• Home Page
  • Analysis Of Critique On The Gotha Programme By Karl Marx

Analysis Of Critique On The Gotha Programme By Karl Marx

Improved Essays
Show More
The systematic exploitation of workers is something that should never be justified, and that needs to be addressed in some manner. In texts dealing with the exploitation, there is often a call for revolution. Though over the course of history, there has been a great number of revolutions or uprising that have occurred. Nowhere in the world is immune to experiencing them, nowhere in the world has there never been a need. Unfortunately though, looking through a historical lens, those revolutions do not seem to fix the issues at hand, but instead only reset the system with a new group of oppressors at the top. What does that truly change? The class that is in power merely receives a change of clothes and a new name. My theory is that the correct …show more content…
Early in the document Marx goes in depth about using workers as a means to an end, explaining the value of labor, the source of all wealth, and the relationship of labor and society. “the man who possesses no other property than his labor power must, in all conditions of society and culture, be the slave of other men who have made themselves the owners of the material conditions of labor. He can only work with their permission, hence live only with their permission.” Essentially, Marx is saying that the control over the workers’s lives do not belong to them at all. In fact, the bourgeoisie say when you live and when you cannot live through wages, in the sense that if you want to do anything, feed your family, travel, have a home, you need to have money, which is given to you by the owners of labor. If they say you cannot get that wage, you are basically not allowed to live or be able to provide for yourself. Transitioning form capitalism to communism was what Marx’s key philosophy was and in order to make that mover their needs to be some form of revolution. “Between capitalist and communist society there lies the period of the revolutionary transformation of the one into the other. Corresponding to this is also a political transition period in which the state can be nothing but the revolutionary dictatorship of the …show more content…
“We know that the present State is not “society” representing the “rising working class.” It is itself the representative of capitalist society. It is a class state.” Those words ring very true, especially in America. The Government in The United States can be clearly seen being in favor of those who have the money, and that is because those people are the ones who give them the funding to get elected. By rigging the system, which should be by the people, for the people, to be in favor of those already in power they take the power away from the working class people. Luxemberg believes in the ability to make gradual social reforms is the way to work towards socialism is a viable and legitimate alternative to revolution if it is done correctly. “The trade union struggle for hours and wages and the political struggle for reforms will lead to a progressively more extensive control over the conditions of production,” and “as the rights of the capitalist proprietor will be diminished through legislation, he will be reduced in time to the role of a simple administrator.” “The capitalist will see his property lose more and more value to himself” till finally “the direction and administration of exploitation will be taken from him entirely” and “collective exploitation” instituted.” Those who control the labor should not be the only

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    John Locke's Views Of The Society Of Utopia A Perfect Society
    • 1694 Words
    • 7 Pages

    John Locke's Views Of The Society Of Utopia A Perfect Society

    Marx believed that the process of production and the distribution of the means of life is necessary to be examined to analyze a society and its problems. Marx further related these means of production to class struggle and labor power. Furthermore, Marx believes that the Bourgeoisie class possesses all the means of production and exploits the Proletariat class by making use of the working class labor for their own profits and thus, make their private property. Therefore, Marx proposed the idea of “Communism” under which he depicts this class struggle within the society and promotes the idea of no private property, meaning where all the property is publically owned and everyone works and gets what they deserve on the basis of their ability and needs rather than acquiring it inherently. Furthermore, he was strictly against capitalism and believes it to be inherently unstable. This idea of Marx is based on the fact that the bourgeoisie has transformed various professions such as “the physician, the lawyer, the priest, the poet, the man of science, into its paid wage labourers” (Communist Manifesto 16). Furthermore, according to Marx, with the free market the bourgeoisie class takes all the profits of the capital and pay these laborers with the minimum wages which cease them from further increasing their conditions and thus, their labor is not serving them…

    • 1694 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Karl Marx's Theories Of Alienation
    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Karl Marx's Theories Of Alienation

    In the context of the industrial revolution, the wages of the workers were very small and their privileges were the least of their employer’s concerns. This idea of oppressive labour is important but society is very different now than it was in Marx’s. Workers have rights, are paid better and work in better conditions. This does not at all distract from the fact that there are businesses around world that abuse and mistreat their workers like in China but we cannot deny that conditions of work are better now. In the past, workers were considered just to be objects with a certain usefulness that produced products and profits. Talking more about China, although the workers are paid poorly they are not attached to the products they make which is what Marx thinks. Leslie Chang says that they do not care who buys the products they make. She feels that it is what the workers spend the money on and what emotions they feel is what matter, not what products they…

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    What, According To Marx In The Communist Manifesto
    • 1536 Words
    • 7 Pages

    What, According To Marx In The Communist Manifesto

    The new dominance of the bourgeoisie created a social class within the bourgeoisie, and thus the proletariat emerged (4-5). These “wage-laborers who, having no means of production of their own, are reduced to selling their labor power in order to live” (1). The creation of the proletariat was a necessary affect to bourgeoisie’s approaches of production- a superiority complex and divide for struggle naturally came about between the owners of the production and the working force (6). The bourgeois industries expanded and increased their own capital, leaving the lower class unable to compete; Now and then the workers are victorious, but only for a time” (6). This dissonance eventually caused corrosion within the structure of the proletariat, and this struggle created the revolutionary element which eventually destroyed the bourgeois oppressors: “What the bourgeoisie, therefore, produces, above all, is its own grave-diggers. Its fall and the victory of the proletariat are equally inevitable.”…

    • 1536 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Karl Marx And Samuel Smiles Analysis
    • 1171 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Karl Marx And Samuel Smiles Analysis

    This German philosopher was in the midst of many revolutions throughout his time. At one point, he was known as the spokesman of the ‘Communist Party’ in 1848, which signifies the kind of involvement he was intervened within at the time. Although Marx was a member of a wealthy family in which he utilized to acquire good education, he was a philosopher who critiqued capitalism. Marx attacks the bourgeoisie families and individuals who happened to be property owners or factory occupants, and critiqued these families and individuals because he believed as property owners; they would need to hire people in order to operate the property. His idea of discarding the middle class was revealed in the third idea of his book The Communist Manifesto. It states, “Abolish of all right of inheritance” (Marx and Engels 124). If this were to happen, those with inheritance to receive would not quietly sit by, as no one would voluntarily hand over his or her wealth. Marx assumed this would be a great strategy to bring a cessation of the existence of a middle class. When one class works for another, the more superior class happens to reap the benefits while the inferior ones are oppressed and this is the ideology/system Marx opposed. Marx believed a better system could emerge if the…

    • 1171 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Summary: Dissent From Capitalism
    • 1641 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Summary: Dissent From Capitalism

    “What does this accusation amount to? The history of all past society is the history of class antagonisms, which took different forms in different epochs” (Blaisdell 140-141). Karl Marx made an accusation that capitalism will eventually come to an end. The Horizontalist Movement in Argentina, Sabotage in the American Workplace, and the Occupy Movement in the United States can all prove Marx’s predictions to be authentic.…

    • 1641 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Nietzsche's 'On The Genealogy Of Morality'
    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Nietzsche's 'On The Genealogy Of Morality'

    For Marx, the bourgeoisie class controlled the manufacturing system and established “new conditions of oppression” to control the proletariat (Marx, 159-160). Therefore, a class struggle existed and it was worsening for the proletariat class as the bourgeoisie were “constantly revolutionizing the instruments of production, and thereby the relations of production, and with them the whole relations of society” (Marx, 161). However, for Marx, the exploitation of the proletariat for capital will not continue as the bourgeoisie are digging their own graves by continuing to oppress the working class (Marx, 169). Also, in contrast to Nietzsche who says that the slaves are weak and hopeless, Marx does not consider the proletariat as inherently weak. In fact, Marx is clear in stating that the “fall and the victory of the proletariat are equally inevitable” especially with the increase in the proletariat’s revolutionary consciousness (Marx, 169). Furthermore, to showcase that the proletarians are capable of responding to the bourgeoisie class through occasional revolts, Marx suggests that the proletarians “form combinations (trade unions)” and these will serve as “permanent associations” to riot against the bourgeoisie class (Marx, 166). Therefore, since proletarians are oppressed by the bourgeoisie, the bourgeoisie state, and are enslaved by the machines, Marx suggests a revolution that will physically re-constitute society or result “in the common ruin of the contending classes” (Marx, 159,…

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    How Has Karl Marx Changed America
    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages

    How Has Karl Marx Changed America

    “Like the classical economists, he focused on the dynamic evolution of capitalism as a system, and the turbulent relationships between different classes.”(Stanford p.54) During the Mid-nineteenth century, Marx opposed capitalism, believing “payment of profit on private investments did not reflect any particular economic function” (Stanford p.54). Marx is saying that the workers aren’t getting paid for the amount of work they put in. Capitalists were exploiting these workers and rather than sharing the wealth/profits, they were paying the workers a diminished amount (Labor Theory of Value). This is where Marx’s political beliefs ties into his economic beliefs. He criticized the exploitation of workers and described a socialist alternative to capitalism. (Stanford Table 4.1 chart.pg 60). Marx’s ideal solution is a socialist economy. Most Capitalist business owners are grossly overpaid in comparison to their workers who are actually doing the labor. Marx’s socialist plan is basically turning capitalism into communism. Instead of having a capitalistic society making wealthy people wealthier at the expense of hard working laborers, the socialist society will work towards making sure the poor gets paid equally with everyone else and to eliminate social classes. Karl Marx political and economic views…

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Karl Marx The Rights Of Man Analysis
    • 1744 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Karl Marx The Rights Of Man Analysis

    Karl Marx sought to abolish the belief system that preserved the uneven distribution of wealth and prolonged the suffering of the proletariat. As a result of the industrial revolution, the upper class exercised its power over the lower classes exclusively for the purpose of protecting self-interest. The labor of the lower classes not only supported their subsistence, but upheld the luxurious existence of the bourgeoisie as well. While the bourgeoisie retained control of the means of production, they entered an agreement with the proletariat to form “the rights of man,” which preserve the rights to life, liberty, and security with the limitation that one man’s rights should not undermine the rights of another. In his effort to outline the implications of “the rights of man,” Karl Marx presents a clear argument that the rights to life, liberty, and security ultimately preserve self-interest and detach man from civil society.…

    • 1744 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Why Do Illegal Immigrants Enter South America
    • 1996 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Why Do Illegal Immigrants Enter South America

    This document highlights the struggle between the capitalist and the working class. Marx believed that society is made up of two classes the bourgeoisie, those who own the means of production, and the proletariat, the mass of workers who do not own the means of production.…

    • 1996 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Bourgeois And Brooches In The Communist Manifesto By Karl Marx
    • 690 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Bourgeois And Brooches In The Communist Manifesto By Karl Marx

    Marx says, “oppressor and oppressed, stood in constant opposition to one another, carried on an uninterrupted, now hidden, now open fight, a fight that each time ended in a revolutionary reconstitution of society at large” (Marx, 657). Throughout history, there had been a succession of revolutions between the bourgeois and proletarians. Each revolution led to a node their revolution that will one day lead to a communist utopia. The actions of the bourgeois will incite new feelings of discontent in the lower classes that will allow history to repeat itself…

    • 690 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    The Flaws Of Capitalism In The Capital, By Karl Marx
    • 1087 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Flaws Of Capitalism In The Capital, By Karl Marx

    In the capitalist system, there are two social classes: the proletariat and the bourgeoisie. The proletariat is the largest social group comprised of poor working class individuals that sell labor in exchange for wages. The bourgeoisie in comparison is a small group made up of wealthy individuals who buy labor from the working class. This is the relationship that has been described previously between the capitalist and the worker. The point of contention amidst the two stems from the unequal distribution of power and…

    • 1087 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Bourgeoisie Research Paper
    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Bourgeoisie Research Paper

    Today, the bourgeoisie maintain their grasp on power because “in order for the bourgeoisie to continue to exist, they must continually revolutionize the instruments of production.” (Marx 476) Capitalism manages to thrive because the private owners have taken advantage over the proletarians via advancing technology. Capitalism also began to increase with the onset of the Industrial Revolution. Marx contended that the bourgeoise are still expanding in size and exploiting global markets in a never-ending cycle to stay one step ahead of the workers (Marx 476). Through mass communication and unionization, the gap between the classes is closing, while constant struggle by the bourgeoisie to stay ahead of the proletarians intensifies. Marx cited…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Marx Oppressor
    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Marx Oppressor

    Marx succinctly describes the history of society in terms of class struggle as “oppressor and oppressed. “Freeman and slave, patrician and plebeian, lord and serf, guild-master and journeyman” and now the bourgeoisie and the proletariat, all which stood in constant opposition. The bourgeoisie is the “oppressor” in this case, being the social class who own the means of production and are concerned with withholding capital and wealth to ensure their economic supremacy.…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Capitalism In Karl Marx's Communist Manifesto
    • 1125 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Capitalism In Karl Marx's Communist Manifesto

    A functioning society must have equality for all persons, as well as maintaining a productive economy. In Adam Smith’s Wealth of Nations, the worker is exploited constantly to increase revenue. Smith states “His(workers) wages are soon reduced to what is barely enough to enable him to bring up a family, or to continue the race of laborers.”. This negative view on workers and the role they play in society shows how unsustainable a capitalistic economy is. Another negative is the exploitation of workers, especially children. Capitalism does not give any protection to workers, and does not even condemn the beating of them. The workers are the driving force in the manufacturing business, and their oppression will eventually lead to downfall of the economy.…

    • 1125 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Marxism In Fight Club
    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Marxism In Fight Club

    Capitalism, according to Marx, is a mode of production based on private ownership of the means of production. It is a system of social relations in which labour-power is commodified and the driving force of society is the accumulation of capital. Marx theorized that economic systems result in two social classes, one of which holds the power and uses it to oppress the other. In capitalism, this is the bourgeoisie, the capitalists, who own the means of production, and the proletariat who’s labour allows the system to function and is the source of the bourgeoisie’s power. As such, the social relations of production are antagonistic. Given this power struggle class conflict is inherent. Marx’s critique of capitalism speculates that the proletariats…

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More

Related Topics

Ready To Get Started?
Discover
Company
Follow
©2023 Cram.com
Privacy Policy |  About Ads |  Site Map |  Advertise  | 
  • Cookie Settings