Nonetheless, if the book could have included more about the effects that slavery had not just on the people, but the state, the author’s thesis would have seemed more valid as well as given it a bit of longevity. Longevity, in this sense, because Olsen’s arguments just seem to be there, and the inclusion of slavery is such a vital part of the South’s economy as well as its culture, which would have given the audience a bit of a state wide look at a certain institution, like slavery. As can be seen in Olsen’s book, the state of Mississippi was quote different from the border South due to of its political culture of Antipartyism and a so-called Southern code of honor. This can be seen by the author’s mention of how politics were accepted over time, as well as its response to certain issues, like a supposed threat on the moral nature of the South. It can be said that Olsen’s thesis combines these two to show how diverse the political atmosphere of Mississippi was, not to mention
Nonetheless, if the book could have included more about the effects that slavery had not just on the people, but the state, the author’s thesis would have seemed more valid as well as given it a bit of longevity. Longevity, in this sense, because Olsen’s arguments just seem to be there, and the inclusion of slavery is such a vital part of the South’s economy as well as its culture, which would have given the audience a bit of a state wide look at a certain institution, like slavery. As can be seen in Olsen’s book, the state of Mississippi was quote different from the border South due to of its political culture of Antipartyism and a so-called Southern code of honor. This can be seen by the author’s mention of how politics were accepted over time, as well as its response to certain issues, like a supposed threat on the moral nature of the South. It can be said that Olsen’s thesis combines these two to show how diverse the political atmosphere of Mississippi was, not to mention