Abraham Lincoln: The Road To Martyrdom Analysis

Improved Essays
Lincoln: The Road to Martyrdom

“The imperfect nature of human beings meant that actions motivated by ignorance, greed and selfishness could produce setbacks or detours in the achievement of divine intention”. Indeed slavery does produce setbacks in the progress of divine intention, but one single man would change this in our course of history that man is Abraham Lincoln. Although not every man would’ve supported his actions he would still become a martyr in American history for abolishing slavery. He was the only man that had the power to end slavery and the emancipation proclamation would give him the power to abolish slavery, however not without a fight. Everyone today knows that Abraham Lincoln was a man who opposed slavery his whole
…show more content…
His rival Stephen A. Douglas also had some strong view points on slavery however they were very different from that of Lincoln. Although Lincoln appears to be the more solemn of the two seeing how he is portrayed in sculpture and busts, it was actually Stephen A. Douglas who was the more reserved man when it came to talking about and debating slavery, not the brazen Abraham Lincoln who is more outspoken and rebellious than he really seems. While Abraham Lincoln believed that a house divided against itself could not stand (he was referring to opponents and advocates of slavery in this quote), Douglas believed that house divided COULD stand as it was, divided into free and slave states that is however this does not mean that Douglas was for slavery. If anything Lincoln’s greatest rival actually had a neutral attitude towards the delicate topic known as slavery. Unfortunately for Stephen his decision to be neutral towards slavery and not really be one sided on slavery meaning either support the south or the north, is what ultimately caused him to lose the presidential election of 1860. Lincoln’s one sided viewpoint and power to move the northerners earned him the win for this historic

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Lincoln was opposed to racial equality. He said a strong response in the fifth paragraph to Senator Stephen Douglas, Lincoln stated “I have no purpose to introduce political and social equality between the white and black races. There is a physical difference between the two, which, in my judgement, will probably forever forbid their living together upon the footing of perfect equality” (11). This statement really gives you an idea on what Lincoln thinks about the issue, racial equality. Lincoln strongly defended slaveowners, and their right to own their property.…

    • 1685 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Stephen Douglas: Abolitionist, Proslaveryite, or both? Francesca Scola Stephen Douglas's purposeful political ambiguity and avid pursuit of self-aggrandisement demonstrated through his stance on the Kansas-Nebraska Act, Lecompton Constitution, and Freeport Doctrine, ultimately cost him the 1860 election. Through his stance on the Kansas-Nebraska Act, Lecompton Constitution, and Freeport Doctrine, Stephen Douglas’s purposeful ambiguity and avid pursuit of self-aggrandisement ultimately cost him the 1860 election.…

    • 955 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I believe Lincoln deserves to be one of our most beloved presidents. He accomplished many things in his life. He achieved many great things. Many of his accomplishments inspired people to start achieving their own. He changed the nation with his presidency.…

    • 214 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Lincoln had a " bold and unchanging opposition to slavery" (Stone 5) that drove him to try and ahieve ending it in America. Eventually he did but it took alot of time and even after many people in the nation still didn't agree with what he had done. He had to then deal with the Civil War between the north and south. Soon after he "made an the end of slavery permanent" (Stone 7).…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Although Lincoln was personally against slavery, he never said he wanted to end slavery in the South because he knew that having southern states’ support would be more beneficial to his candidacy. With Lincoln being a republican, he couldn’t speak the whole truth about his thoughts on slavery. Lincoln felt that it would be impossible to get the southern states to agree with the abolishment of slavery. Lincoln did not want to interfere with the policies of slaveholding states because he would need their electoral votes to win the presidential election. His platform was trusted by the voters of the Northeast and…

    • 1586 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    In The Radical and the Republican: Frederick Douglass, Abraham Lincoln, and the Triumph of Antislavery Politics, the author, James Oakes, articulates Abraham Lincolns and Frederick Douglass’s attitudes in regard to the issue of abolition and the freedom of slaves. Whilst Frederick Douglass was inactive in politics, he was a radical heavily engaged in the abolition of slavery. On the other hand, Andrew Jackson was a diligent Republican politician who had strong notions towards the enslavement of blacks. Although they came from different backgrounds and had divergent idealistic views, ultimately they joined forces to fight for the implementation of the emancipation and the nullification of slavery.…

