Carl Von Clausewitz's Paradoxical Trinity

Superior Essays
Clausewitz’s paradoxical trinity Prussian military general and theorist Carl von Clausewitz provided a clear perspective on the character and nature of war through his paradoxical trinity. Clausewitz suggests that war is a timeless paradoxical trinity made up of hatred, violence and enmity; chance and probability, and subordination to rational policy. He suggested that violence is a blind natural force; chance and probability allows the creative spirit to roam; and the subordination as an instrument of policy involving reason. These elements can simply be translated into emotion, chance and reason; or violence, chance and rational calculation. This approach changed the character of warfare from the 18th century monarchic militarism approach …show more content…
Like emotion, rational thought is a product of the individual, but it is different because it entails a conscious process of causing action. Therefore, human reason complements emotion as an element of war as an instrument of policy. The state may use policies developed through a conscious application of reason to address the issues of war – e.g. determining whether to go into war or not. The second element of the trinity is chance and probability, which refers to the external forces that cannot be influenced by human forces desire and reason. They are the realities that military and political actors have to cope with during warfare, including geography, technologies, and economics. Based on the three elements of war, it is clear that Clausewitz’s approach to war is a multidimensional system that requires actors to focus on both human and environmental factors that affect the war. Clausewitz uses the term politic to refer to the politics and policies that come into play when engaging in war. In this regard, political actors should consider use reason, emotion and environmental issues when developing policies related to war and warfare. The forces of reason, environmental factors and violence are essential instruments of unilateral policy which help in addressing problems of …show more content…
During the time of Frederick, the state played a central role in building a strong military to exercise power and control. However, Clausewitz introduced the concept of the trinity which includes new elements in the character of warfare. Clausewitz suggested that warfare is characterized by violence/emotion, uncertainty and reason. This nature involves human and environmental issues such as reason, emotion, and technology in policy implementation on issues related to war. Following this idea, the 19th century approach introduced the human elements of war, suggesting that the state should be involved in a diplomatic and democratic process of seeking the people’s ideas and consent on war based on the prevailing economic, environmental, social and political

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Therefore, if we want to prevent war, leaders should know what is war and inquiry what causes it, why and how war conducted in order to bring solution for nation by eliminating it cause. Moreover, we obviously need theories and principles of war to enhance our judgment of the essence of war and evaluate their current application. Through comprehensive assessment of different theories, we reflect on great intellectuals and fundamental definition of war, on history of great wars, and find how theories work.…

    • 1718 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Clausewitz: Purpose Of War

    • 1183 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Political Objective The political object, as the original motive of the war, will be the standard for determining the two purposes of the armed forces, as well as the number of attempts to be made . This cannot be done by itself; but it is very much connected with both warring states, because we are concerned with reality, not with mere…

    • 1183 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Carin, Gladys Ian T. IRO BA in Political Science In order for a state to survive, it must learn how to communicate with other states. States have different national interest that may contravene with other states and may result into tragedies like war between states and its allies. International relations or IR was created to study and understand relations among states and know the cause of conflict between states so that it could prevent war from happening. International relations try to make foreign relations better so that war may be altered. Foreign relations include trade between nations and how they interact with one another.…

    • 1602 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Brett's War Theory

    • 1500 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Machiavelli, Kautilya, Clausewitz, and Jomini were all strategic thinkers who presented models for describing the nature and character of war. Each of them could certainly be credited with providing insights in statecraft and military power. Each also had insights limited by the context of the conflicts of their times. Subsequent theorists had the advantages of not only reading the works of their predecessors, but also the perspectives of understanding such areas as geopolitics, economic and cultural globalization, global powers, and nationalism. Two such theorists, B.H.…

    • 1500 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rwanda Case Study

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Associated with the means Clausewitz said, to know how much resources should be mobilized in the war, we should see our political objectives and also enemy’s political purposes. Then we have to measure the strength of the enemy situation, including the character and ability of their government and their…

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Assess the Athenians’ argument and actions from the standpoint of pacifism and just war theory. Which position do you find most compelling, and why? Just War theory portrays a practical look at the morality of war in comparison to pacifism, allowing the opportunity to form international procedures and protocol in an attempt to control conflict. During The Peloponnesian War the Athenians offered a valid and in-depth argument on their views of justice in war, over time this has developed into many different perspectives on the place of war in international politics, most noticeably pacifism and just war theory. Pacifism follows the standpoint that all forms of war-making, under every circumstance, is both illegitimate and unjust.…

    • 1608 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    War Argumentative Analysis

    • 1613 Words
    • 7 Pages

    When diplomacy fails, war steps forward. Tensions may escalate dramatically to war until diplomacy works again. Since war is another political instrument, political outcomes should be the motive for the powerful military states to wage, escalate and terminate wars. But sometimes, and despite its military power, these states struggle to reach its political outcomes due to many factors that stand in the way of achieving political outcomes smoothly. For instance, military power restrictions and fear from escalation , strategic vision and mistakes, war predictability, the balance of power and enemy potentials, history, alliances, civil-military relations and domestic support, type of war, and regime type.…

    • 1613 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Defensive realists believe that states will craft reasonable policy, both domestic and foreign, in order to attain security. A defensive realist wants to attain power in order to be able to defend and protect the people residing in the state. Though prioritizing the needs of the state first, a defensive realist is not opposed to allying with other powers if it were to work in their favor. A cause of war for a defensive realist would be an opposing state posing an imminent threat. An example of defensive realism being applied to an event is an event like the Iraq war.…

    • 980 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This is regularly understood as meaning that war is by one means or another a "levelheaded" wonder and Clausewitz is sentenced pushing the fall back on war as a normal expansion of one-sided state strategy. Actually, the decision of interpretation for Politik "strategy" or "legislative issues," demonstrates varying accents with respect to the interpreter, for the two ideas are entirely different. "Policy" might be described as levelheaded activity, keeping in mind the end goal to keep up and boost that power. Governmental issues, is basically the procedure by which power is carried inside a given society. War is a loss of not a substitute for legislative issues.…

    • 1369 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    1. Introduction The issue of anarchic system in international politics is a crucial motive to define the interstates relationship between major theories of international relations. That is, there are diverse theoretical approaches to explicate how actors with a dilemma will behave or react between confrontation and cooperation in the decentralised world, thus understanding major theories such as realism and liberalism would be helpful to size up all possibilities of theoretical alternative in order to surpass anarchy in international politics. The concept of anarchic system, however, should be also examined in underlying perspective for international society prior to understanding the theoretical frames, because the essence of anarchy in the…

    • 2374 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Superior Essays