I would consider the article “ Donald Trump for President” as the more effective because it uses examples to support its argument why the author is voting for Donald Trump. The author mentions that Clinton will follow the same path of president Obama, and will increase the U.S’s debt. However, Trump will bring corporations, create new jobs, and advocate for lower taxes, and will lead to the prosperity of the county. Also, this article mentions the first and second amendment that could appeal to people who have a strong believe in those amendments, as the author mentions, “ The individual right to bear arms would be a likely casualty of a Clinton presidency.” People will believe that the amendments should not be change. On the other hand,
…show more content…
For example the author says, “ … Americans express frustration and disillusionment today with the political institutions that govern the nation.” this phrase expresses how people concern about the government. In contrast, Michael Brown did not use concrete language, for example: “[Trump] help me feel more confident” I wonder confident about what? If Trump is provoking a racial division that in the end would increase the social problems and discrimination. Also, he mentions, “...God will uses [Trump] for good, not for evil.” so, if Trump become president, is God responsible for Trump’s actions?
Furthermore, the article “ Donald Trump for President” did not use narrative to explain the author’s decision. While Brown uses narrative to explain why he is voting for Trump, his article is very personal every time he mentions himself, “ I have the opportunity to vote, I feel that I should vote for Trump.” This is a narrative article, seems like Brown is telling me why he chooses …show more content…
The author seems to be knowledgeable about the national elections, by giving examples, statistics, and for having year of experiences in news since 1909. In addition, the author is fair and reasonable by acknowledged the opposition through the article. Also, the author builds a bridge with the audience by supporting his argument with reason and examples. The author demonstrates professionalism by editing, proofreading, and using appropriate
For example the author says, “ … Americans express frustration and disillusionment today with the political institutions that govern the nation.” this phrase expresses how people concern about the government. In contrast, Michael Brown did not use concrete language, for example: “[Trump] help me feel more confident” I wonder confident about what? If Trump is provoking a racial division that in the end would increase the social problems and discrimination. Also, he mentions, “...God will uses [Trump] for good, not for evil.” so, if Trump become president, is God responsible for Trump’s actions?
Furthermore, the article “ Donald Trump for President” did not use narrative to explain the author’s decision. While Brown uses narrative to explain why he is voting for Trump, his article is very personal every time he mentions himself, “ I have the opportunity to vote, I feel that I should vote for Trump.” This is a narrative article, seems like Brown is telling me why he chooses …show more content…
The author seems to be knowledgeable about the national elections, by giving examples, statistics, and for having year of experiences in news since 1909. In addition, the author is fair and reasonable by acknowledged the opposition through the article. Also, the author builds a bridge with the audience by supporting his argument with reason and examples. The author demonstrates professionalism by editing, proofreading, and using appropriate