    • 1130 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It would be appropriate to say that “By the 1850’s the constitution, originally framed as an instrument of national unity had become a source of sectional discord and tension and ultimately contributed to the failure of the union it had created” is a valid statement. This is because virtually everyone in the nation, the public, statesmen, and presidents, felt growing tensions over the fate of territories, interpretation of the constitution, and the justification behind the southern secession in relativity to the issue of slavery. The issue of slavery became a huge controversial topic in territories once they were ready for admission into the union. This could be exemplified by the disputes over and whether or not the state of California…

    • 1088 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dred Scott was slave who sued for his liberty in the Missouri courts, arguing that four years on free soil had made him free. He was once owned by army surgeon John Emerson. Dred Scott’s attorney argued that between 1831 and 1833, John Emerson had taken Scott with him during various military postings to areas where the Missouri Compromise banned slavery, making Dred Scott a free man. When nearly after six years in the Missouri courts, the state Supreme Court rejected this argument in 1852, Dred Scott, with the help of abolitionist lawyers, appealed to the United States Supreme Court. In a 7 to 2 decision, the Court ruled against Dred Scott.…

    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Lincoln made and signed emancipation proclamation, but he didn’t do it for all the slaves to be free, he actually did it as a military move, to win the war. It only freed the slaves that have seceded from the union, so there were still states with slaves in them. And he didn’t give the slaves the rights of a white man yet, he just freed them and made them citizens. He just wanted to defeat the south so, he took away their “property”(aka the slaves) so that it would be easier to truly defeat the south, this was also after they won a battle so, it didn’t make Mr. Lincoln look “weak”. He didn’t want to interfere with slavery, he only did it as a military…

    • 504 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This made Lincoln perfect for politics. Although Lincoln did not have much national-office holding background, he did spend a term in the House of Representatives and was involved in a political party, giving Lincoln an advantage over the other candidates. The biggest issues Lincoln supported were anti-slavery, opposition for the Meican-American war, and the working class. “Although he quickly won attention for his speeches on slavery, reflecting the considerable thought he had been putting into the issues”. (page 13).…

    • 1239 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Disagreements in political decisions became a large dividing factor between the North and the South, along with the growing disagreements between the North and the South in ideology. Even from the founding of the country the North and South had been divided. The Nullification crisis was the first event that highlighted the division between the North and South. The nullification crisis was the confrontation between the state of South Carolina and the federal government in 1832–33 over the former's attempt to declare null and void within the state the federal Tariffs of 1828 and 1832. The disagreement on the secession of South Carolina caused further disagreements between the North and South (Document A).…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Abraham Lincoln Dbq

    • 1258 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Lee were some of Lincoln’s opponents. Robert E. Lee was the general of the Confederate army and a strong believer in slavery. Stephen Douglas was a politician who designed the Kansas-Nebraska Act, which allowed states to decide for themselves if they want to remain a state with slavery or become a free state (Historynet). Douglas, while running against Lincoln for senator, also led campaigns against Lincoln saying that Lincoln would “make slaves of white man and free man of black slaves” and that the goal of Lincoln and the Whigs was “to make the negro the equal of the white man” (Blumenthal…

    • 1258 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Dred claiming that only the whites be granted full citizenship of U.S while Lincoln was fighting for freeing slaves. In the political campaigns of Lincoln and Douglas, speeches on the abolition of slavery gave Lincoln an upper hand even though he was young and new in Senate politics. Abraham Lincoln lost narrowly to…

    • 999 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Picture this scene. It’s April 14, 1865 at Ford’s Theatre, around 10:00 o’clock at night. The 16th president, Abraham Lincoln lies unconscious on the floor, blood and brain matter gushing out of his head. Crowds of raging, screaming people trying to force their way into the president’s box fill the theater. The play being performed onstage forgotten immediately, the actors taking part in the angry mob.…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In his essay, Guelzo mentioned how Enlightenment changed the ideology of Lincoln such as “his unquestioning belief in universal natural rights” (Guelzo, 353). Additionally, his background with the “hard-shell” Separate Baptists (Guelzo, 356) and Calvinism made him a determined person to help end slavery. Guelzo quoted the speech that Lincoln gave in 1858: “I hate it because of the monstrous injustice of slavery itself ” (Guelzo, 354). Though it is not stated explicitly, Lincoln made this comment to signify his opposition. Guelzo provided an insight of how time played a huge role in the abolition process.…

    • 1071 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays