Analysis Essay On The Call Of The Wild

Analytical Insight on The Call Of The Wild
The typical story of a man and his adventures with his dog is a captivating read for anybody that has a soft spot for dogs in their hearts. It is easy to see why kids would readily snatch a book like The Call of the Wild off the bookshelf. However, its contents tell a different story as oppose to the conclusion that a child first draws when they first see the cover of the book. As a result, The Call of the Wild has been banned in several parts of America as well as other parts of the globe due to its ominous mood, ruthless savagery, and the presence of the author’s compassion for socialism in the book. This research paper contains a multitude of reasons of why the banning of this book is unnecessary, …show more content…
Life in the south is pleasant. Food grows easily; the weather is warm, and there is no struggle. Life is the complete opposite of this in the north. In the north, life is rugged. You have to catch your food or somehow manage to grow it, the cold, bitter wind is constantly biting at you, and life is simply unforgiving. The drastic contrast between the south and the north is not only a difference in setting, but a representation of the different lifestyles of the upper class and the lower class as London has experienced both of those lifestyles. One interesting thing about The Call of the Wild is the point of view it is told from, a dog’s. This gives the readers an opportunity to see what life as a dog is like and how dogs see us. Dogs and humans have a lot of things in common such as our basic needs for life and morals. The main difference between dogs and humans is thought. Dogs act without thought. They do not question the outcome of a situation. Humans ability to think is a liability for them in the Canadian Wilderness. There is no time to question if something is worth it or not for death lurks around every