Donald Trump Crippled America Analysis

Better Essays
Crippled America, a book written by Donald J. Trump, is about his controversial views on current major issues. Donald Trump is a rich and well known businessman who is a leading Republican candidate for the 2016 presidential election. Donald Trump was born in 1946 in Queens, New York, the son of Frederick and Mary Trump. Donald was a troublemaker at a young age causing his parents sent him to New York Military Academy at the age of 13. The military academy transformed Donald into a disciplined and strong young man. He went on to Fordham University and later to the Wharton School of Finance. After he graduated with a degree in economics, Donald’s father made him work for his real estate business. Donald reflects on his past, saying that …show more content…
One of his major issues discussed in Crippled America is infrastructure. Trump thinks that America’s infrastructure is crumbling to the ground, and the only one that can fix this is him. Rebuilding all of America’s infrastructure will be a very expensive and lengthy process. He complains about our airports looking as if they are from a third world country, that our bridges are deficient, and that we have an overwhelming amount of potholes in our roads. Once these issues are rebuilt and fixed, according to Trump, “America will be beautiful again” (126). Trump is convinced that the money spent on this enormous project to fix America’s infrastructure will in return create jobs, stimulate the economy, and with time, pay for itself. It is estimated by the Senate Budget Committee, that about 13 million jobs will be created by rebuilding our infrastructure. Even though America is at risk of being in even more debt, the more jobs that are created for the American people, the better. With time, money could be circulated back to the government through taxes and cause an economic boom. Trump disregards questions that directly pertain to funding for the project and instead states that the logistics are “too complex for politicians to understand” …show more content…
A tax code that Trump has proposed will give the people what they need most; money. The majority of people live in the middle class, and now in Trump’s new tax policy, all of the middle class will pay less in taxes. The people that work the hardest and need their money the most, will without a doubt be given the right to hold on to more of it. Specifically, if an American is single and making $25,000 or less annually or is married and makes $50,000 or less annually, than they will not owe income tax. This removes 75 million households from paying income taxes. Trump has clearly shown that without a doubt the elite Americans can easily afford a higher taxation, while the hard working middle class can not. Trump’s new simplified tax code will not allow or make room for any loopholes or deductions for special interests and the rich and will be broken down into four brackets. This decrease in middle class taxation will only allow America to grow as a whole; college savings will go up, the economy will boost, and personal debt will go down (153). To grow the economy even more, businesses will pay no more than 15 percent of income taxes. This will move big brand name headquarters back to America. Now, companies are moving their headquarters to other countries to avoid paying such high tax rates here in the U.S. As Trump knows, this

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    According to Washington’s democratic senator Patty Murray, 160,000 middle class workers’ payroll taxes would be cut from 6.2 percent to 3.1 percent. Washington state families making median income would see a tax cut of $1,700 (qtd. in “Murray” 1). The average U.S. family’s tax rate would go down due to the money provided by the higher tax rates of the wealthy. This would be beneficial to the 160,000 workers who would receive double their social security money per year, resulting in almost two thousand dollars back in their pockets.…

    • 1205 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Minimum Wage Amendment

    • 1587 Words
    • 6 Pages

    This is because each year prices rise in consumer products. If the government keeps the federal wage the same each year, then people living on the minimum wage will be unable to compete with the inflation of prices. For minimum wage workers these increases help them in keeping their financial lives in order. The federal minimum wage has lost 7% of its value since it was last raised in 2009. As of 1968 the minimum wage was $1.60 per hour that translates to $10.90 per hour, comparatively higher then today (Raisetheminimumwage.com).…

    • 1587 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Minimum Wage Rejection

    • 1087 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Rejection for Higher Minimum Wage Minimum wage workers deserve minimum wage the way it is now. If the government raises minimum wage then it will just cause the cost of living to go up and decrease the value of the dollar. If minimum wage is increased, then everybody’s wages would eventually rise too and then minimum wage workers would continue to ask for more money because they would end up at the bottom of the chain again. Most people benefitting from a wage increase are not even in poverty. Minimum wage is a good amount right now considering that the amount of people making minimum wage who earned an income at or below the poverty was only 2.7% (Palumbo).…

    • 1087 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    T he dream act will cut the deficit by 1.4 billion and increase the government revenues by 2.3 billion over the next decade. According to a UCLA study the dream act would be able ton add between 1.4 to 3.6 trillion in taxable income to our economy. This is one of the reasons gov Rick Perry supports the dream act because it will make all these immigrants tax payers. Which would benefit the state. Are we going to let these immigrants live in the shadows for the rests of their lives or are we going to make them taxpayers to contribute into our economy?…

    • 814 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Death Tax Debate

    • 851 Words
    • 4 Pages

    This will cause less U.S exports and increase the price of goods in the United States. Trump will also attempt to repeal Obamacare if he’s president which would cost the U.S a massive amount of money if he is successful. If Trump is going to be the president he will implement his five point tax plan. Doing this will save many jobs and businesses due to the death tax being repealed. His plan will increase the total number of entrepreneurs, investors, and jobs because of the decrease in capital gains and dividends taxes.Due to the abolishment of corporate taxes, there will likely cause an increase in the competitiveness of United States corporations and decrease the number of American jobs being outsourced.…

    • 851 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    By making all public colleges free in America it would roughly cost between fifty and thirty billion dollars, which may appear like a mountain of money, specifically taxpayers money; but the government is spending a substantial amount of money on profitable colleges which have extremely low graduation rates (Samuels, 2014). Higher education can be seen to improve the economy immensely. If all 18-24 year olds were enrolled and active in college unemployment would reduce by 2 million people (Samuels, 2014)! A higher educated America would also allow us to become more competitively economically and academically on an international level. Also a more educated work force and educated society would reduce criminal activity, and ensure greater success for the future of America.…

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Capitalist Economy

    • 1128 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Well, No. The system of Capitalism in America is so broken that, in fact, the top 1% of the nation continues to prosper while the bottom 99% flounder. If America is to survive both socially and financially, the wealthy must pay their fair share, or the nation must find a new way to avoid poverty. In 2015 alone, corporate profits rose to nearly 2 trillion dollars nationwide (“Corporate Profits after Tax”), and the average CEO pay was 13.5 million, a nearly 15.6% increase from the previous year (“Executive Paywatch”). While these numbers would sound fantastic to the average seller, they spell doom for the average worker.…

    • 1128 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The presidents thought process was the economic growth from cutting business taxes would expand the jobs in the workplace environment growing to expand the tax base enough to replace any initial loss from tax cuts overall replacing government revenue from the taxes initially cut. President Reagan attempted to tame inflation by shifting it from a fiscal policy to monetary. Other reductions seen within the government under Reagan 's control were spending and regulations on things such as oil, gas, cable, and overseas shipping. (Kiernan, 2004) Although, initially his policy helped inflation the rates that were put into place it begin to put a hardship on economic growth. For approximately 10 months…

    • 786 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    As a way to increase employment company expansions, he urges for larger tax cuts, with some families being able to save up to 35% from current taxes (). The large decreases in taxes Trump wants will also lead to less funding for transfers, such as Social Security (third debate). The republican presidential candidate wants to privatize Social Security, meaning the tax money for Social Security would go to private investment accounts. Trump does agree with Clinton on the stance over employment opportunities for Americans. In the first presidential debate, Donald Trump states, “Our jobs are fleeing the country.…

    • 846 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Flat Tax Hardships

    • 1025 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Hardships on Flat Tax In 2010, the top 20% of the nation 's population owned 85.1% of the nation 's income and 80% of the nation’s population only owned 14.9% of the nation’s wealth. Five years later, the top 1% of the United States nation now owns more additional income than the bottom 90% of the nation 's population. Enacting a flat tax would make people pay the same percentage of their income. Even though a flat tax would enhance the economy 's long-term advancement, a flat tax should not be implemented as the United States new way of taxation because the top wealthiest 1% possess 40% of the nation 's wealth and it penalizes the low-income segment of the population. As of today, the current U.S. tax system, a progressive tax, is a huge…

    • 1025 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays