12 Angry Man Analysis

Improved Essays
Twelve Angry Man

· “Life is in their hands,Death is on their minds。”These worlds from Twelve Angry Man. This text talked about there have twelve members of the jury are discussed in a rest room to decide whether a murder case was established. The murder defendant is a 18 year old child, his father is dead. Twelve members of a jury must discuss a consensus: the children's murder of a crime. If established, the child will be sent to the chair the execution of the death penalty. If not established, then the reason not established on the trial must be based on reasoning, inquiry, evidence, testimony or program "reasonable doubt". The witness, evidence is complete, beginning in twelve people eleven people cut nail iron cutting that children feel
…show more content…
Somebody’s in left field. (To EIGHT) You think he’s not guilty?
EIGHT (quietly). I don’t know.
On that time only one juror convent boys innocent . After five times demonstration,six times 9: 3,juror nine and twelve to join. We can see the progress of the text and the each juror’s psychological changes from only one juror convent the boy is not guilty to nine juror believe boy’s innocent is not happened in one time , but there is continuity cause by Juror’s worlds and evidence showing not complete more and more juror vote not guilty . This article’s the details are treated very well by the author,because this article is about a father may killed by his son there have some evidence and witness but there lost of direct evidence. For example,Juror nine, we know he is a old man,by the juror eight sense of responsibility sense of justice encouraged to stand out, a key figure in the plot twists for two slum born witness of psychological distress has wonderful nuanced analysis ,the reason he didn’t vote not guilty at the first because his old and wouldn’t like to argument with other people and he leg doesn’t good. Author uses details description well and this is very important when you are writing an arctic
…show more content…
The twelve man sitting in an single room they argument ,at the first only one juror believe boy didn’t murder his father until all twelve juror believe the boys innocent. We can realize the respect and reverence for life and truth,and when a person's life in your hands when you are willing to think independently , even do a little bit of doubt? All plot setting in an single its limits on writing but author use technique make up “a room” limitation . The witter make us to remember twelve juror by their words , and control plot development finally have well detailed description of details. That’s why reader can read these such good

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    There is a reasonable doubt in my mind.” (Rose 62) Juror #8 was able to argue using the facts to persuade his fellow jurors to see the boy as innocent so that they did not send an innocent man to his death. Our judicial system worked in this play and we received a fair verdict for the boy that was charged. However, The Crucible ended differently, eventually leading John Proctor to say, “ You have made your magic now, for now, I do think I see some shred of goodness in John Proctor. Not enough to wave a banner with, but white enough to keep it from such dogs.” (Miller 144) Proctor is saying here that by keeping silent and not admitting to a crime he didn’t commit it makes him a better person, he has kept his soul and not sold it to save his himself. He will not be persuaded to abandon who he is but stand by the fact that he knows he is innocent and the people who are sending him to be hung are the real witches.…

    • 1680 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    After many votes of most of the jurors are guilty, juror eight explains why he voted not guilty. After that, the other jurors start thinking that juror eight isn’t completely deranged and is being very logical in this situation. When the vote is six to six it seemed as that juror twelve started to think that everyone is going not guilty so he should as well. Juror twelve never officially established reasonable doubt, instead just followed the band wagon. For the final vote when the jurors came to the conclusion that the boy is innocent, I think that juror twelve was happy he voted not guilty and did the right thing but he was happier that he got out of the hot room and can go back to…

    • 1302 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Questions On 12 Angry Men

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages

    He created a constructive dissonance that lead to extracting some finer details. Jury 9: He is an old man and experienced. He observes and interprets in a rational way. He was bold enough to support Jury#8. • Now step back and focus on the systemic level: What clue does their personal history (occupation, nationality, socio-economic status, family circumstances, or educational background) provide about the societal faction each juror…

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It becomes obvious to Scout that Tom is a kind, innocent man and should be found innocent when it is pointed out by Atticus that whoever raped Mayella Ewell was left handed and Tom’s left arm is “a fully twelve inches shorter than his right, and hung dead at his side” (Lee 248), signifying that his left arm is of no use and he could not have committed the crime. The surprise of Tom Robinson being found guilty brings on numerous realizations to Scout such as learning that people won’t always do what is right. It isn’t until she notices her family’s negative reaction that she truly realizes the trial was unjust. Seeing an obviously innocent man be convicted of a crime he did not commit causes Scout to learn how unfair and cruel the world can…

    • 1168 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    12 Angry Men Reflection

    • 1164 Words
    • 5 Pages

    He agreed that after his points, if no one else votes none-guilty that he will agree with a guilty verdict also. So they did a vote, but this vote was different it was a private vote. So the twelve men all casted in their votes. The foramen received the votes and open each on eagerly to see what the vote was. There was one more not-guilty vote.…

    • 1164 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the movie, every juror is convinced that the boy is guilty of the crime; but there is one juror, juror number eight pleads not guilty. He pleaded not guilty because he wanted to discuss the case…

    • 1678 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This case study is over the film 12 Angry Men, revolving around the verdict of a murder case and the 12 jurors charged with making the decision. The jury is comprised of middle aged men or older from various occupations, cultures, and backgrounds. One particular juror is the only member of the jury willing to avoid a snap decision that is pressured by the remaining jurors to get out early. He leads the discussion amongst the other jurors playing devil’s advocate to their guilty verdicts. As the events progress each point brought up in the court hearing is analyzed deeper from multiple angles causing the jurors to accept the challenge of convicting or acquitting the young man on trial with a fair and just verdict.…

    • 1544 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The movie “12 Angry Men” opens to the jury room and fills with twelve juries’ arguments and complain over the murder case. The case was about whether an eighteen year old boy should be found guilty or not guilty about his action. He was accused of killing his father by stabbing him with a knife. The boy’s life is depended on the twelve juries, and those juries are gathered in all different work fields with a little knowledge in criminal justice. The juries began its deliberations; they started to vote and all the jury vote “guilty” except for one, voted “not guilty”.…

    • 1353 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Guilty or not guilty is a life threatening question for an eighteen-year-old boy in the film 12 Angry Men who has been tried for a first-degree murder. The eighteen-year-old boy has been accused of stabbing his own father and the case has been left in the hands of a twelve-man jury in which a guilty verdict mean the automatic death of the boy. Throughout the film, we are able to recognize various communication skills that the twelve individuals display. Leadership There are two types of leaders shown in this film. Since the beginning of the film juror number eight demonstrated to be an emergent leader by not being a follower even though he was the only one who pleaded not guilty and was willing to stand alone against the rest of the jury who pleaded guilty.…

    • 1197 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Every time a member changed his stand due to his logics, was a small win for him. STEP SEVEN- DON’T DECLARE VICTORY TOO EARLY Henry explained every juror with the same effort and didn’t give up till the end. Even though some jurors shouted at him, he was firm. His constant efforts helped him to change the situation of 11-1 in favor of ‘guilty’ to an amazing 12-0 in favor of ‘not guilty’. At the end, juror 9 spotted that one eye witness had nose marks caused by spectacles and most probably women wasn’t wearing them at the time of…

    • 1148 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays