In Joel Barlow’s “Advice to a Raven in Russia”, he makes several points that hint toward his anti-Napoleon agenda. He makes references to the lands Napoleon has ravaged along his path of destruction. Barlow uses a raven as a sort of mascot because a raven can fly over everything and not only see the damage that has been done to the land, but also the people that inhabited these lands.
This poem was written in 1812, which was during the time of the ruthless leader of France, Napoleon Bonaparte. Napoleon was a short man with a short fuse that wanted all the land and power he could obtain. He seized power of France in 1799. He ruled as a dictator and there were only 4 years of peace before the Napoleonic …show more content…
Barlow was sent to Russia on behalf of President James Madison. His mission was to persuade Napoleon to sign a treaty of peace with the United States. When Barlow arrived in Russia, not only was he unable to meet with Napoleon, he was able to witness the brutality of the war front. Napoleon was known for destroying the land he was battling through. Barlow described it as the “catastrophic carnage of the war”, which was when he decided to write Advice to a Raven in Russia. Barlow begins the poem “Black fool, why winter here?”, this is so the reader can slowly start realizing that this poem is about a raven (Hill). Throughout the poem he throws subtle hits and jabs at Napoleon and the destruction he caused. This raven is foolishly flying over the lands that Napoleon has already taken over and/or destroyed. Barlow’s advice to the raven was to turn around and head to Spain or India to get away from its “master”. He then goes on to make several points about how far a raven can fly, and how it could not reach the distance it would need to cover the continent like it would need to so it can see the full carnage that Napoleon has caused. Barlow says, “The triple BAN, that like the hound of hell Gripes with three joles, to hold his victim well.” When Barlow says “ban”, he is talking about three different kinds of people on the war front. The first ban, according to the French, was the “younger and more effective” part of the population that could serve in the militia or national guard. The second ban is younger than the first, and the third ban is even more immature and unready than the first and second ban’s. Barlow references “the hound of hell”, which could be a metaphor for Cerberus. This could be a reference to the monster of French militarism and how all three levels of the “ban”, are used to feed it. The battles that the “ban” fought, led to many deaths of these young people. Barlow used clear imagery