Analysis Of Dorian Solot's Five Non-Religious Arguments For Marriage

931 Words 4 Pages
Marriage, what everyone used to assume is the the turning point of one’s life, has now become the not so common fantasies girls have. People’s perspectives on marriage and traditional family value have changed a lot. Dorian Solot, the author of “On Not Saying ‘I Do’”, explains her concerns and thoughts on the concept of not getting married for her whole life in her article. She argues that marriage is just what the society uses to judge a person’s status, not what this word used to stand for, love, for instance. Conversely, the author of “Five Non-religious Arguments for Marriage”, Dennis Prager contradicts Solot’s idea by providing five different reasons and benefits of getting married. Prager is a life believer of the deep …show more content…
In Solot’s essay, she writes that “little gils dreamed played bridal dress-up, drew pictures of brides, gazed in magazines the latest tidal fashions, and eagerly anticipating their Prince Charming popping the question” (Solot 402). This sentence perfectly illustrates the popularity of the ides of a perfect wedding and a perfect marriage. People value marriage a lot in their lives and people have been valuing this concept for many years throughout the history. Marriage to most individuals, unlike what Solot categorize herself as unwilling to say yes to marriage, still hold the fantasies as well as expectation for a good marriage. Similarly, Prager points out the fact that “no matter what you think when living together, your relationship with your significant other changes when you marry” (Prager 410). Prager uses this sentence to stress the vitality of getting married to a couple. People get married not only for simply living together. It is about starting a new family together and that is what people truly value and look for in a marriage. The process of how two individuals who led to strangers now choose to spend the rest of life with one another and commits to each other is the vital part of a marriage. The two authors hold different perspectives of marriage and their different theories …show more content…
As Prager explains, “being legally bound to and responsible for another person matters” (Prager 410). The word “legally” and “responsible” indicates that people get married for far more critical reasons. Marriage is not just a piece of paper. It represents how two individuals choose each other and take social responsibilities for each other as well. Prager explains his thoughts in the article in his five reasons clearly. He values how marriage brings people more roles in the society and how that could alter and improve an individual. Just like what Solot says in her article, “the issues is the confusing tangle of meanings in the word ‘marriage’, and how they do and do not correspond to real-life relationships and real people’s lives” (Solot 403). The common sense is that people associate marriage with shared social status and beliefs for a couple. Once people get married, their appearance on the society alters completely and it could be a little bit messy especially for those who choose not to get married, such as Solot. However, others’ skepticism, questions and perceptions should not have much of an influence on how an individual is supposed to act. Disliking the thoughts of others should not be the dominant reason of one’s freedom and choice regarding marriage because in the end, the marriage is about you and your significant partner. Compared to what Prager said,

Related Documents