Dawkins Arguments About God's Existence

Improved Essays
Dawkins: Writing
In recent discussion of Dawkins’ “Arguments about God’s existence”, a controversial issue has been whether he offers a strong and valid argument about religion. Some argue that his paper is filled with false assertions about religion and the existence of God. From this perspective, Dawkins is proving that God doesn’t exist on false claims such as heredity and Agnostic beliefs. On the other hand, however, others argue that his arguments stem from logic and reason. That one needs evidence to prove that something exists and a lack of evidence against God not existing doesn’t prove that God does exist. According to this view God doesn’t exist and Dawkins proves it with logic. In sum then, the issue is whether his argument is valid or not valid.
My own view is that Dawkins’ arguments that God doesn’t exist are strong, they have direct premises that back up his conclusion. Although some might object that God does exist based on their own beliefs through religion, I would reply that Dawkins provides a strong argument against God existence through his examples. This issue is important because it brings attention to how we should
…show more content…
Dawkins claims, “they appeal to faith” and “faith is belief in spite of, even perhaps because the lack of evidence” (e). Dawkins is explaining the phenomenon that we call faith. He describes that people back-up religion with faith even though faith shows a lack of evidence. We must therefore question whether faith is good enough to be evidence of Gods existence. My own view on faith is that it is not a strong enough argument for proof of Gods existence. I agree with Dawkins that to believe something to be true there must be some kind of real evidence. I believe that most people would agree that evidence should be required to prove God exists but many people would argue there is no evidence against God’s

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    To reexamine the argument in favor, I would say that it is a valid argument, because if the premises are true then the conclusion would also logically be true. However, premise one is not completely true, due to the fact that there are people who do not believe in God. Agnostics and atheists would not hold true that acts are morally right if God commands them. The objection to the existence of God is a major reason why the Divine Command Theory is not able to fully support the argument. If God is not real, then He could not have created or interpreted morals.…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Atheism Vs Religion

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages

    This further opposes the inclusivity that should encompass the worship of a god as presented by religion. This ideology in a way strengthens the argument of the atheists against religion. The existence of god is seen as a subjective experience where different people have experienced god through different ways for instance through dreams, visions while some have only seen him through the angels (Honderich, 1995). This further negates the assumptions of religion. Questions have also arisen concerning the origin of god where people have found it hard to believe that god might have arisen from nothing.…

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Morality And Religion

    • 1201 Words
    • 5 Pages

    There are so many religions, and therefore possible sources of knowledge. Identifying one source of knowledge becomes problematic. Finally, morality cannot depend on the commandments of God. If morality depended on the commandments of God, either morality is arbitrary or God’s command is irrelevant. After careful examination of the arguments supporting the view that religion is essential for morality, it is clear that morality can exist independently from…

    • 1201 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    This problem proves that there is a separate standard of right and wrong that has nothing to do with God or His commands. Most believers want to acknowledge an idea that right and wrong was created by their religion and God because they think they are not religious if they don’t associate right and wrong with God. Since this theory fails to connect morality with God, then believers of Him would dismiss it. This dismissal of the theory should not alter their faith in God, though. Many scholars and believers, like St. Thomas Aquinas, refused the Divine Command Theory for this reason but still believe in God and His instructions.…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Self-evident propositions are propositions in which the evidence of its truth lies in the proposition itself. Aquinas says “God exists” is a self-evident proposition in itself. Which is true, but just stating “God exists”, does not permit for those who do not believe God exists, to understand how the proposition will prove any existence. In order for a proposition to be self-evident to us, there must be an understanding in addition to the proposition being self-evident within itself. An atheist may argue that solely saying “God exists” does not imply he actually exists, there has to be further analysis in order to make an atheist question whether or not God exists.…

    • 1008 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I completely disagree with this argument because it is completely based off of the fact that faith has to be true. I am okay with other people believing in faith because it is a huge part of many people’s lives. However, I am not a person that is going to believe this. I think that if someone believes that faith is the same thing as natural knowledge, they are going to obviously have strong religious beliefs. However, natural knowledge is not the same thing as faith; they are completely different.…

    • 1472 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    It is possible to prove that truth exists but belief is almost impossible. A belief can be explained in many different ways like the different religions do in explaining the existence of God, but truth can only be explained in only one way, what the proponents of this theory expect. The concept of God’s existence is a belief proposal and not a truth. A belief proposal is not a knowledge whereas a truth is based on the knowledge. When the proponents of the theory of conflicting truths argue against the existence of God, they seem to interpret it as a knowledge and not a belief proposal, and when they fail to find the knowledge to support the existence of God, then they discredit the same existence.…

    • 1726 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There is indication that belief does not have to be verifiable. There are some ideas that religion may not be accurate, however that is how someone applies their faith into practice. It is believed that belief depends on the specific individual. For example, belief can be applied through personal experience of how God has been faithful in their life or others’ life. In the article, “The Lost Legacy of Anselm's Argument: Re-Thinking the Purpose of Proofs for the Existence of God” explains about how many philosophers of religion, have confirm the existence of God and also have not confirmed the existence of God.…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Rationalism In Religion

    • 2796 Words
    • 12 Pages

    This does not seem like it would work, however they take from the “strong rationalists” the idea that there should be some evidence to help support what it is they believe, but that this does not go so far as to be 100 percent proof in their belief system. The “critical rationalist” take the opposite of “fideism” and say that it should be rational to argue and search religious beliefs. Is it rational to keep believing in a religious faith even when your peers are looking at the same evidence and finding a different answer? This can be rational when you are a “critical rationalist.” People around the world do not, or cannot have the time and or intelligence to fully understand and grapple…

    • 2796 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Of course, Humes only feel religious beliefs can be rational if they have concrete evidence to support. Humes doesn’t question whether God exists or not, but if we as people can come up with a conclusion on Gods nature and being. In respondence to what Aquinas states and his five reason, I believe Humes wouldn’t completely agree with Aquinas. I say this because Humes is all about being rational. If there isn’t enough evidence in the world, he believes that there may not be a way to find out if God a powerful, wise and perfect.…

    • 1606 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays

Related Topics