Analysis Of Alexis De Tocqueville's Democracy In America

Superior Essays
Alexis De Tocqueville was a French aristocrat, who wrote the book “Democracy in America”. This was Tocqueville’s extensive research on America’s Democracy in 1835. Tocqueville explained the positive and negatives about America’s democracy. One point he made was how democracy is “free and natural” (Tocqueville 143). Democracy gives people the voice to choose who they want to lead their country, local, or state government. A negative aspect of America’s democracy is the difference in the three social classes (Tocqueville 144). The first class is the rich, the second is middle working class, and the third is the poor. The lower class is looked at differently and the first class is envied. Tocqueville makes crucial points about how Democracy works …show more content…
They are all white, rich, and have had good education. Tocqueville states these type of men are usually the ones to lead our country. Black men or women would never lead our country at this time period because they were not looked at the same and were held to a lower standard. Neither blacks nor women had rights or freedom. Even with the three socio economic classes, there was an obvious divide. Tocqueville states, “the lower social classes seem to be less likely to confuse their personal interests with this support than the upper class” (Tocqueville 144). People do not hate the upper class, but at the same time, do not feel much good will for them. The lower classes are not fond of the upper class, and it is obvious. Even with the election, sometimes the candidates does not have the lower classes favor, which causes them to lose the …show more content…
It has its advantages and disadvantages. One advantage is the citizens have a voice. They get to choose who they believe is the right person to lead their country. But sometimes a candidates will say everything the people want to hear, and not actually do it. It can really affect a nation, and make the people angry. A disadvantage is the difference in socio economic classes and how they feel towards each other. The upper class is envied by the lower class. They do not look at the upper class with any remorse because they have money and live comfortable. The lower class does not always want someone from the upper class to lead their country because they do not have the same problems as the lower and do not always think the same way. Regardless, Tocqueville points are still legitimate to this day and still explain democracy

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    DBQ - Democracy in Colonial America Essay The thirteen colonies wanted to start a democracy because they were so far away from Great Britain. Democratic and undemocratic features in colonial America was a work in progress for democracy. One democratic feature is accountability. Accountability is when elected officials are accountable for their actions.…

    • 243 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    DBQ - Democracy in Colonial America Essay Democracy in colonial America is a work in progress due to democratic and undemocratic features. Because England (the mother country) was so far away. This has made it incredibly difficult to be democratic. If they were in England it would be easier to be a democratic state.…

    • 258 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Alexis de Tocqueville’s Democracy in America and various selections in Ralph Waldo Emerson’s Antislavery Writings (specifically, his “Address on the Emancipation of the Negroes in the British West Indies,” “The Fugitive Slave Law,” “The President’s Proclamation,” his “Lecture on Slavery,” and lastly his “Address to the Citizens of Concord on the Fugitive Slave Law”) discuss the deleterious effects of conformity on the American mind, and on society as a whole. Both authors discuss the relationship between majority tyranny and slavery in the United States. Upon analyzing Alexis de Tocqueville’s Democracy in America and Ralph Waldo Emerson’s Antislavery Writings, it is clear that the authors agree on the effects of majority tyranny and slavery…

    • 1275 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    James Madison and Alexis de Tocqueville are both giants in American political theory and both have deliberated extensively on the tyranny of the majority in democratic societies. Since both are from different eras, the way each of them talk about the problem is framed in different terms and different contexts. Madison offers a solution to a perceived problem, and Tocqueville observes and critiques the solution. In the many Federalist Papers Madison published on the issue, there is one solution that is most conductive to reducing the powers of the tyranny of the majority, and this is solution is the checks and balances between the separate branches of government and between the federal and state governments. Tocqueville’s assessment of this attempted restraint is poor, he sees the government as becoming increasingly centralized in power and state and local governments losing their prestige and influence.…

    • 1232 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is quite clear as we analyze Andrew Jackson’s presidency that he had the ambition to establish greater democracy for the common man of the United States. This political movement was dubbed, “Jacksonian Democracy”. Jackson had gone through with the movement by expanding suffrage amongst common men, establishing the spoils system, and “killing” the National Bank. He was admired by the common man, as he rose from rags to riches, was a patriot, and gained renown and fame from the War of 1812, much like Washington from the American Revolution.…

    • 603 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Paper #3 – Critical Evaluation of Hudson’s Challenges to American Democracy In the textbook, American Democracy in Peril, William E. Hudson has written a well-thought out critique of the challenges faced by American democracy, but some of his methods and reasonings have issues. Hudson is looking for anything that he thinks might work in the American democracy. This paper will critically evaluate Hudson’s work and a few specific flaws in his proposals. Hudson is striving to make a difference, but he has not conscientiously considered the feasibility of his plans.…

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Neither Tocqueville nor the authors of the Federalist Papers view an enlightened and virtuous citizenry as wholly essential to the Constitutional system, but while the federalists build institutions to defend the government against the self-interested passions of the people, Tocqueville sees the greatest benefits of the American political system where the government and the people meet: in the township and in political associations. The Federalists believe that the core of the Constitution system’s success lies in its institutions rather than the people. Their writings repeatedly show doubt in the abilities of the public to govern, construct institutions to defend against their involvement, limiting their civic duties to elections. Tocqueville,…

    • 1325 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Role of the Citizen in a Constitutional Democracy Despite major conflicts and social changes, the American Constitution has offered a framework of governance for over two hundred years. The Framers of the American constitution sought to create a government free of tyrannical rule—where power derives from the consent of the governed. The US constitution outlines a form of national government that aims to serve the American people by protecting their rights and liberties. The US constitution is succinct and difficult to amend; congress has only passed twenty-seven amendments since the ratification of the constitution. In this essay, I will analyze the arguments Robert Dahl’s presents in his book “How Democratic is the American Constitution”…

    • 1116 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Is America Truly a Democracy? In the light of reading the passage from The Shame of the cities published in 1904, it has raised the question is America truly a democracy. Throughout history, it has seemed there has always been some sort of polluting in the voting polls. Voting is a promise of equality while at the same time, it is a great threat to the men who created our government.…

    • 792 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Based on Aristotle’s definitions of Oligarchy and Democracy, can America be considered a true democracy? Aristotle points out several forms of government throughout his “Democracy and Oligarchy”. In this work, Aristotle focuses primarily on democracy and oligarchy and makes a strong effort through the use of definitions to distinguish between the many instances these two forms of government are able to exist in and the differences between the them. Using Aristotle’s definitions, let us diagnose America and see if she can rightfully claim democracy, first by explaining what the two types of government consist of and then by picking through a few characteristics of America. “Democracy is the form of government in which the free are rulers”…

    • 774 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Vega 1 Breanna Vega Professor Olmos English 101 23 April 2016 Citizens Rule Democracy is known to be a strong form of government, because it gives full power to the people of the nation. Many argue about how a democracy works, but do not understand it includes difficult tasks for it to be successful. In Cornel West’s reading, “The Deep Democratic Tradition in America,” the idea of a strong democracy is by the people, but the promise of a democracy has failed. In order to keep the promise of strong democracy individual practices such as voting rights, the principle of protection, and the representation of each individual must be practiced under no circumstances.…

    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They would strive for happiness for themselves, and for the democracy as a whole. Tocqueville thought for a successful democracy, citizens must keep the greater good in line with their own interest. They would keep in mind of their actions, if they would be beneficial to themselves as an individual, and to society as a whole. Mill and Tocqueville both agreed with the notion of individualism, and allowing individuals to think, and to form opinions, and to carry out their opinions without hindrance from anyone.…

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Kevin L. Doolie writes about Alexis De Tocqueville and his political theories and says that De Tocqueville was right in thinking that early American colonies heavily influenced the rest of America. The religious thought and belief for a ruling authority connected them to realize that they needed a government to have…

    • 1565 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    It is important to note the definition of equality in Tocqueville's time is different from equality today. During this time, primo geniture came to an end. This meant there was no longer any family bloodline in land ownership. Land ownership was longer the defining characteristic between social classes. Now, there was more mobility to move in between social classes.…

    • 1038 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Education and Democracy are entangled in American history and thought. Each one shapes the other. Plato mentions the cycle of cities and soul. The best city is the aristocracy, followed by a timocracy, oligarchy, democracy, and tyranny. The type of souls to be found in the city are a philosopher, timocract, oligarchy, democrat, and a tyrant, respectively.…

    • 1276 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays