Analysis Of Arthur Miller's Get It Right: Privatize Executions

Superior Essays
In Arthur Miller’s compelling essay, Get it Right: Privatize Executions, he conveys his perspective on public executions and mocks society. As a matter of fact, public executions are not an out-moded subject that has caused disputable opinions. Executions that can be viewed by the public was once a legal practice and a part of history in the United States. Surprisingly, in some coun-tries around the world public executions is viewed as the norm in their culture. It was not unusual for some society’s to be entertained such gruesome executions. In fact, lynching was a popular form in America used to dehumanize the offender and to use him or her as a lesson for the com-munity to beware of the consequences. As a result, displaying the executed …show more content…
Although criminals had made unforgivable mistakes they should not be paraded or dehumanized for the sake of society’s entertainment. So-ciety should never dehumanize other people for the sole purpose of amusement. The offender’s final moments of suffering should not be for the enjoyment of society. Also, culture will be ulti-mately desensitized and be left without any empathy or compassion if public executions will be the norm of the culture. The public will have no sense of morals and will no longer view criminals as humans, but as savages ready to be terminated from society. In addition, perverseness plays a big part of allowing such unethical actions to be accepted. Although every individual has their inner perverseness and cruel desires it should not be expressed in a form of brutal entertainment. If such brutal actions are allowed society will be nothing more than the cruel past people have endured. According to Miller, society has become a subject of satire and ridicule. To emphasize, by mocking society of their utter habit to repeat actions that were inhumane to mankind, it proves that public executions will be no different. The outrageous forms of brutality inflicted on people should not be repeated but it has not been completely discontinued. Public executions has been changed into a practice that people have foolishly accepted. It is evident in Miller’s essay that he will never understand why society adapts to these kinds of horrendous laws all the name of jus-tice. To this end, public executions will be a new form of contemporary brutality and entertain-ment for the society to

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Lynching or trial by mob has been a popular way to punish upstarts in America for hundreds of years. According to history and legend, Judge Charles Lynch, was the first to coin the term for the practice in North America; during the mid-1700s. This method, rule and trial by mob, has been recorded throughout history; since the dawn of man. Whether you look at the mob that sent Christ to the cross or the pogroms in imperial Russia in the 1800s, this method of justice is timeless. In the piece “Lynch Law in America”, by Ida B. Wells, Mrs. Wells presents to the audience, a problem.…

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Introduction Capital punishment has been a topic of much debate for many years with very differing points of view. Much of the research done about capital punishment is based on the public opinions, making it an issue close to peoples morals and idealistic thought. The news media then caters to the leaning of the public’s morals. In dealing with capital punishment, the news media tends to focus on three different popular mentalities; the ‘eye for an eye’ mentality, punishment should fit the crime mentality, and the declaring it inhumane treatment of individuals mentality. By focusing on these three views, the media has been able to help inform the public according to the prevailing view of the individual case.…

    • 1636 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Executions Should Be Televised,” is an essay that was written by Zachary Shemtob and David Lat. Shemtob and Lat makes an argument on whether or not executions should be televised. Although others argue against it being televised, the two writers do explain why it should be in their opinion. The reasons why it should televised is for those that are concern to witness whether or not lethal injection causes any painful sufferings and also the people should have the rights to see what is being done in their name and tax dollars with their own eyes rather than having to read about what journalists think or vaguely describe using the morning paper. This is a brief summary of the essay; Shemtob and Lat start off by talking Georgia’s third execution that would have passed unnoticed.…

    • 822 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Stephen Bright writes his essay highlighting factors which he believes are reasoning for abandoning the practice of death sentences. These reasons include the violation of human rights, as well as arbitrary and unfair inflictions. Unfortunately, Stephen…

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The main form of the death penalty used in today’s society would be lethal injection, as it is considered the most humane method. Up until that point the main method used was the electric chair. In Sherman Alexie’s poem, “Capital Punishment”, he aims at the idea of the electric chair. Alexie describes…

    • 1446 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The death penalty is the most severe form of current legal punishment. The question that is hotly debated is if this form of legal punishment is just and necessary. Hugo Bedau argues that capital punishment is not ethically acceptable. On the other hand, Ernest Van Den Haag argues that this penalty is completely necessary. This paper will summarize both opinions and give two reasons why the death penalty should be abolished, both from a ethical point of view and from a practical perspective.…

    • 1410 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The author’s point of this article was to give insight to the controversial view points on the death penalty, being in favor of those who deserve the capital punishment and opposed to those who do not deserve it, and argues that until the death penalty is not justified even without uncertainty to those that deserve it, and the moral deterrence is abolished from those that favor it, the argument against it will never…

    • 578 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Death Penalty Texas

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Not all the cases with death sentences is right, “I don't want to put one innocent person to death to put 99 that are guilty to death,” said Gary Johnson (Johnson 1). In addition, the cost of it is also excessively expensive; therefore, this solution is not as good as its definition. The death penalty has its impacts to the criminal behavior of people as the result of reducing crime rates since it was re-instituted. One can say keep it but only for a symbol. Life is precious, and no one has the right to end other’s…

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Shemtob And Lat Analysis

    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Making Executions Public An execution, in the United States, can be authorized for a convicted criminal in five forms, including lethal injection, which is used in 33 states for an execution. A few states authorize an execution by electrocution, gas chamber, hanging, or firing squad. Shemtob and Lat offer a strong case about public executions, including, when a convict is executed the people have a constitutional right and responsibility to ensure that the convict on death row is administered a procedure that is humane. Shemtob’s and Lat’s essay adamantly argues for public executions for all the people to observe, not just news media and selected observers. Shemtob and Lat support this view because the people have a responsibility to know how all executions unfold.…

    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The death penalty has been around for many years. It has been a controversial argument in the American society. According to the Webster Dictionary death penalty means the decision by a court of law that the punishment for someone’s crime will be death (Webster Dictionary). Over the years people have wondered many times what is the death penalty is, how this punishment works, and who qualify to receive such punishment. Many people are unaware of this social problem; it could be for many reasons.…

    • 453 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Executions Made Public Public executions are a form of capital punishment often used to deal with criminals who have committed severe offences. Executions being made public is something that has been occurring throughout time all across the world. The earliest recorded public execution took place back in the 16th century,when a nobleman, who was accused of using magic, was condemned to death and forced to take his own life (Reggio 1). The idea of making executions public is something used in monarchy, in order to show power and authority over it’s people.…

    • 1155 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Capital Punishment: an Act of Justice or Revenge? To many, executing the offender of a heinous and violent murder is seen as an act of justice and retribution, and is an essential aspect of maintaining moral balance, however, perhaps the stronger and more substantial position is that the death penalty is a barbarous act of revenge, motivated by emotion rather than logic. According to the “Retributive Justice Theory” those who break the law deserve to suffer punishment, and likewise, deserve to be punished in proportion to the crime committed.…

    • 1554 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Since earlier times, deviance has been prominent in society. Overtime offenses have gradually been taken more seriously due to a better understanding on the reasoning of crime. Although criminologists theorize the origin of crime, it is still a blurry line on whether the perpetrator should physically be held accountable for his or her life. This ideology can date back to the Code of Hammurabi, where corporate punishment was a form of discipline. Corporate punishment consisted of inflicting any physical pain onto the perpetrator that was measured to the offense.…

    • 1202 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of the most debated ethical issues throughout the entire history of man, has been capital punishment (death penalty). Is it necessary, and more importantly, is it moral to put someone to death for a crime which they have committed? This questions has been raised and debated in every country and at every period of time, as far back as known history will allow us to observe. This paper will present and discuss the dilemma of capital punishment on ethical grounds and present arguments both for and against capital punishment. This paper will also look at the history and evolution of capital punishment, as well as attempt to gauge what will become of the practice in the foreseeable future.…

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Adrianna Coffee Dr. Huck GSTR 110 Capital Punishment The death penalty should never be applied as a punishment to a person convicted of intentionally killing another person because the death penalty is a costly, unfair punishment that does not benefit society as a whole. What is the death penalty? The death penalty is defined as “the punishment of execution, administered to someone legally convicted of a capital crime.” (Definition of Death Penalty in English) Since 1976 there have been over fourteen hundred executions in the United States.…

    • 1379 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics