, placenta implantation abnormalities in future pregnancies, a longer hospital stay, further hospital re-admissions, and even death (Non-Medically Indicated Induction and Augmentation of Labor, 2014). It has also been found that babies born early-term are more susceptible to mortality and morbidity compared to their 39 to 40 week counterparts (Nonmedically Indicated Early-Term Deliveries, 2013). Through research, it has come to the conclusion that early inductions be reserved solely for those with medical indications, not convenience. …show more content…
Population of Interest The specific populations of interest for this clinical problem are pregnant women with full term pregnancies.