Indeed, at the beginning of the second paragraph it is written « Wilson’s arrival on the Wellfleet beach regularly caused a stir » (l9), which shows that he did not go unnoticed. However, it is hard to say if it is a good impression or not because opinions are divided. We are told about « a distinct mental avidity and nervous unrest » (l10), this agitation is probably caused by the fact that he is really outstanding, and everybody wants to see this « phenomenon ». Besides, the narrator expressed that he has an « immense authority for everyone » (l18) which shows that everybody respects him, whether he likes him or not. To go deeper, it is especially the literary professors who think a lot of him and who even talk about him to their classes, as if he was a sort of example. Furthermore, he is at once a source of amusement, astonishment and intimidation ; the paronomasia « it amused and amazed » (l26) reinforces the fact that he did not go unnoticed. Thus, Edmund Wilson is a center of interest and I will even say that in some way he is a « circus freak », and the end of the passage under study is relevant to show it. Indeed in the last paragraph we are told that he is « at the center of everyone’s attention, sometimes forced against his will into the usual gossip and polemic ». It is the bad side of his « fame », even when he wants to be alone walking and looking at nature he cannot. The last element I will talk about in the second part is the opinion of the narrator about Edmund Wilson : it is obvious that he is not neutral. He shows his opinion using « I », as at line 14 : « brought out in me… » and he depicts him as someone disdainful with a lonely proud face ; he uses some demonstrative pronouns like « that »to make the reader know his own opinion about Wilson. To sum up, I think that the opinion people have about Wilson helps the reader
Indeed, at the beginning of the second paragraph it is written « Wilson’s arrival on the Wellfleet beach regularly caused a stir » (l9), which shows that he did not go unnoticed. However, it is hard to say if it is a good impression or not because opinions are divided. We are told about « a distinct mental avidity and nervous unrest » (l10), this agitation is probably caused by the fact that he is really outstanding, and everybody wants to see this « phenomenon ». Besides, the narrator expressed that he has an « immense authority for everyone » (l18) which shows that everybody respects him, whether he likes him or not. To go deeper, it is especially the literary professors who think a lot of him and who even talk about him to their classes, as if he was a sort of example. Furthermore, he is at once a source of amusement, astonishment and intimidation ; the paronomasia « it amused and amazed » (l26) reinforces the fact that he did not go unnoticed. Thus, Edmund Wilson is a center of interest and I will even say that in some way he is a « circus freak », and the end of the passage under study is relevant to show it. Indeed in the last paragraph we are told that he is « at the center of everyone’s attention, sometimes forced against his will into the usual gossip and polemic ». It is the bad side of his « fame », even when he wants to be alone walking and looking at nature he cannot. The last element I will talk about in the second part is the opinion of the narrator about Edmund Wilson : it is obvious that he is not neutral. He shows his opinion using « I », as at line 14 : « brought out in me… » and he depicts him as someone disdainful with a lonely proud face ; he uses some demonstrative pronouns like « that »to make the reader know his own opinion about Wilson. To sum up, I think that the opinion people have about Wilson helps the reader