Dawkins Arguments About God's Existence

Improved Essays
Dawkins: Writing
In recent discussion of Dawkins’ “Arguments about God’s existence”, a controversial issue has been whether he offers a strong and valid argument about religion. Some argue that his paper is filled with false assertions about religion and the existence of God. From this perspective, Dawkins is proving that God doesn’t exist on false claims such as heredity and Agnostic beliefs. On the other hand, however, others argue that his arguments stem from logic and reason. That one needs evidence to prove that something exists and a lack of evidence against God not existing doesn’t prove that God does exist. According to this view God doesn’t exist and Dawkins proves it with logic. In sum then, the issue is whether his argument is valid or not valid.
My own view is that Dawkins’ arguments that God doesn’t exist are strong, they have direct premises that back up his conclusion. Although some might object that God does exist based on their own beliefs through religion, I would reply that Dawkins provides a strong argument against God existence through his examples. This issue is important because it brings attention to how we should
…show more content…
Dawkins claims, “they appeal to faith” and “faith is belief in spite of, even perhaps because the lack of evidence” (e). Dawkins is explaining the phenomenon that we call faith. He describes that people back-up religion with faith even though faith shows a lack of evidence. We must therefore question whether faith is good enough to be evidence of Gods existence. My own view on faith is that it is not a strong enough argument for proof of Gods existence. I agree with Dawkins that to believe something to be true there must be some kind of real evidence. I believe that most people would agree that evidence should be required to prove God exists but many people would argue there is no evidence against God’s

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In this paper I will explain and evaluate two popular arguments regarding the existence of God, A Scientific Argument for the Existence of God by Robin Collins and The Inductive Argument from Evil Against the Existence of God by William Rowe; then I will discuss how the conclusions are not compatible with one another due to the conflicting structure of the conclusions as well as how one cannot accept both conclusions without compromising one of the arguments. First I will explain the basis of Collins’ argument, which is one of the most frequently used arguments in favor of theism. In A Scientific Argument for the Existence of God, Collins centers around the observation of how finely tuned the physical constants of the universe are to the ability for any form of life to exist, if any of them were to change even the smallest bit then no life would possibly be able to develop not to…

    • 1636 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 1968 a philosopher named H.J. McCloskey wrote an article titled “On Being an Atheist,” which attacked the main arguments held by theists. The main arguments that he refers to as “proofs” are the cosmological argument, the teleological argument, and the ontological argument. McCloskey’s article debunks these arguments as being false and without proof. He states that theists should dismiss the idea of God entirely. He claims in his opening statements that he will show reasons why theists should be miserable just because they are theists (1).…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    His argument relies too much on people believing in his definition of God, and it also discredits the ability of humans to formulate ideas of a higher power. Both of these points provide too much doubt to the premises that they critique and thus lead to the conclusion that the argument is unsound. Despite the argument containing its fair share of flaws, the argument is still important. It offers food for thought about the existence of God, and it provides so many opportunities for debate and discussion on the existence of a higher…

    • 1259 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dawkins Research Paper

    • 657 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Dawkins says that people should believe in the theory of evolution without any proof. Since there are an existence of fossils, there are a certified tested proof of evolution. Fossil evidence of whales and turtles are talked about in this chapter. Dawkins does discuss in small detail the questionable crocoduck. Evolution clearly does not only rely on fossils.…

    • 657 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Teleological Argument The existence of God can be supported by the design argument or teleological arguments that conclude: since nature looks like it was designed, then nature was or has a designer which we call God. Not only is nature designed but things humans have created are designed also. In order to have something in existence, it must have a creator which must have designed that something. A number of arguments utilize design arguments in favor of the existence of God.…

    • 1740 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Sometimes called the Teleological Argument (‘telos’ in Greek means ‘purpose’), the Design Argument is one of the oldest, most prevalent and most popular out of all the arguments for the existence of God that have been created throughout the years. Ever since it was first recorded in Greek philosophy by Xenophon in 390 BCE, various forms of the argument have been put forth by many different respected philosophers of their respective times from Thomas Aquinas in the Middle Ages to Richard Swinburne in the modern day. Comparatively, however, many notable philosophers have also put forth criticisms such as David Hume and Richard Dawkins. In this essay, I will be examining the different forms of the argument and discussing the criticisms against…

    • 2079 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the mid-20th century, a renowned philosopher H.J. McCloskey wrote an attention-grabbing article called “On being and Atheist”. In McCloskey article, he argues on how the existences of God fails to be proven or sustained. The author argues that there is insufficient arguments to prove a theist belief while accrediting an atheistic point of view. The following essay is a response to McCloskey article from a different angle.…

    • 1570 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In review of the three arguments related to the Proof for the Existence of a god, I found all three arguments to be very convincing, opinionating and interesting. These arguments appeared to be based on personal opinions, while convincing the reader to their beliefs from either a religious view, logical view or natural purpose view. The concept they all appeared to have in common was that they all believed god did exist, which I found to be very enlightening. My impression of each argument would be in the following comments.…

    • 435 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He presents this assumption by simple “proofs” concluding that neither of them, exclusively, should create enough solace or security to have confidence in God. Nonetheless, in the event that we adopt the cumulative case strategy in clarifying the presence of God, what we have is progressions of truthsthat, separately, can't realize distinct evidence, be that as it may, together, make simultaneousness” He makes this argument against the cosmological argument maintaining the existence of the cosmos , the creation itself,implies the existence of a creator . Central to this argument is the following preposition of cosmological argument and intelligent design from Evans and Manis : “If anything now exists, something must be eternal.”…

    • 1317 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    2.2.8 Norman Malcolm Malcolm expanded on Anselm’s second argument, where most saw the second argument as a rephrasing of the first, Malcolm saw it as an entirely different argument. He believes that Anselm’s second argument is actually an argument that it is greater to exist necessarily rather than contingently, so it becomes a part of the concept that the greatest conceivable being would exist necessarily rather than contingently. This would free the argument from one of Kant’s critiques; the critique that existence isn’t a valid predicate, using this new argument, existence actually adds something to our concept of what God is rather than just being a statement on whether he exists. The crux of the argument is whether or not there exists a unique being that must exist necessarily rather than contingently, everything we know is contingent on something else, for example, you are contingent on your parents.…

    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Design Argument is used as argument for God’s existence. It states that the universe as we know it, is comprised of complexity, and complex things do not solely come in to being, but must have been intelligently designed. If the universe and its components are complex, there must be someone that intelligently designed them, therefore, there must be a designer and that must be God. The design argument can be understood as being an argument for the existence of God and it achieves this by being an inductive argument from analogy. We make an analogy between how things exist with intricate details in nature and that complex composition along with intelligent design are required for the Design Argument for God.…

    • 1191 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The cosmological argument, in it’s simplest terms, can be broken up into a few understood points that make it what some to believe the answer to God’s existence. The same form of argument that the cosmological argument possesses can actually be applied to discrediting the existence of God. The origin of time and the relationship between an infinite set of causes and effects and if it has a creator both work together in forming good points against the credibility of the cosmological argument made for the existence of God. There are two main assertions made by the argument in favor of God’s existence. The first, when laid out in simpler terms, is as follows; everything that exists must have a first cause so that means that if the universe began to exist, it must have a first cause.…

    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    God: The Existence Of God

    • 1002 Words
    • 4 Pages

    His argument looks at the broad sense of what God is and disregards your individual opinion on what God is if you have one. Someone can argue with the argument by saying something not completely relevant to the argument such as saying we have not actually proved the existence of God because we still do not know if he is the creator of the universe is. However, that has nothing to do with our argument. We have proved the definition and therefore existence of God; not whether or not he is the creator. Through the use of deductive argument, the strong premises have persuaded me that God does in fact…

    • 1002 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The subject of whether or not God exists has elicited numerous philosophical debates over the years. Many philosophers have questioned whether God exists, with some arguing that he does exist while others refute this claim. The debates on the existence of God is based on the teleological and cosmological arguments. In his article, McCloskey refutes the claims made by these two arguments and holds that they are false. The author states that humans should dismiss the idea of God since there is evil in the world.…

    • 1393 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For one, Dawkins doesn’t rely on blind faith but rather what has been proven. He expressed how there was no God driving the evolution of all living things as proven by Darwin. Dawkins brought forward a form of comparison where he compared Evolution to a swerving driver. He said that if a car was werving you would think that an agent was controlling the car and in that case Lennox would be…

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics