Analysis Of Arthur Miller's Get It Right: Privatize Executions

Decent Essays
In Arthur Miller’s compelling essay, Get it Right: Privatize Executions, he conveys his perspective on public executions and mocks society. As a matter of fact, public executions are not an out-moded subject that has caused disputable opinions. Executions that can be viewed by the public was once a legal practice and a part of history in the United States. Surprisingly, in some coun-tries around the world public executions is viewed as the norm in their culture. It was not unusual for some society’s to be entertained such gruesome executions. In fact, lynching was a popular form in America used to dehumanize the offender and to use him or her as a lesson for the com-munity to beware of the consequences. As a result, displaying the executed …show more content…
Although criminals had made unforgivable mistakes they should not be paraded or dehumanized for the sake of society’s entertainment. So-ciety should never dehumanize other people for the sole purpose of amusement. The offender’s final moments of suffering should not be for the enjoyment of society. Also, culture will be ulti-mately desensitized and be left without any empathy or compassion if public executions will be the norm of the culture. The public will have no sense of morals and will no longer view criminals as humans, but as savages ready to be terminated from society. In addition, perverseness plays a big part of allowing such unethical actions to be accepted. Although every individual has their inner perverseness and cruel desires it should not be expressed in a form of brutal entertainment. If such brutal actions are allowed society will be nothing more than the cruel past people have endured. According to Miller, society has become a subject of satire and ridicule. To emphasize, by mocking society of their utter habit to repeat actions that were inhumane to mankind, it proves that public executions will be no different. The outrageous forms of brutality inflicted on people should not be repeated but it has not been completely discontinued. Public executions has been changed into a practice that people have foolishly accepted. It is evident in Miller’s essay that he will never understand why society adapts to these kinds of horrendous laws all the name of jus-tice. To this end, public executions will be a new form of contemporary brutality and entertain-ment for the society to

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Repeal Capital Punishment

    • 2254 Words
    • 9 Pages

    This should be the start in stopping the Death Penalty because it 's morally wrong just like murdering is but just because it 's run by the government and the justice system doesn’t make it okay! It is unavoidably evident, that ethnic discrimination racial bias, apartheid, is all a part of the administration of capital punishment in America. (Bedau, Cassell) This is saying that racism in Capital Punishment is unavoidable, no matter what in this world today the minorities and poor won’t ever get the benefit of the doubt. It means that even though racism happens right in front of people they act as nothing happens. This help proves how inhumane this country in the way it is running.…

    • 2254 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Governments should not violate those human rights because they are the ones who should protect the people. Saving the innocent people shouldn't be a valuable excuse to torture someone. Torture is unethical, inhumane, an insufficient way to gather information, and society should never allow…

    • 1387 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    As a result, they gave Aaron McKinney and Russell Henderson the impression that Matthew being gay is unacceptable to the society. So they attacked and murdered Matthew without even thinking if it is morally correct or wrong to do as they already felt that homosexuals behave immorally. Although some people do not accept homosexual in their belief, but they have no authority to take away someone’s life. The message of being open-minded should be spread through the world to stop…

    • 1069 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    No one force them to do an unlawful action; the only one that can is themselves. It essentially ignores the primary deviance and seriously underestimates the influence that other variable have on the person behavior instead, it focus on the future occurrence. The labeling theorists pay too much on the process on the labeling and forgotten the cause of the action. Anyone can try and fight the label that is given to them and redefine themselves. The labeling theory had made it more difficult to compare studies and generalizes finding on why individual committed crime.…

    • 1427 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Actually I do not want to say that all mentally handicapped people should be exposed to the death penalty because it is not good for rule of society and humanity. However, some people pose fatal danger to the society in highly an inhumane way, like as this example. In such a way, the death penalty becomes crucial for the benefit of the society. I claim each criminal, do not care how inhuman s/he is, and should be given the minimum one chance to modification him/herself. So, I do not recommend the death penalty for people who have done only one killing.…

    • 1259 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Stephen reclaims that we as humans have respect for human dignity, we can punish people for their crimes but we can’t deprive them of everything, which the death penalty does. With the death penalty it’s basically saying to that convict that your life is basically worthless and has no human value. Nathanson believes we are not in any right position to affirm that to anyone. The main reason why this is such a big dispute is that people think a murderer has forfeited is rights as a human being, or morally free to kill him or her. To me though they do forfeit some of their rights but at the same time they are still a human being like the rest of us.…

    • 1274 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Torture and cruel treatment is banned at all times, places, and including times of war (Torture). It is a terrible thing that still exists in some countries. People use it either to get information from people or to just hurt the person involved. We as people should not defend torture, because it is hurting people to get something. What is the reason that it is done?…

    • 880 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    William H. Shaw argues from a utilitarian perspective and argues that retributivism is not morally right. He claims that the death penalty will have no benefits towards society and that it will just cause a cycle of violence. Shaw focuses on the future effects and believes in modifying a person’s behavior. To others, retributivism is a way of revenge; however retributivism does not have to do with hatred, but justice. In addition, there are arguments on whether or not an eye for an eye is truly practiced because other than murder, we do not rape rapists for their crimes and also we do not truly know if the criminal suffers equally or more than the victim; however the victim does not deserve all the pain and suffering whereas the criminal does.…

    • 1465 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Labelling Theory

    • 1011 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Question 1 Social constructionists suggest that suggests social problems arise from the views and values of the society and its context. For example, murder is seen as wrong and is illegal in everyday life; however, when it comes to wars killing other people is seen as heroic and necessary. This is an example of how the social problem can change because a lot of the time it comes down to context. Another example is that not all actions seen as deviant are illegal. It is legal to get a tattoo or a facial piercing but some people would raise an eyebrow at that as a form of informal punishment.…

    • 1011 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Modern Capital Punishment

    • 1058 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Many people have condemned capital punishment, as well as praised it. Beccaria (2010), a classical philosopher on the death penalty, heavily critiqued the entire process entailing capital punishment. His key argument is that capital punishment does not prevent the offenders, but in its place, the long-term detention makes a long lasting impression on the attention of the audience. In addition, the death penalty has injurious impacts on the society by minimizing the sensitivity to human suffering. The proponents argue that if the law was just left to be open and allow the criminals to be treated equal then, it will be very dangerous to the public (Masur,1989).…

    • 1058 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays

Related Topics