Analysis Of Ban The Things Ban Them All By Molly Ivins

Improved Essays
When it comes to the topic of guns, many people have their own opinions. An article in particular, "Ban the things. Ban them all." written by Molly Ivins, comes to mind. In her article, Ivins expresses her dislike towards firearms in which I find agreements and disagreements of my own.

In Ivins article, she explicitly states her dislike toward guns and I feel like her article is for anyone to read but that it is geared more towards gun enthusiats. Ivins primary topic in her article was about the dangers of guns and why we should ban them. In no way during her article do you feel as though you have to guess what Ivins beliefs are geared towards. Ivins introductions alone shows her feelins as she states that guns are bad and knvies are better.

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    There are many other variables in addition to the idea of freedom that is discussed, which can profoundly affect how an individual perceives guns. The article also lacks an emphasis on how the current gun control laws have allowed for events like the Sandy Hook shootings to take place, or how changing the laws would threaten the freedom that gun owners fiercely protect. Additionally, his focus on freedom is not very convincing. Many points are highly speculative and do not reference any “concrete” data that would justify her reasons for discussing these…

    • 1047 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The second persuasive point made is stronger gun laws will keep guns out of the wrong hands. In this article the author stated some supportive evidence “Because of this private sale loophole, convicted felons and other prohibited people are able to buy guns” this is logical because criminals find ways to obtain guns one way or another and “Studies have shown that a gun in the home increases the risk of firearm related death or injury” this logical because guns in a home increases the risk of an accident. The authors concluding idea is that they want gun control laws to be much more strict in terms of not just selling to anyone, but to also perform a background check and to make sure they are able to posses a gun legally and…

    • 620 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The article has a good and bad reactions to many who believe and disbelieve in gun control. This source is credible since it indicates history/truths and is significant to my point since it has to do with gun control and how it sways individual’s outlook with this issue. 2. Olsen, Scott. "…

    • 1112 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Agree to Disagree What is the first thing that comes to mind when you hear the word “gun”? Gun rights, protection, hunting, or gun violence, school shootings and terrorist attacks. These topics are highly controversial in today’s society.…

    • 882 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Annotated Bibliography: Gun Control Everyone has their opinion over Guns, many believe it’s ok to have guns but others disagree. But many have guns for protection, I understand people abuse the power on having guns and commit a crime. Many shootings have occurred this year and last year.…

    • 1103 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the article, “Confessions of a Liberal Gun Owner,” Justin Cronin, a liberal award-winning novelist and a professor at Rice University, describes the experiences he has underwent during in his life that caused his beliefs of gun control. Cronin wrote this article after a shooter entered an elementary school and killed 27 innocent people. He believes it is too easy for Americans to buy guns, but he also believes many people who are against guns do not look at the reality of gun control. They want to make unreasonable changes that are near impossible. Cronin is knowledgeable when it comes to guns since he owns six pistols that are all semi automatic.…

    • 1274 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mass Shootings

    • 734 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This response is bold, and stirs up many emotions, though offers a more visceral explanation which is the goal of such editorial pieces. Other politicians such a Jeb Bush offered their opinions, providing examples of what should and should not be done regarding gun regulation. “A child drowns in a poll and the impulse is to pass a law that puts fencing around pools… you’re imposing on large numbers of people… harder for people to protect liberty.” (Republicans Accept Mass Killings. Gun Control Advocates, Get Graphic, 2015).…

    • 734 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    A lot of these opinions come about due to emotional reasons such a personal tragedy of having a loved one lost due to a shooting and then we have ones who have not endured a personal tragedy such as this which makes it hard to empathize with the opposing position, which in turn can cause a lot of resentment on both sides. One thing is for certain, the back and forth constant arguments typically only hinder the process of finding a solution. Instead of letting personal experiences, biasness, and emotions interfere with logical thinking, it is imperative for the American people to look at the statistical data and the facts about guns in America in order to reach a mutual decision on how to improve safety while also not taking away the freedom to own a…

    • 1632 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Gun Control does not prevent Gun Violence Gun control is a very controversial topic especially in today's society; whether gun control is good or bad is a very talked about subject especially when it comes to the United States. This is a very touchy subject because guns are a part of a lot of people's daily lives. People that are anti gun control believe that no one should be able to put any restrictions on guns. They believe that people should be able to buy a firearm just like a pair of boots or a tool. They also believe that if you take firearms away from the law abiding citizens that just leaves firearms in the hands of people that don't abide by the law and leaves them defenseless.…

    • 1884 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Russ Shafer-Landau provides us with an article by Jeff McMahan in order to give us an analytical argument on gun control. Jeff McMahan, in his article Why Gun Control Isn’t Enough, discusses why he believes guns should not simply be controlled in the United States, rather they should be banned. McMahan makes the case that gun ownership, in its entirety, is dangerous and illogical. Through several examples and through his own reasoning, McMahan hopes to convince the reader that the only way forward on the topic of ‘guns’ in the United States is to completely ban civilians from owning traditional firearms, from the ground up. Through my counter-argument, I intend to show that while McMahan’s argument is versed well on intent, it is mostly normative,…

    • 1297 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout history, citizens in the United States have used guns to protect themselves, their families, and their nation. As Americans sit down to watch the news each day, they are witness to an increasing number of shootings in many different forms, which range from schools to live interviews. The right to bear arms is guaranteed by the second amendment in the Bill of Rights. However, there are some citizens who believe that if stricter laws are put into place regarding gun control, their second amendment rights will be violated. So, what is too far and what is not?…

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the past few decades, firearms have had a big impact on society. These impacts have been both good and evil, and have caused controversy on the topic of gun ownership. Some groups, such as the Brady Campaign, would like to see gun control laws take away some rights and restrict others, whereas the National Rifle Association would like to protect gun rights and educate society on the use of firearms. Both sides want to stop the problem of gun violence, but protecting gun rights is the only way to truly insure public safety. Gun control will not be able to stop the use of guns, and it will put citizens in an unfair situation where they cannot protect themselves.…

    • 1808 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gun control is a topic that divides the opinions of the United States citizens and creates endless discussions that until now has not reached a conclusion. The United States has faced many mass shootings during the last years making the supporters of gun control want a reform even more. Guns are responsible for over thirty-three thousand deaths in the United States every year. The United States leads the world with more gun-related homicides and suicides than any other country, according to a 2016 study conducted by the American Journal of Medicine. (“Gun Control”).…

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In “Confessions of a Liberal Gun Owner”, author James Cronin explains why he, despite being a liberal, believes in and exercises his gun ownership rights. This essay, in particular, is quite intriguing due to the fact a liberal is supporting the second amendment. The title alone draws in a diverse crowd because it is somewhat paradoxical in today's divided political spectrum. The personal crisis that leads to the author’s support of gun ownership enlightens and resonates with nearly all readers. In “Confessions of a Liberal Gun Owner”, Cronin successfully presents a persuasive argument for firearms that is convincing to both liberals and conservatives alike.…

    • 1109 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In recent years, a lot of debate had been going on about the laws pertaining to firearms. Unfortunately, with all of the mass shootings and killings being reported by the media, guns are given a bad reputation. Sadly, many people believe that they should be illegal because they are dangerous and can kill people, but what these people don’t realize is making them illegal will do a lot more harm than good. Guns have created a balance in society and if we were to take them away it could cause a lot of chaos which would result in more crime and more casualties. People deserve the right to bear arms because with proper training one could possibly save his/her life and also protect others.…

    • 918 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays