David Hume Skepticism

Improved Essays
The basis behind Hume and everything that he teaches is quite simple. Hume is telling people that they must acknowledge the fact that scientific knowledge or knowledge in general is not quite what people think it is. It is not secure. This idea is thought provoking and very scary. This is telling people that they must throw out much of what they believe to be true and begin to question it. Knowledge is not always what people believe it to be. Hume based his teachings on skepticism rather than rationalism. Rationalism was unacceptable to him.
Hume’s skepticism is pretty hard to wrap my mind around. He is teaching that our minds naturally associate the past with the present and future. He believes that as individuals we seek uniformity in life.
…show more content…
The natural association of the mind is mind bending. To think that one makes these associations out of comfort, or whatever reason their brain decides, makes me think a lot. My first thought went to young children and parents. As young children, we often listen to our parents and begin to mimic them or repeat phrases they say. We watch their actions and the words that go with them and suddenly begin to make those connections. When we are young we hear our parents curse and naturally repeat them like we do with all other words. This can become a problem because we have just associated these specific words with traumatic or negative experiences. These associations are not necessarily bad, but I began to question if we hadn’t made the assumption of those words to be negative or hurtful, would we consider them “bad” still? It is natural and acceptable in society to believe negative words to be unacceptable. This shows that our knowledge now is really based off of what we are taught. We go with the flow and avoid questioning these ideas. Hume questioned so much and changed the way people …show more content…
Two people could be playing the same sport such as football and one person could be enjoying the sort while the other person isn’t. Hume taught to question knowledge and its universality. With this is situation one of the players is going to believe that football is the best sport. The other person is going to fail to see the joy and goodness that the first player has gotten out of football. One of the players may find connections and uniformity out of football, while the other makes no sense of it. This is good because this is breaking the connections and adding difference in

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    He argues that the analogy between the universe and human creations, such as machines is weak, since the universe is not really as obviously similar to a machine as the argument claims. The arrangement, composition, and workings of the universe are extremely different from a man-made machine. He explains that even a single and small difference between the effects of two things can reveal great differences between the causes. This refutation of the argument is plausible, since it shows that an argument from analogy only works effectively when the things we're comparing are extremely similar, but the universe is totally different from a machine or watch. Also, Hume argues that we have only limited exposure to a part of the universe, yet we're taking attributes based on imperfect observations of that small part, such as order, design, and intelligence and using them to make a claim about the whole universe.…

    • 1287 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Most individuals generally like to think of themselves as moral human beings. They often directly link their moral judgments to reason alone. However, in the 18th century, Hume made the suggestion that moral judgments could be based on emotions rather than unadulterated reason. In his Moral Philosophy, Hume argues that moral distinctions are not derived from reason, but rather determined by moral emotions: feelings of approval, or disgust felt by spectators who contemplate a moral trait or action (Owen, 1992). Moral judgments find their foundation in an assessment of actions of people with respect to the set of merits ingrained in their society (Haidt, 2001).…

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The first objection is that we have no information of earth’s creation. Hume states the fact that everything we claim to know have originated from previous experiences of similar objects being created. For instance, with a watch we know it has to be created by a watchmaker because we can witness it being made and compare it to other similar watches in their design. However, he argues that we have no experience of the earth's creation, or any other universe's creations to associate our own universe to, and will never so it would be invalid to assume that an intelligent designer has created our universe in the same way in which a watch…

    • 547 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He also claims that every detail of intelligence that we have an understanding of is within animals, then proceeds to argue that it is more logical to view intelligence not as the originating cause of conflict order, but as a resulted cause. Hume believes that intelligence is not the beginning cause, but it is the blind, uncaring forces of nature that contributes to cause. A law implies a law creator, without a law creator, the law is meaningless and cannot accomplish anything to where Hume…

    • 848 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Hume is a philosopher who is skeptical of miracles in any form. The first argument behind Hume’s skepticism is surrounded by the idea of a priori. A priori is having knowledge or a belief based on one’s thought alone, independent from experience. This is simply believing what you have heard from a separate source, or one’s own hypothesis, without proof.…

    • 1950 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Copy Principle: Prompt One David Hume, in the book, “An Enquiry of Human Understanding,” denies the thought that ideas are innate or come from within us. Instead, he claims that all ideas, when they are first experienced are derived or duplicated from simple impressions or world experiences. This is known as Hume’s Copy Principle. To prove his hypothesis, Hume divides his argument into two sections.…

    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Christopher Kettyle Professor Kaspar Philosophy 3000 24 October 2016 Chisholm v Locke Identity Roderick Chisholm's theory and John Locke's theory on identity consists on what their fundamental belief is about identity, while giving examples supporting this idea. Multiple philosophers have explanations about identity but by comparing Chisholm's and Locke's theory you will get a better idea about this metaphysical problem. By doing a comparison this will show you the ideas of these philosophers.…

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hume’s Argument for the Belief in Uniformity of Nature Hume begins section seven of An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding by expanding on his definitions he introduced in previous sections. In this section, on the idea of necessary connection,…

    • 403 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Throughout the course of the mid-late 1800’s, cases of both gynocentrism and androcentrism were evident within commonly accepted scientific “fact”. In his analytical paper Women’s Brains, Stephen J. Gould notes the particular biases among multiple leading scientists of the time in relation to the misconceptions about female intelligence. “In the most intelligent races, as among the Parisians, there are a large number of women whose brains are closer in size to those of gorillas than to the most developed male brains” (Women’s Brains. Gould). Such were the ideas at the time of noted craniometrists, specifically Paul Broca and his disciples.…

    • 1851 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of the main concepts that Hume is known for is his idea of causality and the problem of induction. Hume believed that we can cannot prove…

    • 1421 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In The Humanistic Tradition the author, Gloria Fiero presents Martin Luther as the voice of the religious reform movement against the abuses of the Church of Rome. Martin Luther's revolt against the church was an attempt to put an end to “the misery and wretchedness of Christendom” (Friero, Pg. 475). Hence he insisted that the way to find peace with God was through having heartful faith in God. Thus this idea contradicted some of the corrupt behaviors that the church was practicing such as indulgences. Consequently, Martin Luther’s attempt to reform Catholicism through his work…

    • 1310 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Because human rely so much on cause and effect Hume was interested in seeing if cause and effect could be counted as true knowledge. However, a lot of times we use…

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Hume believed that justice promoted human happiness. Hume was a moral sentimentalist so he believed morality was grounded in something other than reason. He was similar to Hutcheson in this aspect but he also believed individual justice can sometime conflict with what benevolence would motivate us to do. A sentimentalist believes that judgments about what is right depends on our passions rather than reason or a moral sense but, he also thinks the sentimentalist owes us an account of how a sense of justice that is opposed to sympathy or self-interest that can also develop out of such motives. The virtue of justice in not natural and is actually artificial according to Hume.…

    • 1117 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, neither has been found truer than the other. Essentially, there is no right or wrong answer. Based on modern scientific views, some may believe that Hume’s ideas have the edge over Descartes. However it does seem ironic considering that Descartes believed that knowledge was only gained through logic and scientific method. His very methods were in turn used against him to prove that his ideas on human understanding have been used to debunk his ideas about…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    David Hume was a Scottish philosopher famous for his radical empiricism and skepticism.…

    • 1303 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays

Related Topics