Angelina Grimké evoked an amalgamation of criticism and commendation from numerous sources through the composition of her infamous “Appeal to the Christian Women of the Southern States.” In her 1836 appeal, Angelina ardently refuted the South’s biblical argument for slavery by examining numerous biblical laws relating to slavery and servitude. Additionally, Angelina daringly entreated her female peers to educate themselves on the subject of slavery and its monstrous evils. By urging them to examine the politics and ideologies behind the institution of slavery, Angelina Grimké fundamentally encouraged southern women to venture beyond the educational boundaries that Western society had predetermined for them. Thus, Angelina brilliantly utilized
…show more content…
Angelina was also permanently barred from Charleston and threatened with mob violence, arrest, and imprisonment if she dared to venture into the city; subsequently, neither Angelina nor Sarah ever visited Charleston again. Although Angelina was exceedingly saddened by the South’s violent reactions to her appeal, and undoubtedly convinced that she had “sacrificed any friend I thought I had,” she concurrently believed that the abolitionist cause was “a cause worth dying for.” Additionally, the Philadelphia Society of Friends responded to the appeal by permanently disowning the Grimké sisters for publicly propagating their radical and dangerous anti-slavery philosophies. However, the “Appeal to the Christian Women of the Southern States” was enthusiastically received throughout the North, and rapidly published in numerous antislavery papers and reform journals. Furthermore, numerous, radical abolition groups vigorously praised Angelina Grimké for her fearless courage, and zealously labeled her as a crusader for African Americans and …show more content…
However, their roles as female leaders within the abolitionist movement were considered highly controversial and ultimately “obscured the remarkable accomplishments of their mission.” Additionally, the Grimké sisters’ outspoken critiques of racial and gender inequality alienated them from various religious organizations and conservative abolitionist groups, and deprived them of crucial support in the North. Furthermore, there were numerous abolitionists who blamed Sarah and Angelina Grimké for the eventual split in the abolitionist movement because “their actions heightened conflict over leadership” within the movement, and “brought ideological disagreements into open controversy.” Nevertheless, the Grimké sisters’ revolutionary beliefs regarding racial and gender equality directly challenged America’s prevailing social system, and ignited a nationwide debate regarding the religious, political, economic, and social rights of African Americans and women. Consequently, the Grimké sisters are irrefutably deserving of acknowledgement and adulation as early forerunners of the African American Civil Rights
Angelina was also permanently barred from Charleston and threatened with mob violence, arrest, and imprisonment if she dared to venture into the city; subsequently, neither Angelina nor Sarah ever visited Charleston again. Although Angelina was exceedingly saddened by the South’s violent reactions to her appeal, and undoubtedly convinced that she had “sacrificed any friend I thought I had,” she concurrently believed that the abolitionist cause was “a cause worth dying for.” Additionally, the Philadelphia Society of Friends responded to the appeal by permanently disowning the Grimké sisters for publicly propagating their radical and dangerous anti-slavery philosophies. However, the “Appeal to the Christian Women of the Southern States” was enthusiastically received throughout the North, and rapidly published in numerous antislavery papers and reform journals. Furthermore, numerous, radical abolition groups vigorously praised Angelina Grimké for her fearless courage, and zealously labeled her as a crusader for African Americans and …show more content…
However, their roles as female leaders within the abolitionist movement were considered highly controversial and ultimately “obscured the remarkable accomplishments of their mission.” Additionally, the Grimké sisters’ outspoken critiques of racial and gender inequality alienated them from various religious organizations and conservative abolitionist groups, and deprived them of crucial support in the North. Furthermore, there were numerous abolitionists who blamed Sarah and Angelina Grimké for the eventual split in the abolitionist movement because “their actions heightened conflict over leadership” within the movement, and “brought ideological disagreements into open controversy.” Nevertheless, the Grimké sisters’ revolutionary beliefs regarding racial and gender equality directly challenged America’s prevailing social system, and ignited a nationwide debate regarding the religious, political, economic, and social rights of African Americans and women. Consequently, the Grimké sisters are irrefutably deserving of acknowledgement and adulation as early forerunners of the African American Civil Rights