Alienation In The Contemporary Economy

Improved Essays
An occupation that could cause alienation in the contemporary economy would be workers who assemble computers, smart phones, tablets and all other computer, tablet and smart phone accessories. If a worker works for a company and assembles all the parts of a computer, the worker will come to realize that they are creating products in which they are barely receiving compensation for (comparing the sale price of each product to their labor pay). Secondly, the worker will begin to feel estranged to the product and to their occupation. They will begin to feel estranged and alienated, since the product does not belong to them (as private property) and they are not receiving direct sale profits from the company. But why does this affect …show more content…
Marx states that not just does the worker become alienated, but their self worth becomes degraded. “On the basis of political economy itself, in its own words, we have shown that the worker sinks to the level of a commodity and becomes indeed the most wretched of commodities; that the wretchedness of the worker is in inverse proportion to the power and magnitude of his production” (Marx, 1). Additionally, Marx states that the political economy favors capitalism over labor and the workers. He states that the direction the political economy has taken has been of greed (Marx, 1).
He also states how the political economy has ignored the estrangement in labor and the effects it has (Marx, 3).
He adds that workers do not simply get alienated by labor, but that they receive the least benefits in producing products. He states that for the capitalists it produces palaces, yet for the worker they obtain just hovels, workers produce beauty, yet they get deformed by doing so
(Marx, 3). Marx states that the worker feels free when he is not working and does not feel like himself while he is working. Marx even goes to the extent to state that the worker’s labor is
…show more content…
The worker in our current economy is not indispensable; they can be without a serious thought laid-off or fired from a company without any reason why in most states in the United
States. This system ultimately favors the capitalist and extremely disregards the workers. Marx states, “If the worker’s activity is a torment to him, to another it must give satisfaction and pleasure. Not the gods, not nature, but only man himself can be this alien power over man”
(Marx, 7). Marx states that man is coerced into labor, later in his discourse he adds that his labor activities are done in a service under the power and force of another man (Marx, 7). Other than the political economy being blamed for creating this situation between the laborer and the capitalist, Marx states that private property is also to blame. He states this, since he believes private property is responsible for the condition of the workers for becoming estranged and alienated. “Private property is thus the product, the result, the necessary consequence,

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Marx argued that the bourgeoisie controlled the means of production, wage labour and amassed majority of the wealth as a result, which equated to the power to dominate and define society. The opposing end, the proletariat, were constantly oppressed and left alienated because they maintained no power or ability to rectify their position within society. In addition, specifically within a capitalistic society, there was no opportunity for a meritocracy; so even if the proletariats were highly skilled, they remained pigeonholed with no chance for social mobility without a direct shift within the economic structure of society. When examining this multifarious relationship, Marx asserted in the Manifesto of the Communist Party, “The modern bourgeoisie society that has sprouted from the ruins of feudal society has not done away with class antagonisms. It has but established new classes, new conditions of oppression, new forms of struggle in place of the old ones” (Marx.)…

    • 1263 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For Marx, the bourgeoisie class controlled the manufacturing system and established “new conditions of oppression” to control the proletariat (Marx, 159-160). Therefore, a class struggle existed and it was worsening for the proletariat class as the bourgeoisie were “constantly revolutionizing the instruments of production, and thereby the relations of production, and with them the whole relations of society” (Marx, 161). However, for Marx, the exploitation of the proletariat for capital will not continue as the bourgeoisie are digging their own graves by continuing to oppress the working class (Marx, 169). Also, in contrast to Nietzsche who says that the slaves are weak and hopeless, Marx does not consider the proletariat as inherently weak. In fact, Marx is clear in stating that the “fall and the victory of the proletariat are equally inevitable” especially with the increase in the proletariat’s revolutionary consciousness (Marx, 169).…

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If society eliminated the modern bourgeois system of private property, it would eliminate the perpetual desire of the bourgeois class acquire more private property. By eliminating this desire society would have eliminated the primary desire that drives the exploitation of labor. If labor is no longer beholden to those who own private property for substance than it is impossible for any member of society to exploit laborers. Marx’s proposal to abolish the system of private property would insure that an incident such as the Bangladesh garment factory collapse would not happen because the factory workers labor would be for the sake of the factory worker; their labor would not be beholden to the owners of private property whose pursuit of more property compels them to exploit the…

    • 1830 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Like the classical economists, he focused on the dynamic evolution of capitalism as a system, and the turbulent relationships between different classes. ”(Stanford p.54) During the Mid-nineteenth century, Marx opposed capitalism, believing “payment of profit on private investments did not reflect any particular economic function” (Stanford p.54). Marx is saying that the workers aren’t getting paid for the amount of work they put in. Capitalists were exploiting these workers and rather than sharing the wealth/profits, they were paying the workers a diminished amount (Labor Theory of Value).…

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Carlyle Vs. Marx

    • 1409 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Workers in a capitalistic society are destined to ultimately be destroyed and no longer viewed as a human with equal rights under God’s law (Marx, p. 23-24, 1844). Then and now people are reduced to being seen only as a tool that goes to the repair shop (Cortes, 9 Sept., 2016). The idea that the rich owe nothing more to the poor but the agreed upon wages, no more and no less just like paying for a calculator (Carlyle, p.146-147, 1843). That even their impending death does not entitle them to some kind of help beyond a contract (Carlyle p. 150, 1843).…

    • 1409 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The separation between capitalist and the working class is unfair and uneven. To Marx, “If the wealth of a society is decreasing, the worker suffers most, for although the working class cannot gain as much as the property owners when society is prospering, none suffers more cruelly from its decline than the working class” (Marx, page 284, Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts, First Manuscript). He concludes that this makes a worker a slave to capitalism; his or her spirit chained to the robotic and mechanical motions of labor. He finds that these people become, “depressed, therefore, both intellectually and physically to the level of a machine, and from being a man becomes an abstract activity and a stomach, so he also becomes more and more dependent on every fluctuation in the market price, in the investment of capital and in the whims of the wealthy.” (Marx, page 285, Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts, First Manuscript).…

    • 1826 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Wetbacks followed people from south America and Mexico trying to illegally enter the United States. Due to their social location or, the group memberships that people have because of their location in history and society, they are subjected to conditions here in America we would never experience. Ana’s father could no longer afford to pay for tuition for her schooling so she had to be pulled from the 7th grade. In the US, school up through high school is free because with federal and state taxes we can afford to pay for free and universal primary education.…

    • 1996 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marx said there were two classes of people in the world. The first was the ruling class or as he called them the bourgeoisie [bo͝orZHwäˈzē]. The second was the workers of the world which he called the proletariat [prōləˈterēət] (Kishlansky, 2009). During his lifetime he saw that the bourgeoisie had set up a system were the proletariat were set in a system of wage slavery. As he put it, they were paid a minimum wage for their labor that only gave them enough capital to cover the bare minimum of existence.…

    • 774 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Contrastingly, Marx believes that not all humans are free. Although he is against the class system, he believed that it remained an issue in society and that “there was a strain in all societies because the social organization never kept pace with the development of the means of production” (W.B.E.190b). Marx believed that while the ruling class had freedom the Proletariat did not. They were controlled by their employers and thus, did not have the freedom that the employers, or production owners, had. For example, while the owners of any privately owned means of production could decide to take a day off for whatever reason, the working class beneath them could not.…

    • 1634 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Capital by Karl Marx examines the capitalist economic system. To Marx, while capitalism is undeniably powerful and productive it also serves to limit our ability to exercise our right to freedom, happiness, and equality. The capitalist system of economics is often highlighted as one of the prominent reasons for American prosperity. Therefore it is striking that this work takes issue with it operation. This paper will examine Marx’s ideas about the faults of capitalism.…

    • 1087 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    When Karl Marx (2003) talks about labour in a political economy, he argues that the workers are “degraded to the most miserable sort of commodity” (p. 6)—in other words, the workers are being exploited by owners of private property. He introduces the concept of alienation, describing how workers become externalized not only from their labour and the product of their labour, but also from their species’ being and other workers. This, as a result reduces the workers’ capabilities of seeking their greatest potential, leaving them powerless. While Marx is able to explain how alienated labour is developed, are the ideas around alienation only confined to labour? This paper will discuss the ways in which alienation is conceptualized and applied…

    • 298 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In today’s capitalist society, those who own the means of production must devise ways to rationalize paying their workers at relatively low wages while still trying to earn a profit for their businesses. In this scenario, I will explain how “Moneybags”, the owner of the means of production, rationalizes paying his workers at a factory that assembles cell phone parts, through a Marxist perspective. According to Marx, every day, the worker’s means of subsistence “must therefore be sufficient to maintain him in his normal state as a laboring individual.” Hence, it is imperative that Moneybags pays his workers low enough to maintain a decent profit margin, but not too low so that the workers cannot subsist and reproduce themselves in the workplace.…

    • 1086 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    (Marx). Marx argues that while the workers, like the ones mentioned in both works of literature loose themselves to the capitalist system, doing strenuous labor in exchange for money, money that is used to buy the product they themselves helped produced. “The worker receives a part of the available means of subsistence from the capitalist. For what purpose do these means of subsistence serve him? For immediate [664] consumption.”…

    • 1338 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Karl Marx criticizes capitalism in a multitude of his essays, including the Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844. His critique of capitalism varies from the exploitation of workers to the instability of the capitalist system, but fundamentally his issue with capitalism is the dehumanization of laborers. Marx argues that under capitalism, laborers are dehumanized because they are alienated, or disconnected from fundamental human properties, in four aspects – products of labor, labor, species-being, and human-human relations. The basis of Marx’s theory of alienation is the laborer’s estrangement from his labor, which arises from alienation from the laborer’s object of production. According to Marx in the Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844, “the object which labour produces – labour’s product – confronts it as something alien, as a power independent of the producer” (71).…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marxism in The Hunger Games If there is any perfect representation of Marxism in film it is in The Hunger Games. For this case study, I will be focusing on the first movie of the trilogy. This paper will overview the way Marxism is shown in The Hunger Games using a few examples from the movie. In this paper, I argue that The Hunger Games’ plot line has Marxism theories extremely exposed and almost blatantly exposed. Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels developed Marxism in the early 1900s.…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics