In a Utopian World, Everyone Should Have the Same Healthcare
If there is the same healthcare everywhere, knowledge and expertise would be equally divided. Exchanging knowledge with each other turns out to be really effective (Ebbens & Ettekovens, 2014). When everyone has the same healthcare no knowledge will be lost. There will also be more equality within the world population (de Brabander, 2008).
Counterargument
However, the philosopher Erich Fromm argues that the proposed system will lead to automatic conformism. The creative brain will not be stimulated as much because everybody is expected to do the same. In the end this phenomenon ensures complete passivity. In addition, every culture provides their own standards and values. This offers …show more content…
The second of these ten abilities has been formulated as ‘physical health’. This means that people should be able to have good health, with adequate nutrition and housing (Melander, Sävenstedt, Wälivaara & Olsson, 2018).
Conclusion
In summary, this means that when there would be the same healthcare worldwide knowledge and expertise would be equally divided (Ebbens & Ettekovens, 2014). The same quality of care would be delivered all over the world (Duyndam & Poorthuis, 2003). In this way we work for the greater good and it would bring more happiness around the world (Melander, Sävenstedt, Wälivaara & Olsson, 2018). However, at first there will be chaos because a big part of the world population as to change their way of thinking and living to adapt. An another side effect will be automatic conformism. By this phenomenon some unique ways of thinking will perish (Braune, 2014). In conclusion care should be given from the heart and everybody deserves the same kindness. In a utopian world, everybody should receive the same amount of kindness and attention. In a utopian world everyone should have the same healthcare (Melander, Sävenstedt, Wälivaara & Olsson,
If there is the same healthcare everywhere, knowledge and expertise would be equally divided. Exchanging knowledge with each other turns out to be really effective (Ebbens & Ettekovens, 2014). When everyone has the same healthcare no knowledge will be lost. There will also be more equality within the world population (de Brabander, 2008).
Counterargument
However, the philosopher Erich Fromm argues that the proposed system will lead to automatic conformism. The creative brain will not be stimulated as much because everybody is expected to do the same. In the end this phenomenon ensures complete passivity. In addition, every culture provides their own standards and values. This offers …show more content…
The second of these ten abilities has been formulated as ‘physical health’. This means that people should be able to have good health, with adequate nutrition and housing (Melander, Sävenstedt, Wälivaara & Olsson, 2018).
Conclusion
In summary, this means that when there would be the same healthcare worldwide knowledge and expertise would be equally divided (Ebbens & Ettekovens, 2014). The same quality of care would be delivered all over the world (Duyndam & Poorthuis, 2003). In this way we work for the greater good and it would bring more happiness around the world (Melander, Sävenstedt, Wälivaara & Olsson, 2018). However, at first there will be chaos because a big part of the world population as to change their way of thinking and living to adapt. An another side effect will be automatic conformism. By this phenomenon some unique ways of thinking will perish (Braune, 2014). In conclusion care should be given from the heart and everybody deserves the same kindness. In a utopian world, everybody should receive the same amount of kindness and attention. In a utopian world everyone should have the same healthcare (Melander, Sävenstedt, Wälivaara & Olsson,