Analysis Of Civil Disobedience

The Vietnam War remained as one of the most catastrophic evets where the nation was divides. The ones whom disagreed with the war were many and they embraced do their determination because they realized that our leadership had no point sending troop in name of democracy. The movement against war started mostly in Universities, mining that educated young adults were aware of this nonsense. Moreover the cost of war occurred to be too high and the only one benefited from this was manufactories of the armament plus their investors. Indeed, being informed of the problems in our society change the perception of the conformist to rise against injustice. Therefore manifestation or any kind of social disobedience is used to make a call of attention to our leadership.
The ideals of social disobedience were embraced by the nonconformist to express their discontent towards injustice coming from the government. Undeniably, throughout history philosophers, men of faith, and the common used civil disobedience to make a statement bringing changes upon them to enlighten others. However such …show more content…
Perhaps a power used to oppress the minorities and in order to prevent these abuses individual rights have to be granted to everyone. Nevertheless, some leaders do whatever they want without taking in consideration people is opinions. Thoreau mentioned how the “wise man will be useful… and will not submit to be clay.” This in my own word means the awareness concerning of their particular condition may negate their status as part of injustice. Hence, encourage people to do the same regardless the oppressive response to their