Blaise Pascal's Argument Analysis

Improved Essays
In this essay I will be analyzing Blaise Pascal’s argument that one should bring themselves to believe in God because it is logical to wager or bet “that God is”. I will first outline his three premises of the wager and then I will have a criticism that is held against him.
Specifically, the criticism is towards his second premise which states, “you must wager. It is not optional”. Lastly, I will be responding to that criticism, since I am agreeing with Pascal’s premise. Pascal’s wager consists of the following premises: the first premise is, “If there is a God, He is infinitely incomprehensible”. Pascal is stating that God rather exists or He does not. He says we are not capable of knowing or understanding of who He is. It is impossible to
…show more content…
Ones beliefs involve in what their past experiences and their knowledge of what they think is true, what they think is factual. So, the individuals original belief is that the shirt is purple is by facts that they believe is true. By someone offering money to change the persons “belief” does not work as they fake the belief of the new colour shirt to get a benefit out of it. So, their original belief is still in their mind at the time. This helps prove that the facts individuals are familiar with help them in their decision whether they believe in God existence or not. For one to believe in God’s existence, they look at the facts that show he is indeed real. People refer to the Bible where there is compelling evidence proving his existence. If an individuals believes that there is no existence of God then they turn to other sources like discussing with other atheists to prove why God is not real. Either way, we have to decide if we believe in his existence or not. Blaise Pascal conveys a compelling argument of whether we should believe in God’s existence. Questioning what you think is factual helps in your final decision of believing if God is real or not. His second premise of having to choose and it being not optional is challenging to go against as facts and your own knowledge support in your overall belief system.

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    There are two opposing sides to the argument of faith and the existence of God, evidentialism and non-evidentialism. Evidentialism is believing that it immoral to either form a new belief without sufficient evidence, or to sustain an existing belief by deliberately ignoring doubts and avoiding honest investigation. Non-evidentialism allows for more personal evidence to justify one’s belief. When contrasting the two views my personally beliefs align more with non-evidentialism. British Philosopher and evidentialist, W. K. Clifford, wrote, “The Ethic of Beliefs”.…

    • 1313 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this paper I will explain and evaluate two popular arguments regarding the existence of God, A Scientific Argument for the Existence of God by Robin Collins and The Inductive Argument from Evil Against the Existence of God by William Rowe; then I will discuss how the conclusions are not compatible with one another due to the conflicting structure of the conclusions as well as how one cannot accept both conclusions without compromising one of the arguments. First I will explain the basis of Collins’ argument, which is one of the most frequently used arguments in favor of theism. In A Scientific Argument for the Existence of God, Collins centers around the observation of how finely tuned the physical constants of the universe are to the ability for any form of life to exist, if any of them were to change even the smallest bit then no life would possibly be able to develop not to…

    • 1636 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    James and Pascal’s defences of faith in some of their most famous arguments, specifically Pascal’s, devalue faith by making faith selfish, providing an obvious out to faith, and making the decision of faith into a gamble, oddly, his devaluation of faith does not hurt his argument, it makes it easier to convince the skeptics. To prove that Pascal’s argument devalues faith and to understand why it doesn’t negatively affect his argument, it’s necessary to understand the whole argument. His argument can be split into quite a few premises. He starts with the possibility of God, which is the main idea of his argument. Basically, it’s possible that God does exists, and it’s also possible that God does not exist, something nearly everyone agrees on.…

    • 1025 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    William James’s argument in “The Will to Believe” argues how although religion is not rational, it is sensible. The cause of this discussion was that university students said no free-thinking person should have faith without rationally demonstrating the belief. Religion in this case is defined as having faith in something without sufficient evidence. According to James, having a belief isn’t a choice; people just have them. However, there was a condition to his discussion—we can’t believe in anything we know is false.…

    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Plato's Apology Argument

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Every human being has the ability to decide what they believe and what they do not. At a very early age, we develop judgement that allows us to choose whether or not to accept certain claims. These assertions may be tempting, but our reasoning allows us to critically analyze the information with respect to all of our previous knowledge. These claims may be faith based, fact-based, or opinion. Without recognizing it, we take every bit of information we gather, analyze it, and decide whether we accept its validity.…

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this essay I first outline Pascal’s wager to the existence of God and then evaluate his argument. Pascal argues that one ought to wager “that God is” because “[i]f you gain, you gain all; if you lose, you lose nothing,” and that given this, one can bring oneself to believe in God. I argue that one cannot truly bring themselves to believe in God. Pascal’s argument is set up in three parts. The first part accepts that God is infinitely incomprehensible.…

    • 818 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Pascal's Wager Essay

    • 1056 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Pascal’s wager is, in the Theist 1 culture, a wager for God. Instead, this wager has been used as the opposite. The wager is actually one of three from a French man named Pascal, author of Pensées, who claims these wagers are proof of God’s existence. Pensées is translated into the word “thought” from French. The book is a collection of notes Pascal wrote down.…

    • 1056 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nathaniel Richardson PHIL 3121 Pascal Essay Pascal argues that you should believe in God because if you live a virtuous life and God is real you will have an infinite life in heaven. But if you believe in God and he is not real the only thing you will lose is the pleasures of sin. He believes sin is innate in us as we are born into sin and that is what we ultimately would rather do than live virtuously. On the other if you don’t believe and he is real you will have an infinite life but just in hell.…

    • 357 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    (2) Some people are epistemically rational for not believing in God. (3) Therefore, God does not exist.” (Cullison, 2010, p. 119).…

    • 1517 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Although after careful consideration it essentially fails to properly carry out its purpose, it is still considered one of the greatest philosophical arguments for a belief in God. Pascal begins with this fact, “...it is certain, that either there is a God, or there is not; there can be no medium.” (Pascal 35). Next, both…

    • 1453 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pascal explains that a person should choose to believe in God because they may receive infinite benefits. He does not assume that god exists, but rather asserts that a person should place a bet on his existence. If a person believes in God, and God does exist, they may be infinitely rewarded in the afterlife. But, Pascal also acknowledges that there are drawbacks to believing in god’s existence. Through religious belief, a person is unable to engage in sins, leading to a possible finite cost.…

    • 730 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Ontological Argument and Pascal’s Wager The “Ontological Argument” was created by Saint Anselm; this argument is in support of God’s existence. His argument is one based on observation and reason not on empirical evidence and is spit in to three parts. The parts include why god exists, why god cannot be thought to not exist, and lastly why atheists are able to think that God does not exist. In the first section he begins with a definition of God that he believes everyone would be accepting of and that cannot be disputed.…

    • 1583 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pascal's Wager

    • 246 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Pascal argues that we cannot use reason to establish God's existence; he either exists, or he does not, but it is prudent to believe in his existence than to not believe. More specifically, Pascal's wager suggests, if God does not exist, there is nothing to lose by belief, and nothing to gain by disbelief. On the contrary, if God does exist, belief offers infinite reward to heaven, whereas disbelief leads to infinite punishment in hell. Therefore, believing in God is the only rational choice. I disagree with Pascal's theory.…

    • 246 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Within the objection, it is proposed that the Christian “God,” the one that Pascal indirectly refers to, does not exist and that there is another god who punishes those who believe in the Christian “God” and rewards those who do not believe in the Christian “God.” The payoff for either god would be the same as discussed previously, where each of the possible gods is equally probable, than there is no reason to take the side of Pascal. Because there are many possible gods, there is no more of a reason to believe in Pascal’s God than any other god. There are many flaws in Pascal’s Wager that are identifiable. Such as, Pascal’s Wager only offers the belief in one God, whereas today there are thousands of gods and religions in the world.…

    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Faith in religión restored his sanity later making him believe that there is more to life than rational belief. 13. Explain and evaluate Pascal’s Wager. Would belief based on such an argument get you into heaven? Pascal’s Wager is the idea that the benefit in believing in God outweighs the risks of not believing.…

    • 1383 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays