Faith And Imitationation Analysis

Great Essays
Faith, Imitation, and Imagination Faith, what people personally believe, exists independently of whether or not people share with others. It can be confidence in something that is not seen, such as a promise and an engagement; it can be a belief that has not been proven, for example, a religious belief shared by a group of people who work together to provide support for going deeper into their similar faith. In “God, Science, and Imagination”,Wendell Berry indicates that fundamentalists of both religion and science do not adequately understand or respect imagination, which, when properly defined, is a way of knowing as much as science or religion is. Susan Blackmore, the author of “Strange Creatures”, asserts that it is the ability to imitate …show more content…
People naturally tend to imitate others. Take Christians for example. Their imitation ability allows them to get the religious knowledge from their parents, their peers, their teacher and so on, increasing the possibility that they have confidence in the existence of God. Blackmore elaborates a meme, which is everything that is passed from person to person, by analogy with a gene. “Their propagation by jumping from brain to brain, likened them to parasites infecting a host, treated them as physically realized living structures, and showed how mutually assisting memes will gang together in groups just as genes do”(Blackmore, p36). From memes point of view, human brains, where memes are stored, are just physical hosts indispensable for memes to be passed on by imitation. In other words, memes make use of human bodies as their carriers to spread in the crowds, influence human behaviors, and shape the way they think. Based on Blackmore’s theory, the spread of religion or the dissemination of the nonexistence of God can be regarded as the consequences of memes’ desire to be passed on. As a powerful meme, religion is spread by believers who are enthusiastic to share their knowledge with others. Similarly, the idea that God does not exist is a meme as well. Berry criticizes Professor Weinberg, who believe in the nonexistence of God, for using a language that presents belief as knowledge. “As a fundamentalist of science, like the fundamentalists of religion, he is clearly evangelizing, hoping to convert or at least to disturb those who disagree with him”(Berry p21). Like the missionaries, Professor Weinberg grants the authority to his own opinions and try to convert his opponents. As a physicist, he does not use the scientific procedure to prove the nonexistence of the God, but simply writes an article assuming the unknowable things with the absolute confidence. There is no objective evidence on either the existence or the

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Religion Vs. Science

    • 1922 Words
    • 8 Pages

    In religion, “where truths cannot be demonstrated, we accept them as a matter of faith” (Mead 173). When something could not be answered in science, it is left unsolved and not accepted until further attempt. With religion, however, when something can’t be explained, it is accepted by faith even if there is no explanation to prove it. Religion and science both provide something that the other doesn’t. For instance, religion provides us with hope.…

    • 1922 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jonathan Edwards and Thomas Paine both believed in God, but had very extreme views on religion. Edwards became sort of a fanatic, although his intentions were in the right place his writings and sermons were scare tactics to incite the fear of God in his congregation. While Paine on the other hand, believed in God, but believed that God and science were intertwined and had to work together. He believed that there were scientific explanations for what has been taught to Christians for…

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    While the author criticizes about Prof. Weinberg’s opinion, he overlooks the achievements and progression human passed through from scientific discoveries. It is always better to cite anything with third person prospectus. The author condemns the way Weinberg talked about religion while mentioning that he didn’t want to hurt anyone but fairer view recognizes that Weinberg, being as a physicist, has more to contribute to science than religion and his approach not to hurt the feeling of theists is appreciable. Why would a physicist support about the unknown fact about…

    • 945 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Both the scientific community, and religious faithful forget the truthful fact, that neither side can ever be correct. Science is mostly based around theories that are constantly changing, while religion is based on teachings from the Holy Book. Science today features possibilities of genetic engineering and other ways to alter life that religious followers view as unethical. The lack of long term studies should lead to a healthy skepticism of the future of scientific discovery, as there could exist potential repercussions for altering life. Furthermore, the religious community should learn to embrace the possibilities that science holds, because it, like religion, preaches hope for a better tomorrow.…

    • 1476 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    I am a Christian and I believe that all life came to be through God. Science does make it more difficult to believe these days, because they try and explain all of the wonders of God by using science. For a lot of people this has a big impact on their faith and it might cause them to stop believing, but I feel that if your faith is strong enough you can overcome all of these things and still believe. I am also a person that enjoys science but I feel that science can only be used to explain thing up to a point. The things that are still a mystery to us today and that cannot be explained by science are the miracles of God and us as humans should not try and comprehend…

    • 1563 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This embodies the ideas that presented later that discuss the relationship between fundamentalist views and religious views to God and faith. In the fundamentalists view, modern science has an obligation of providing empirical proof that backs up the hypothesized statement on any issue that is under scrutiny, this lacks from many scientists studies. They state that there is no existence of a God or the explanation of faith with no adequate back up to their claims. This is the same with Christians who have a strict devotion to their faith when in fact they are not familiar with what they keep their faith…

    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Atheism Vs Religion

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages

    This further opposes the inclusivity that should encompass the worship of a god as presented by religion. This ideology in a way strengthens the argument of the atheists against religion. The existence of god is seen as a subjective experience where different people have experienced god through different ways for instance through dreams, visions while some have only seen him through the angels (Honderich, 1995). This further negates the assumptions of religion. Questions have also arisen concerning the origin of god where people have found it hard to believe that god might have arisen from nothing.…

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dawkins claims, “they appeal to faith” and “faith is belief in spite of, even perhaps because the lack of evidence” (e). Dawkins is explaining the phenomenon that we call faith. He describes that people back-up religion with faith even though faith shows a lack of evidence. We must therefore question whether faith is good enough to be evidence of Gods existence. My own view on faith is that it is not a strong enough argument for proof of Gods existence.…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    It is possible to prove that truth exists but belief is almost impossible. A belief can be explained in many different ways like the different religions do in explaining the existence of God, but truth can only be explained in only one way, what the proponents of this theory expect. The concept of God’s existence is a belief proposal and not a truth. A belief proposal is not a knowledge whereas a truth is based on the knowledge. When the proponents of the theory of conflicting truths argue against the existence of God, they seem to interpret it as a knowledge and not a belief proposal, and when they fail to find the knowledge to support the existence of God, then they discredit the same existence.…

    • 1726 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Science can be separated into two groups: science and pseudoscience. For science to be scientific, the theory must be testable, and can be proven false. While religion explains the supernaturals; it’s also about having faith and trust in our religion. There have been arguments for and against Gods in our society. However, people can’t win arguments against God because they can’t disprove it.…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics