Analysis Of Descartes Dream Argument

Improved Essays
Register to read the introduction… Many different interpretations of Descartes’ dream argument could derive from his theory. In lecture we interpreted Descartes’ Dream Argument as follows: 1. If I am dreaming, most of my beliefs about the things around me are false. 2. Therefore, if I’m dreaming, I lack knowledge of my surroundings 3. There are never any reliable signs to distinguish dreaming from being …show more content…
This means that his premises make the conclusion more likely, but does not guarantee that the conclusion will be true. We interpreted Descartes’ conclusion as: if we never know if we are awake or dreaming, than we cannot be aware of our surroundings, ever. By coming to this conclusion from his premises, the conclusion is still not guaranteed; therefore making it an inductive argument. I don’t believe that it is a fair statement to say that every single person is never aware of their surroundings. This is a form of an enumerative induction. Enumerative Induction is the process of deriving a generalization about an entire group of things based on observing some of the members of that group. Similar to a stereotype; it is never right to assume the same thing for a group of …show more content…
An argument that has a conclusion that is directly based off of the premises is valid. In Descartes’ dream argument, he comes to the conclusion that he lacks knowledge of his surroundings because he doesn’t know when he is or is not dreaming. Since he is not sure about being in a dream state, than he really cannot reach a conclusion from that premise. His premises do not support a concrete conclusion. Therefore, the argument is invalid. However, Descartes argument could be seen as sound. I think that if a person were to read his argument for the first time, they might believe it without questioning his premises. His argument is not completely illogical and off base, but if it is examined more closely, I think people would question its soundness. For the most part, it seems like a logical and sound point,

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    These arguments by Descartes were intended to proof God’s existence; nonetheless, the two arguments had weaknesses. An example, in the first argument a person can deny having a perfect idea that is caused by God and therefore not acknowledge the existence of God. With this line of argumentative points, Descartes arguments do not hold meaning and as a consequence the conclusion cannot follow. Second argument is also weak in the sense that Descartes believes that God is perfect and is not a deceiver. How is it then that the imperfect is a deceiver?…

    • 1137 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He instead uses these points to show a bigger truth that nothing can be proven with our senses. How can one prove that anything around them is real? Without senses and the knowledge people have been taught over time, there is no way to prove the life around them is real. Descartes argues that nothing is certain without knowledge to back it up. At a time when most philosophers used God to back their…

    • 1509 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes explores the nature of human perception through the mind as separated from the body. His meditations on the subject outline a number of principles regarding truth and understanding, but the Dream Argument for Skepticism is derived from a single principle. More specifically, Descartes explains that: "Accordingly, seeing that our senses sometimes deceive us, I was willing to suppose that there existed nothing really such as they presented to us; and because some men err in reasoning, and fall into paralogisms, even on the simplest matters of Geometry, I, convinced that I was as open to error as any other, rejected as false all the reasonings I had hitherto taken for demonstrations; and finally, when I considered that the very same…

    • 1051 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It can be possible that our dream, could be just our imagination and Descartes tried to solve this problem (Malcolm, 2010). Descartes created a core for knowledge, “the cogito”, which means “I think, therefore I am” which was partly the solution in providing knowledge for ourselves (Malcolm, 2010). However, Descartes claims that beyond our own thoughts is a reality of senses, but those senses could deceive us (Samuels,…

    • 1761 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Philosopher Rene Descartes wrote an influential piece named the “Meditations on First Philosophy.” In this work, his “First Meditation” mainly deals with doubt of existence and how doubt is made possible because of sensory deception. He creates the dream argument that argues about how it is possible to be uncertain about whether or not a person is in a real world or dream world. In philosopher G.E. Moore’s “Certainty” he attempts to debunk Descartes’ argument through showing the inconsistencies in his dream argument. Since Descartes’ argument is built on inconsistency, Moore’s replies are satisfactory.…

    • 1346 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, Barry Stroud and Elizabeth Wolgast provide different approaches to answer and understanding of the paradigm established in the argument. The context of the argument from ignorance that Descartes proposes is problematic when attempting to answer it . In Wolgast’s perspective, the argument from ignorance claims that the knowledge that one is not dreaming is a necessary condition to determine the existence of the external world. Under such circumstances, Wolgast claims that by considering ‘know’ as a necessary condition, then it becomes more difficult to provide evidence that will suffice the skeptic—…

    • 934 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this paper, I will explain Rene Descartes’ response from his Sixth Meditation to his dreaming argument from the First Meditation. Descartes’ Meditations are the processes of thinking that he attempted to create a stronger basis for our ways of thinking by doubting on various beliefs that are skeptical. In his Sixth Meditation, Descartes found an answer to his doubt and used that to refute his first premise of the dreaming argument. He knew that he could actually tell the different whether he was dreaming or not by matching the information he perceived and tracing it back to his memory. I will first introduce Descartes’ dreaming argument and then explain why the premises in his dreaming arguments are valid.…

    • 1139 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Main Idea: Paragraph, 2 People have always been interested in dreams. : Dreaming has a practial Function :Dreaming can activate our imagination Paragraph, 8 Main Idea: Studies suggest the importance of dreams : Dreams help us with learing : Dreams help us with meaning Paragraph, 9 Main idea: Dreams allow us to explore diffirent areas of life and practic new behavior. : We can practice with new conditions : We can find new solution.…

    • 230 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For Descartes, things are sure paying little mind to sense experience and it appears to be rationally unthinkably to think about them as false. Given this, Descartes builds up his reasoning for the existence of God as an all-perfect being. He does this by starting with a thought that is viewed as sure and ascribing what makes us feel as though something is sure. For this situation he considers something sure as something so plainly and strikingly saw that it can't be untrue. Here he infers then that for something to be true, I simply need to have an unmistakable and distinctive thought of it and that alone is sufficient precursor for its truth-esteem.…

    • 851 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    René Descartes’ dream argument supports his overarching argument for hyperbolic doubt, described in his Meditations on First Philosophy. The dream argument questions one’s perceptions, conscious and unconscious, and how one determines what is true and what is false. He does this by comparing experiences while awake or dreaming. Descartes continues on that since one also cannot tell the difference between what is a dream and what is real life, our perceptions could overall be false, and “assumes dreams are deceptive, first, because they are conscious experiences that are subjectively indistinguishable from standard waking experiences and second, because they involve false beliefs” (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy). Though the perceptions…

    • 1316 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Stroud believes that there is an argument in which no one can ever really know anything about the external world. Stroud examines how Descartes upon reflecting on his senses, was unable to rule out the possibility of dreaming which leads him to conclude that he has no knowledge of the world around him. Stroud then argues how Descartes couldn’t distinguish reality from the concept of dreaming, and since he believed one couldn’t know things on account of their dreams, then in simpler words he wouldn’t know anything. He basically states how he knows about the external world only if he knows that he is not dreaming, but he cannot know that he is dreaming at the moment, therefore he cannot know anything about the external world. So in order to know anything about the world around us we must then know for a fact that we are not…

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sheyla Vera Phil 106 Fall 2015 Descartes vs Hume Even though all philosophers claim to have different set of ideas and theories they all basically begin questioning the same thing. From one’s existence, gods existence, and the existence of the soul apart from the body. They all, in some way or another, have argued whether or not another philosopher’s theories are valid or not. When this happens we, as the readers, see the flaws that the previous theory had and then the possible flaws another philosopher might make when argue on the validity of a theory. Hume and Descartes are two philosophers who have argued on how we have come to know what we claim is truth in reference to knowledge, amongst other ideas pertaining to the mind.…

    • 1195 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Freud believed that nothing you do occurs by chance; every action and thought is motivated by your unconscious mind at some level. a. In order to live in a civilized society, you have a tendency to hold back your urges and hide your impulses. b. Because they can’t be expressed in a social setting, our urges and impulses are expressed in our unconscious mind, through our dreams. 2. For this reason, Freuds theory about dreams focused primarily on sexual desires and symbolism.…

    • 1734 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Matrix: Final There is an assurance that at one point in life, the end will come for each individual and everybody will perish at one point. For now, as humans and living things, we are all doing what we do best, exist. However, imagine if the life one believes to be a part of was not actual and in fact, it was all just a virtual concept in the mind. Having had watched the film, The Matrix, this paper analyzes comparisons between appearance and reality to the writings of Bertrand Russell’s, Problems of Philosophy. Thenceforward, René Descartes’, Meditations on First Philosophy are examined and the Method of Doubt is conveyed, carefully analyzing each of its stages.…

    • 1372 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In contrast, inductive reasoning makes broad generalizations from specific observations. From many observations, a pattern is discerned, a generalization is made, and an explanation or theory is inferred. It is often a prediction from the past about the future. From many observations, a person is able to interpret facts to support his or her theories. If a person uses experience or reason, they can justify their beliefs to get to…

    • 1512 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays

Related Topics