Analysis Of Andrew Jackson's Policy Of Indian Removal

Improved Essays
Andrew Jackson’s policy of Indian Removal was not justified because Georgia made the Cherokees follow unfair laws and the soldiers disrespected all the Cherokees. One example from the text is, “White men in uniforms ride up to our home… My mother tells me to gather my things but the men don't allow us to get anything. They enter our home beginning to knock down pottery and looking into everything.” (Samuel Cloud Memory) Based on this information, I realized that the Americans didn't really care for the Indians. They just wanted them out of the territory the Americans wanted even though the Supreme Court said the Indians land was off limits. “ You want the Cherokees to live according to the laws of Georgia, no matter how unfair they are?” (

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    How did the American government shift from an “expansion with honor” policy to a policy of the expulsion of the Cherokee people? The Cherokee people were once a great nation whose population spanned all across the South Eastern corners of the North American continent. The Cherokee people once called states such as North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, Tennessee, Alabama, Kentucky, and Virginia home. The Cherokee people once governed their own nation, a nation where men hunted and women farmed. A nation where both men and women worked together in harmony as a balance for each other, an equilibrium.…

    • 1495 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Indian Removal Act In 1828 Andrew Jackson had own presidency and had succeed by changing things with the government. One of many was him having a special relationship with the common people. He removed about 10 percent of workers and replaced with loyal friends and followers. In the 1800’s Native Americans had been living next to white neighbors, taking on their culture.…

    • 435 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Indian Removal Act Dbq

    • 1275 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Sacred land was illegally and unconstitutionally being taken from the Cherokee. Lastly, the government had basically tricked the Indians into giving away their land, and made promises they didn’t keep. The first reason why the Indian Removal Act was not justified was because innocent Indians were forced to go on this treacherous journey while not getting enough food, water, and shelter. They started migrating towards present day Oklahoma during the winter of 1838.…

    • 1275 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He shall go his face no show Should Andrew Jackson be removed off of the 20 dollar bill? I believe Andrew Jackson should be removed off of the 20 dollar because he was cruel towards the American Indians and He only supported the white males. He also supported the Indian removal act and He acted like a king. Although he did some positive things such as creating the spoils system, and contributing to the democracy by allowing more people to vote. Andrew Jackson doesn’t deserve to represent us as americans.…

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When the Georgians invaded their land for the gold within it the Cherokees decided to go to court. During the trial the judge decided that the Cherokees land was for the Cherokees and separate from the United States, but the Cherokees were still invaded in the end. Jackson decided to ignore the invaders not enforcing the verdict saying the judge should be enforcing it. He also ordered the Cherokees removal leading to the violent march, The Trail of Tears, which resulted in the deaths of around 4,000 Cherokees. This travesty is another reason why Jackson is a villain not a…

    • 563 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This action caused the Indians to suffer, and many of them died along the way. Jackson’s message to congress regarding the Indian removal explained that many Indian tribes were becoming extinct and asked congress to consider setting aside territory west of the Mississippi specially for the Indians (Doc. J). This proposal was used to solely benefit the eastern territory to benefit farmers and working men by opening up lands. Jackson benefitted himself economically at a cost, which was removing the Indians from the territory without their consent, proving his egotistical behavior. Correspondingly, responses from the Cherokee tribe verified Jackson’s injustice.…

    • 1166 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nullification Crisis Dbq

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages

    1832 // Nullification Crisis Thomas Jefferson introduced us to the idea of nullification during the whole debacle with the Alien and Sedition acts and the Virginia and Kentucky Resolutions. The issue was reintroduced in 1828 with the enforcement of the Tariff of 1828, also dubbed the “Tariff of Abomination.” This tariff was a payment put on other nations’ imports. Sounding innocent, it was meant to protect the North’s growing industrial impact, reserving it the most room to prosper. It tended to be more taxing (bad dum tiss!) on the South, deterring trade with potential businesses John C. Calhoun, senator from South Carolina, argued the his state had the right to nullify this tariff.…

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Cherokee Nation and the Trail of Tears During the spring semester of 2016, I was given the opportunity to read a very insightful book called, The Cherokee Nation and the Trail of Tears, by Theda Purdue and Micheal D. Green. The book covers the events leading up to, during, and directly after the Trail of Tears. The Trail of Tears was the mass migration of Native Americans from their motherland in the eastern shores of the United States, to the territories of the southwestern United States. Throughout the early 19th Century, there were many conflicts between the government and Native Americans; although none were more racially and economically motivated than that of the state of Georgia and it’s citizens. “We believe the present plan…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    "It will be my sincere and constant desire to observe toward the Indian tribes within our limits a just and liberal policy”... (Doc 2) Jackson was open minded about the Indian tribes. This allowed him to have a future friendship, or in a sense, loyalty towards each other. This loyalty was carried on for some time and then Jackson authorized all Native Americans to be removed from the Southeast states of Georgia, Mississippi, & Alabama and moved west of the Mississippi River after gold was found on Cherokee land in Georgia. Some of the major tribes that were affected were the Cherokee, Choctaw, Chickasaw, and Creek tribes.…

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Andrew Jackson did what he thought was best for America when it came to Indian removal. Jackson decision to remove the Indians allowed for the newly acquired land to become “the basis for the cotton kingdom”(As long as Grass Grows or Water Runs, p107). If it wasn’t for Jackson we may not have such a rich country because cotton heavily strengthened our economy and promoted trade.…

    • 164 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The process of removal of the Cherokees was not a fair removal, because the Americans were taking away their control of the land which left the Cherokees to stand up…

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During his presidency, Jackson supported The Indian Removal Act. The Act forced the Indians to move west of the Mississippi. The Indians believed they should not be removed from their home land, and the Cherokee sued the government. The Cherokee have won in court, and earned the right to stay at their homeland. This isn’t the case to Jackson; he still forced the Indians out to the west.…

    • 918 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    He commented "It gives me pleasure to announce to Congress that the benevolent policy of the Government, steadily pursued for nearly thirty years, in relation to the removal of the Indians beyond the white settlements is approaching to a happy consummation” (Library of Congress, Jackson, 1830). At that time however only two tribes agreed to leave their land, the others were not in agreement with the Indian Removal Act. In response, the American Indians fought back on a political level, Chief John Ross who represented the majority of the American Indians who did not want to leave their lands tried to diplomatically and legally maintain autonomy with the United States…

    • 1122 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Jackson uprooted seventy thousand Indians from their homes and drove them west of the Mississippi River. He was clearing the way for the rise of the Cotton Kingdom”(Tamaki 82). This showed how disrespected the native American’s were from the society. The native American’s had no choice to stay they would have been attacked by the American…

    • 1207 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The indian removal act of 1830 was justified and the cherokees should've moved because they had done horrible things to people, better land, and freedom. The first reason, the cherokees should’ve moved is because they have done horrible…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays