Medea And Aristotle: The Tragedy Of Free Will

Improved Essays
Medea, a Greek tragedy written by Euripides, is a tragedy about love and betrayal. Her husband Jason betrayed her. The only way to get back at her husband is to kill her own children. There are two philosophers in particular that can relate to Medea and the actions that she has chosen. One of these philosophers being Aristotle and the other philosopher being Augustine. Both of these philosophers share similar views on free will that would blame Medea for her actions. Aristotle’s view on free will is based on voluntary and involuntary actions. He believes that only voluntary actions deserved to be praised or to be blamed (Aristotle, PP). In Medea’s case, she is to be blamed for her actions. Aristotle would argue that since Medea knew voluntarily …show more content…
Augustine’s view on free will is that he does not blame the devil for there being evil in the world. He blames people because he believes that your own free will is what makes your actions your own and he believes that you are responsible for the actions that you have chosen. “When the will turns away from the unchangeable and common good toward its own private good, or toward external or inferior things, it sins”(Free will, 25). When Medea killed her children, Augustine, would not blame the devil for Medea for her indescribable actions. He would blame her because she consciously made those decisions on her own and he would hold her responsible for her actions. Augustine believes that God has the foreknowledge to know what we are going to do. God knew that Medea was going to kill her children but could not stop her otherwise from committing her sin. God’s power of foreknowledge does not take away Medea’s free will because even though he knows what she is going to do, she still the free will to do what she wants. Despite the fact that God has the power of foreknowledge and people still commit sins, How come Medea still committed a sin? (Augustine, PP) One can argue that sin is a necessity in the world. Without sin, there would be no good in the world and God gave us this free will to do whatever we wanted to do with it. Sin is necessary in the world to keep the fulcrum between good and evil balanced (Coe). …show more content…
Even though they have slightly different versions of what they believe free will is, they both believed that everyone has free will and had the ability to do whatever they chose to do with it. Medea had the free will to commit the actions that she acted upon. Both of these men would have held Medea responsible for the killing of her own children and would both agree that Medea used her free will in the wrong

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    How Did Jason Betray Medea

    • 1103 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Jason believes that Medea’s suffering was caused by her own hand. If she had been less emotional about everything, the whole situation would not have ended on such bad terms. Medea’s exile, which was caused by her cursing the royal family, thirst for revenge and betrayal, and death of the princess, was justified by the chorus who is still loyal to her. The logical argument comes from the chorus whose position is that there is no reason that justifies slaughtering her own children. The chorus has to eventually beg the Gods for Medea to stop and have her reconsider her decision to murder her children.…

    • 1103 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Medea Rhetorical Analysis

    • 351 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Through the interactive orals, I have a better understanding of Medea’s rage and her position as a God. In the play, Medea’s anger was justified because her husband takes another wife. Which makes others and me sympathetic towards her. Even though, knowing that Medea lets her passion rule her actions. However, in the interactive oral: Jason and the Argonauts, I found out that Hera convinces Aphrodite to send her son, Cupid, to a love arrow at Medea for she was a skilled sorceress capable of helping Jason obtain the Golden fleece.…

    • 351 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Love In Medea's Tragedy

    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages

    I think the parallel usage of texts enhanced the spellbinding and pitifulness of Medea. However, in the anyalectial paper, I would like to talk about the presentation of love from Medea was actually selfish and personal, even she appeared to more pathetic and gooey. In her perception, love was to give everything she thought Jason wanted no matter what the consequences are, she could not think critically before engaging her actions. In the play, Jason did not complain or comment on her actions until Medea was mad and yelled at Jason regarding to what she has done for her that made her became an enemy of her family, betrayed Pelias’ daughter, left all her friends and homeland.…

    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Does Medea Love Creon

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages

    She endured great misfortunes at the cost of loving Jason, and thus dedicates the remainder of her life towards destructing Jason. Medea’s actions are notably irrational and unjustifiable. Although her plan succeeded, she didn’t accomplish anything, but the satisfaction of serving Jason’s misery at the expense of her children’s lives. Medea’s appetite for vengeance led to the deterioration of herself. Her greatest personality flaw is her inability to forgive and move on.…

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Nestorius

    • 1281 Words
    • 6 Pages

    This means God foreknows everything including our future acts. The question then is how can we have free will when God knows everything. Augustine, in a form of a dialog, argues that free will and God’s foreknowledge are compatible. He refute the idea that God’s activity puts freedom at risk and that our free choices are free from God’s activity. Human beings can choose one particular action from among various alternatives.…

    • 1281 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to Hick, the Augustinian approach hinges solely on man’s fall from morality, which has led to the disharmony of nature (pg.358). The free will defense strives to support the view that God, the omnipotent being he/she has been constructed to be, has granted man the freedom to choose between “right” and “wrong”, no longer holding the responsibility of the occurrence of evil. The man’s choice to “choose” evil and has given rise to the misuse of this freedom furthering degrading the society in which we live. Hick describes the “fall from grace” or temptation to commit evil acts is labeled by Augustine as the flaw of man lacks plausibility and speaks to the inconsistency of the free will defense. Arguably, the question arises that why would a God that is all-powerful allow for the decay and death of his creation, permitting evil to enter the physical…

    • 777 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Augustine Free Will

    • 692 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Saint Augustine’s book The City of God talks about the idea of free will and whether humans are truly able to exhibit the idea of free will if God knows all the can possibly happen. During the time of St. Augustine and still to this day many question if humans really are able to exhibit free will, but instead are subject to the will of God. St. Augustine instead perched the idea that humans do exhibit free will, whether it be through the wills of God or against it. St. Augustine argues that it is true God knows all the possibilities that a person could live but it is still up to the person to decide what they do and though God tries to push you towards the best possible solution the human still has the decision to choose what he wants. God…

    • 692 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Evodius believes that the certainty of God’s foreknowledge makes it impossible for an individual to act otherwise, which conflicts with an individual’s ability to choose what they desire freely. Augustine explains that this is incorrect as “God himself has enabled [ individuals] reason to think” (38b), allowing individuals the ability to decide for themselves. “God’s foreknowledge, which is certain…, does not take away [from an individual’s] will” (57a), but instead makes it “all the more certain” (57b). This statement contradicts itself as it illustrates that no matter the choices made by the individual the final outcomes will be similar to the outcomes foreknown by God due to his possession of divine foreknowledge. Thus, for this reason, free choice of will and God’s divine foreknowledge are inconsistent as the divine knowledge possessed by God is what ultimately what determines the future of the individual as it is the tool that assures the occurrence of an individual’s…

    • 852 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Around 430 B.C., an Athenian tragedian, Sophocles, wrote the play Oedipus Rex. Capturing the complexity of human consciousness, Sophocles pitted fate and free will against one another in order to make the tragic fall of Oedipus impactful to the audience by invoking a sense of pity and sadness for his character. It can be argued that in this play, individual free will instead of fate was the dominant factor that made Oedipus a tragic hero because of his sharp decline from beloved king to disgraced murderer. Fate can be defined in numerous ways, according to Sophocles; it had “terrible power. You cannot escape it by wealth or war.…

    • 1269 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Gilgamesh believes that he is immortal and cannot die therefore the people of Uruk ask the Sumerian gods to create an individual equal to Gilgamesh. Enkidu was created the Gods of wisdom Enlil, Ea gave Gilgamesh the fate to see visions in his dream, and he knew Enkidu was coming and he was to love him as a woman. Gilgamesh and Enkidu became great friends and decided together to conquer the world together and to live forever, to have mortality. Upon the death of his companion realization became apparent to Gilgamesh that death will always come, which is something Gilgamesh has to understand, it becomes so with the death of his friend Enkidu, there is no such thing as immortality, and friendship is crucial in life. Fate is not of our own doing but the doing of others and freewill gives us the decisions to make choices in our lives.…

    • 1029 Words
    • 5 Pages
    • 1 Works Cited
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Upon being betrayed by husband Jason, who married another woman while still wed to Medea, this heartbroken woman experiences emotional suffering that many worldwide, throughout history and today, can relate to. Presented to the audience is a woman who gave up her family and home, betraying her father and killing her brother, to be with her conceivable true love, who ultimately betrays such love and trust to marry for his own means. At this point, it is effortless for the audience to sympathise with Medea’s grief. Medea believes herself to be removed from the human experience through her magic and divine connections but as her evident emotional suffering deepens, her mental state escalates to the point where she commits unforgivable acts, namely, killing a young Princess and her own two children, to cope with her emotional pain, it becomes increasingly difficult to understand her mental suffering.…

    • 1130 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Free will, without which no one can live rightly, is a good and divine gift.” (Augustine 65). In the book, On the Free Choice of the Will, Augustine argues that humanity’s will, which is given by God, is indeed free. As the book proclaims, free will is something that has the ability to produce righteousness and happiness; it is a gift that produces peace and prosperity. Yet, at the same time, there is the possibility of the will to be fixed on the all too enticing temptations of this world.…

    • 1320 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In many cases life simply is not fair and it has a way of throwing some in a cave full of lions left with no choice but to fight in order to survive. No matter how perfect a person might try to be we make mistakes it is simply inevitable. I believe that we are born free of sin. In life we make choices that whether they are good or not they tend to mark…

    • 1196 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Both of them have reason to be upset, and both of them decide to do something about it. Although their actions aren’t moral, they do successfully get revenge on their husbands. The fact that both of them seek revenge of their husbands elevates their transgressive qualities because it shows that both of them can destroy the man who supports them in life. The interesting difference between the two of them is that Clytemnestra kills her husband because he killed their child, while Medea kills her children because her husband left her. This elevates Clytemnestra as a mother but diminishes Medea as…

    • 1056 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Medea feels that it is her duty to do what she feels was best for her family and just. She preforms her horrible actions largely, because she feels that Jason has betrayed his duty. Sophocles explains, “The father does not love his sons, but –his new wedding bed,” Medea followed her duty and behaved properly to Jason, until she was betrayed. This is explained by, “[Medea] was in everything Jason 's perfect foil, being in marriage that saving thing: a wife who does not go against her man,” Also, Sophocles suggest that Medea had to seek revenge because she felt Jason betrayed his duty. This is suggested when Medea pleas, “I even bore you sons—just to be discarded for a new bride.…

    • 1601 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays