12 Angry Man Analysis

Improved Essays
Twelve Angry Man

· “Life is in their hands,Death is on their minds。”These worlds from Twelve Angry Man. This text talked about there have twelve members of the jury are discussed in a rest room to decide whether a murder case was established. The murder defendant is a 18 year old child, his father is dead. Twelve members of a jury must discuss a consensus: the children's murder of a crime. If established, the child will be sent to the chair the execution of the death penalty. If not established, then the reason not established on the trial must be based on reasoning, inquiry, evidence, testimony or program "reasonable doubt". The witness, evidence is complete, beginning in twelve people eleven people cut nail iron cutting that children feel
…show more content…
Somebody’s in left field. (To EIGHT) You think he’s not guilty?
EIGHT (quietly). I don’t know.
On that time only one juror convent boys innocent . After five times demonstration,six times 9: 3,juror nine and twelve to join. We can see the progress of the text and the each juror’s psychological changes from only one juror convent the boy is not guilty to nine juror believe boy’s innocent is not happened in one time , but there is continuity cause by Juror’s worlds and evidence showing not complete more and more juror vote not guilty . This article’s the details are treated very well by the author,because this article is about a father may killed by his son there have some evidence and witness but there lost of direct evidence. For example,Juror nine, we know he is a old man,by the juror eight sense of responsibility sense of justice encouraged to stand out, a key figure in the plot twists for two slum born witness of psychological distress has wonderful nuanced analysis ,the reason he didn’t vote not guilty at the first because his old and wouldn’t like to argument with other people and he leg doesn’t good. Author uses details description well and this is very important when you are writing an arctic
…show more content…
The twelve man sitting in an single room they argument ,at the first only one juror believe boy didn’t murder his father until all twelve juror believe the boys innocent. We can realize the respect and reverence for life and truth,and when a person's life in your hands when you are willing to think independently , even do a little bit of doubt? All plot setting in an single its limits on writing but author use technique make up “a room” limitation . The witter make us to remember twelve juror by their words , and control plot development finally have well detailed description of details. That’s why reader can read these such good

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Pathos In Juror 8

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Juror 8 is the only juror to have original reasonable doubt, so he faces a difficult…

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    12 Angry Men is a compelling and profound film produced in 1957 directed by Sidney Lumet. This film set in a single room with just twelve cast member, these twelve play a jury called together to judge a murder case involving a young boy who is accused of murdering his father. The jury is charged with coming to a unanimous decision because the punishment is death penalty. Throughout the movie the cast is never referred to by name, rather by their jury numbers offering the viewer an air of mystery and intrigue. The film further shows its artistic talent by offering not only a story to challenge the mind but also the audience’s ethical beliefs.…

    • 1109 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Questions On 12 Angry Men

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Not ready to accept change or reality at the first go. He was last one to accept not guilty. Jury 8: He has courage to go against the 11 jury members to stand in what he believe. He was compassionate and curious standing against all the odds and engaging the group courageously. He created a constructive dissonance that lead to extracting some finer details.…

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    12 Angry Men Movie Clip (Architect) From the beginning, the Architect was the only person who believed that there was reasonable doubt, which cause him to stand along. He stated and consistently repeated throughout several scenes that he didn’t know whether or not the boy’s story is true or not which led him to be t he only person to vote not guilty. After a series of several voting attempts, the Architect continued to challenge the jurors locked in thinking which stimulated other to think outside the box and new question emerged. Slowly, other juror members begin to change their mind and vote not guilty as well.…

    • 1384 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He’s calm, knows how to argue while still maintaining his cool, and has a strong sense of morality that does not waiver. He is also the only completely static character. While the other eleven jurors decide the defendant is guilty with nothing more than a brief glance at the case, juror eight says, “It’s not so easy for me to raise my hand and send a boy off to die without talking about it first. ”(12 Angry Men). This is only one of the many examples of juror eight’s compassion for his fellow man and investment to the case.…

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Their choice would either send an 18-year-old Hispanic man to death or set him free. When the twelve men were locked in the deliberation room, the jury foreman acted as the facilitator for the group. It was the jury foreman that got everyone focused for the initial vote. It was important get everyone focused because the group was busy discussing their personal life, occupations, and their future plans. They were not discussing the case because they assumed everyone would vote the same.…

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This statement by juror nine gives the viewers an understanding on how good juror eight appealed to the emotions of the others. He did not say that the boy wasn’t guilty; he provided evidence, and showed the others that there are possibilities that the boy did not kill his father. The discussion continues as they bring up the testimony of the witnesses of the murder. Juror eight appeals to the emotions of the jurors once again;…

    • 1678 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Set in New York, 12 Angry Men follows twelve jurors as they decide whether or not a young 18-year-old Hispanic boy is guilty for stabbing his father in the chest. In a rather small room, the jurors must reach a unanimous decision, and if there is ‘reasonable doubt,’ the young boy will be freed. In one of the initial scenes, a vote is facilitated where 11 jurors find him guilty, and one juror, juror 8 votes that he is not guilty. He expresses to the group that a discussion needs to be made prior to sending a young boy to the death penalty. There is a lack of evidence which supports why the young 18-year-old boy stabbed his father and in turn leaves some of the minds of the jurors in a place where they are unable to convict within moral certainty.…

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The combining effect of these two incidents, gives off the illusion is that the group is all unanimous in the guilty vote. This symptom of group for group think also facilitate the reason behind the normative influence and informative influence that occurred during the voting, by claiming the group is in unanimous agreement, the jurors now think that if everyone agree then I should agree too because they either know something I don’t or I don’t want to be the only odd one out. By definition, conformity happens when we are placed in ambiguous or confusing situations, crisis situations or when other people are experts. During the first voting all but one of the 12 jurors voted not guilty.…

    • 884 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The movie "12 angry Men" is about a jury who has the responsibility to decide whether a teenage is guilty of premeditate murder. At the beginning of the movie, the Judge speaks out to the jury saying that they must come out with a unanimous decision and that the jury has a "grave responsibility" because if found guilty, the boy will be condemn to electric chair. During the jury deliberation, we can identify and address the six steps of the group problem solving process and leadership. This process is really important because coming out with the solution like this one requires a very detail and cautious process.…

    • 810 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    12 Angry Men Thesis

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages

    What if you were on trial for first degree murder? In the movie 12 Angry Men by Reginald Rose, a young eighteen year old male was on trial for supposedly murdering his own father. The twelve men on the jury were faced with different opinions and facts that questioned their morals and values in life. I feel as if this movie did have “worth” in my life. I think the movie had worth because no one should ever be stereotyped, judged, and accused based on what other people say.…

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As the deliberation began to run its course juror #8 begins to slowly show on many occasions that what the prosecution presented could be false. Juror #8 even went to the extent of reenacting some of the witness testimony to demonstrate to his fellow jurors that there is doubt in what was presented. I feel that a jury in today’s society would still have reached a guilty verdict if this case was presented to them because labeling is still exercised in today’s society.…

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    At the start of the deliberation, the jurors each vote upon their verdict to see where the others stand. The first vote is by hands which creates a similar situation tested in the Asch conformity experiments. In the experiment, people are placed in a fake pool of test-takers and are asked to identify which line correctly matches the one provided. All of the other members of the pool have been asked to give the same incorrect answer to see what the subject does. Since there was a vote by hand in deliberation, most people would have seen the majority running toward guilty and picked guilty as well.…

    • 409 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Groupthink In 12 Angry Men

    • 1168 Words
    • 5 Pages

    A juror states that "Kids that live in the slums are all criminals" (12 Angry Men, 1957). Another example of groupthink during the movie is when the jury talk about how the boy's father beat him and would smack him around. The jury say "This boy has been hit so many times that violence is a sort of affair to him" and also one of the jurors says "I would beat him up too if he was my kid" (12 Angry Men, 1975). Throughout the movie groupthink decreased but that was after several hours of deliberation which is when the theory of dialogue comes in to…

    • 1168 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The film also explores the wanton destruction of life that the jury room presents, as well as how easy it is to accuse someone erroneously. Thus,12 Angry Men critiques the legal system by exposing the shortcomings of the jurors themselves. During the course of the film, 12 Angry Men presents the common use of stereotyping and racism. Having a jury of 12 white, middle aged men meant that a broader…

    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays