The authors first examined the relationship between the bid premiums and the narcissism of target CEOs. And the result showed that the positive and significant coefficient for target CEO narcissism indicates that more narcissistic target CEOs obtain higher bid premiums (Nihat Aktas, Eric …show more content…
The result showed that effects of target and acquirer CEO narcissism are significantly opposite to each other except on the probability of deal completion. For deal length, higher degree of acquirer CEO narcissism is significantly associated with shorter takeover processes; higher the target CEO's narcissism relative to the acquirer's, the longer the private takeover length. And the the higher level of narcissism of the CEOs from acquirer companies the faster the process of initiating and negotiating. Moreover, they also noticed that the level of narcissism in either parties is negatively affect the probability of deal completion (Nihat Aktas, Eric de Bodt, Helen Bollaert, Richard Roll, …show more content…
How are variables defined?
CEO narcissism indicator
In previous research, Acquirer CEO narcissism, target CEO narcissism and CEO narcissism ratio were measured by the total number of first person singular pronouns appeared in their speeches, which were used to as CEO narcissism indicator; therefore, I decided to continue using this approach to access the narcissism indicator.
• Acquirer CEO narcissism, target CEO narcissism
• CEO narcissism ratio
Dependent variables:
I decided to only look at the effect on 4 factors, and still follow the Nihat Aktas, Eric de Bodt, Helen Bollaert, Richard Roll’s approach.
• Private takeover process length: The number of months elapsed between the beginning of the deal process and announcement date.
• Bid premium: the 4-week premium: the share price offered by the wining bidder to target shareholders deflated by the price of the target four weeks prior to the announcement