The Problem Of Good Analysis

Improved Essays
An important topic within metaphysical philosophy is theodicy, which works to justify the existence of God even though evil exists. John Hick and Steven Cahn in their respective works, “The Problem of Evil” and “The Problem of Good”, provide valid arguments for the existence and probable non existence of God in the presence of good and evil. Through the reversal of Hick’s argument, I feel that Cahn establishes the illogic behind Hick’s view and proves that because both good and bad will always exist within the world, based on Hick’s reasoning and premises, it is likely that soul making and God do not exist to serve the greater good.
In order for one to truly understand Hick’s missteps in logic, first you must understand what he is trying
…show more content…
He questions Hick on, “ What is the evidence that, as Hick proposes, the horrors of the bubonic plague somehow contribute to a better world? What is the evidence that the beauty of a sunset somehow contribute to a worse world?” (pp. 46-7). If this good and evil serves no real purpose of one day achieving strictly good or strictly evil, than Hick’s ideas of soul making become difficult to argue for. For instance, when someone dies, no matter whether they did good or bad deeds, that evil or good does not die with them. Following Hick’s logic, I exert my free will and choose to step on/kill a beautiful flower when I see it on the sidewalk. Even though Hick may try to justify that the sole evil act I committed would serve in the process of soul making, this point is discreditable because in order for it to be argued, Hick would have to contradict himself when he states, “...the Christian answer must be in terms of a future good great enough to justify all that has happened on the way to it” (p. 43). My one bad act in my lifetime will not serve to aid good after my death because other forms of evil will always still be present on this earth. Like Cahn states after reversing the argument, “...any demonic purpose of soul breaking at work in earthly history must continue beyond this life to achieve more than fragmentary success” (p. 46). Therefore, since no effect would take place on …show more content…
Under the assumption that love is a deep affection towards something, Hick’s ideas on evil creating long standing good become faulty. Following the logic and point of my previous argument, to make individuals suffer immensely and not have it serve a greater purpose is cruelty, not love. Although Hick may try to argue that God’s existence of evil is for humanity to possess free will why make a caveat of that be pain when this pain will not remain present on Earth for other human beings to suffer through and the greater good is unjustifiable.
In conclusion, Hick and Cahn provide differing opinions on the purpose of good and evil within this world. But, Hick’s theodicy has been proven to be illogical through his own contradictions and Cahn’s analysis. The existence of evil does not serve to further good in the world and vice versa. Therefore, the existence of God is

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In this paper I will argue that in Dialogue on Good, Evil, and The Existence of God by John Perry, the dialogue does not disprove the idea of God. This book focuses on three main characters: Gretchen Weirob, Sam Miller, and Dave Cohen and their debates about the existence of God. This drawn-out discussion begins when Miller visits his flu-ridden friend Weirob and asks to pray for her. Weirob immediately declines and this sparks a three-day long conversation, where Cohen joins in later, on who God is, the reason for evils in the world, the concept of freewill, and the possibility of devils. One of the first points discussed by Weirob and Miller is what foundation of God they were going to build off.…

    • 1026 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this paper I will explain and evaluate two popular arguments regarding the existence of God, A Scientific Argument for the Existence of God by Robin Collins and The Inductive Argument from Evil Against the Existence of God by William Rowe; then I will discuss how the conclusions are not compatible with one another due to the conflicting structure of the conclusions as well as how one cannot accept both conclusions without compromising one of the arguments. First I will explain the basis of Collins’ argument, which is one of the most frequently used arguments in favor of theism. In A Scientific Argument for the Existence of God, Collins centers around the observation of how finely tuned the physical constants of the universe are to the ability for any form of life to exist, if any of them were to change even the smallest bit then no life would possibly be able to develop not to…

    • 1636 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    At a young age majority of us grew up believing that there is a higher being above us that created us, that shaped our lives to be where it is now, and that being is known as god. When we were a child, we did not have a choice whether we truly believed in the existence of God. We were told what to believe and never questioned it that belief. In this essay, I will analyze the existence of god between “Does God Exist?” by Ernest Nagel and “Why God Allows Evil” by Richard Swinburne. Although Nagel rejects the existence of God, he establishes two causes for why God exists.…

    • 1614 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    1) In this paper I argue that B.C. Johnson’s argument about the problem of evil and God when it comes to dependence is weak because his work field explanation fails. I will address this argument as the “Dependence Argument.” As you read you will notice the simple addition to the job field he addresses points out holes in his “Dependence Argument.” Johnson’s following argument, which I will call the “Moral Urgency Argument,” provides a similar attack to the theist explanation for God allowing evil, but by taking out the “Dependence Argument” Johnson’s argument becomes stronger.…

    • 1405 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Bibl 104 Research Paper

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The purpose of this philosophical research paper is to attempt to develop an understanding on the concept of suffering while investigating the problem of evil from a theological perspective using scriptural references from the Holy Bible. Evil is the Absence of Good The Bible teaches that God is a powerful and almighty God. Many people wonder why there is so much pain, suffering, and corruption in the world if there is a presumably good God overseeing it. According to the Bible, God could not possibly cause evil since he is a righteous God.…

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When you hear the word evil what thoughts pop-in your head? Do you believe an evil can exist if there’s still a higher power or God? In this essay, I will be discussing Williams Rowe’s argument for atheism based on the Well-Known argument “The Problem of evil and Some Varieties of Atheism”. The problem of evil questions the existence of a God based on the evil in the world. In this paper, I will discuss his reasoning for atheism, I will explain in depth what he means by each premise.…

    • 535 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Julian's Theory Of Evil

    • 1207 Words
    • 5 Pages

    When people discuss the problem of evil or sin, they are more accurately talking about the pain that sin causes. The pain is the substance that humans can feel, understand and analyze. This helps bridge the connection between the problem of evil and the problem of human suffering. Without that pain, there is no result or consequence from sin. As mentioned earlier, Julian thinks that God has good reason for everything.…

    • 1207 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Timothy Keller Critique

    • 967 Words
    • 4 Pages

    He discusses great massacres that lead to the death of hundreds of thousands, even millions. In light of these tragedies the question is bound to be asked, “where is God?” Keller begins by discussing that the existence of evil does not disprove the existence of God. He first quotes Mackie, who stated, “if a good and powerful God exists, he would not allow pointless evil, but because these is much unjustifiable, pointless evil in the world, the traditional good and powerful God could not exist.” Yet Keller counters by saying this, “ tucked away within the assertion that the world is filled with pointless evil is a hidden premise, namely, that if evil appears pointless to me, then it must be pointless.”…

    • 967 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Robert Adams God Claim

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Beginning his essay, Robert Adams brings a specific claim regarding God’s nature to the attention of the reader. This claim, made by many theologians and philosophers, is as follows, “If a perfectly good moral agent created any world at all, it would have to be the very best world that he could create.” While Adams states for us that there are many who hold to this claim regarding the Creator, he is quick to let the reader know that he is not one such person. Arguing that these claims are false, Adams attempts to show that it is consistent with a Judeo-Christian understanding of ethics that God need not create the best of all possible worlds. It is in defense of this main that Adams gives readers scenarios that serve to illustrate his belief that an all-good, all-powerful God must not necessarily create a world that would be completely flawless and exemplary.…

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The evidential problem of evil determines the degree of how much evil must be a part of the evidence of God’s existence. While on the other hand the logical problem of evil is seen through our own eyes. It bares the question whether God is a perfect because of all wrong taking place in the world. Through these two problems it is hard to even imagine that God is perfect. Through Richard Swinburne’s theodicy (theodicy - an attempt to defend God's omnibenevolence in the face of evil) , one comes to find the case that initially escapes the evidential and logical problems…

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The existence of God, a topic discussed in both William Rowe’s and Robin Collins’ papers, but for two very different reasons. The argument of good vs. evil and the existence of an omnipresent, benevolent being such as God is a topic that many find very difficult to find answers for, and will continue to plague mankind for the rest of our existence. After reading the published works of Mr. Collins and Mr. Rowe, one may find it easier to formulate their own opinion. In the publication by Mr. Collins, he addresses the topic of atheism and theism in respect to physics.…

    • 784 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Evil and Omnipotence In Evil and Omnipotence, J.L. Mackie presents fallacious solutions that try solving the logical problem of evil. Fallacious solutions explicitly maintain all their propositions, but implicitly end up rejecting at least one of them. The fourth fallacious solution (S4), claims that moral evil is necessary in any world containing the overriding good of human freedom. In this paper, I will demonstrate: (I) S4; (II) Mackie’s objection of S4; (III) A primary benefit of Mackie’s argument; and (IV) Why Mackie’s criticism succeeds. (I) S4:…

    • 1089 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout the time we have spent so far in this class, we have discussed many different philosophical topics. One of which is why evil, suffering, and pain happen in the world. In our readings, several authors have given several explanations as to why evil exists but only one of the explanations is sufficient. This explanation comes from Michael Tooley’s “The Problem of Evil: Theodicies”. In this reading, he states and debunks four theodicies that religious communities often use in their attempts to explain why God allows evil and suffering in the world.…

    • 935 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of the most persistence questions we as thinking having often tends to challenge the existence of God. That question is, ‘if God is good and made us in His likeness, then why is there evil in the world?’ This question has plagued both theist and philosophers alike. I personally have encountered this very question in both Religious Quest, as well as Philosophy. While the latter concentrates on the logical problem of evil in order to argue that there can not be a perfect God who could then allow evil, the theist believes in an omniscient, omnipotent, and omnibenevolent God.…

    • 1336 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Introduction John Hick, the British Philosopher was born in 1922 in the United Kingdom. Hick is credited as a profound religious epistemologist, philosophical theologian, and religious pluralist (Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2015). Hick contributed largely to the world of theology, writing one of his more famous works, Evil and the God of Love, where the chapter Soul-Making Theodicy is included (Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2015). The attempt to explain the presence of evil, pain, and suffering has been asked and investigated throughout the centuries by philosophers, theologian, and layman alike.…

    • 1508 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays