Analysis: An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, By David Hume

Improved Essays
Malik Rivera
Professor Zoey Lavallee TR9A
10 October 2017 Short Essay Assignment:Topic One David Hume, author of An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, discusses two natural abilities we as human beings possess. Those are ideas and impressions. I agree with Hume when he says ideas are from our thoughts, beliefs, or memories. Hume’s view point on our thoughts, beliefs, and memories, and how they come from our perception was something I thought was justified well with evidence. This causes us to create, and expand our thinking. This is where the term ideas comes from. According to Hume, impressions come through our senses, emotions, and other mental development. After the reading I came to the conclusion that Impressions and ideas are entwined with each other in Hume’s eyes, because we connect our ideas to our impressions naturally in three ways (resemblance, contiguity, and cause and effect).
Resemblance is using our past experiences in a specific instance to determine its outcome. Hume would say we used resemblance to from similar predictions. Resemblance is overall moving from impression to idea. It’s made for you to flashback and compare to something from your memory. For example, moving from seeing an object in person to thinking about it.
Contiguity in a place and time is Hume’s second principle of association. This is moving
…show more content…
These three principles define and make up these ideas and impressions. He used these two types of perceptions, and justified both of them to his principles. Hume once stated “ A wise man proportions his belief to the evidence”.Throughout my reading I was skeptical at first, then as I kept reading it became clearer as to what he was trying to get across. The evidence was being laid out. Hume is an author I look forward to reading more from in the

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Essay 3 Given what we know or can safely assume to be true of animal brains and behaviors, do animals actually exhibit thought and reason? The answer depends in large measure on one’s definition of thought and reason. Philosophers René Descartes and David Hume hold conflicting views about the nature and possession of thought and reason and, as a result, offer starkly different arguments for and against the existence of thought and reason in animals. While Descartes maintains in Part Five of Discourse on Method that only humans are capable of conscious thought, Hume asserts that human and animal behaviors are not so different in Section Nine of his An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding.…

    • 1808 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    He argues that the analogy between the universe and human creations, such as machines is weak, since the universe is not really as obviously similar to a machine as the argument claims. The arrangement, composition, and workings of the universe are extremely different from a man-made machine. He explains that even a single and small difference between the effects of two things can reveal great differences between the causes. This refutation of the argument is plausible, since it shows that an argument from analogy only works effectively when the things we're comparing are extremely similar, but the universe is totally different from a machine or watch. Also, Hume argues that we have only limited exposure to a part of the universe, yet we're taking attributes based on imperfect observations of that small part, such as order, design, and intelligence and using them to make a claim about the whole universe.…

    • 1287 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Have you seen a book and a movie relate to each other with these two really do? The similarities and differences of Forgotten Fire by Adam Bagdasarian and the film, it's called Empire Of The Sun by Steven Spielberg this movie it's a coming out of age story is also a drama. Well, the meaning of a similarity is the state or fact of being a similar or similar feature. The description of the word difference is a point or the way in which people or things are not the same.in the next paragraph, it will talk about some similarities that Vahan and Jim both had.…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    He feels as if there was no “constant”, but instead, a casual contact among perceptions. Locke, however, feels that consciousness is what ties together the mind and body In conclusion, both John Locke and David Hume had interesting ideas on self-identity. While still having credible observations, I feel that Hume, in not accepting anything more than a bundle of impressions, left out much of the human experience, such that when the human is studied solely on a scientific level, without thought to his emotional being, much is left out and misunderstood.…

    • 1500 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why You Reckon Analysis

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In our world today, money is seen to be something that is needed to be successful or happy in life. People with less money tend to look up to those with more money in that way. In the short story, "Why, You Reckon?" Langston Hughes uses a colored man's point of view in a pre-Civil Rights Movement Era to show that even if someone has money, it doesn't mean they have a happy life. Money is the center of anything and everything today.…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animals don’t have feelings. This is the argument used for ages to support harsh experimentation on animals. In theory, empirical knowledge relies on the use of laboratory animals to conduct experiments. Time and time again these arguments have been disproved as unnecessary. Laws have been created to protect animals from preventable harm.…

    • 543 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    An important topic within metaphysical philosophy is theodicy, which works to justify the existence of God even though evil exists. John Hick and Steven Cahn in their respective works, “The Problem of Evil” and “The Problem of Good”, provide valid arguments for the existence and probable non existence of God in the presence of good and evil. Through the reversal of Hick’s argument, I feel that Cahn establishes the illogic behind Hick’s view and proves that because both good and bad will always exist within the world, based on Hick’s reasoning and premises, it is likely that soul making and God do not exist to serve the greater good. In order for one to truly understand Hick’s missteps in logic, first you must understand what he is trying…

    • 882 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Copy Principle: Prompt One David Hume, in the book, “An Enquiry of Human Understanding,” denies the thought that ideas are innate or come from within us. Instead, he claims that all ideas, when they are first experienced are derived or duplicated from simple impressions or world experiences. This is known as Hume’s Copy Principle. To prove his hypothesis, Hume divides his argument into two sections.…

    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Boethius’ Knowledge Growth In The Consolation of Philosophy, by Boethius, Boethius writes about how Lady Philosophy helped him finally gain wisdom and see the truth of happiness. At the start of his imprisonment, Boethius was only thinking/writing through emotion, slowly he grew mentally and was able to develop a work that went from emotion to reason. Lady Philosophy gave him the stepping stones that he needed to be able to achieve what he has now.…

    • 1337 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    David Hume and Immanuel Kant are both known for their great contributions to moral philosophy. Hume who is mainly known for his empiricism, skepticism and naturalism and Kant who is best recognized for his great work in metaphysics, ethics and also for his contributions in others disciplines in the area of philosophy. Although they were both exceptional philosophers and gave stupendous apports, Hume and Kant agreed nor differed in various aspect and ideas. Hume believed and is mostly based on his empiricism which involves the theory of the mind. Hume’s empiricism consist in to affirm that the moral foundation is not in the reason but in the senses.…

    • 746 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He was one of the first to try to develop a theory of philosophy of mind, and he especially focused on personal identity. Hume believed that self was just a fiction that we have created to describe our impression and perception (526). In order to make it more clear, we have to go Hume’s problem of induction. Hume focuses in on cause and effect in An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding. He succinctly states “…That causes and effect are discoverable, not by reason but by experience…”(543).…

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ideas are defined as whatever is perceived or understood about something; despite this simple denotation, humankind 's capacity to acquire and understand these complex thoughts remains a controversy in philosophical literature. As major role models in the foundation of modern philosophy, Descartes and Locke feud over the definition of these ideas, the acquisition of these concepts, and the content of these thoughts. Descartes identifies with a rationalistic view where knowledge is based on innate ideas and these ideas are acquired through reason, whereas Locke believes in empirical explanations which state that ideas are formulated from sensory experiences with the outside world. In many of Descartes’ works, he emphasizes the importance of…

    • 1575 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In an attempt to make his case for these claims, Hume advances what we now call the justice argument. The basic idea is…

    • 1117 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Two of the most intriguing schools of philosophy are the two which deal specifically with epistemology, or, what is better known as the origin of knowledge. Although they are not completely opposite of one another, they are argued in depth by two of the most famous philosophers in history. The origins of study in rationalism and empiricism can be found in the 17th century, during a time when various significant developments were made in the fields of astronomy and mechanics. These advancements undoubtedly led to the questions that probed the sudden philosophical argument: What do we truly know? Many people throughout history began to question whether science was really providing them with the true knowledge of reality.…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    As time passes, knowledge becomes more complex and philosophers start to develop different theories regarding how people come about this knowledge. There is a distinct difference between both Rationalism and Empiricism and both Descartes and Locke have found ways to discredit and support both views. Descartes argument towards Rationalism is much stronger than Hume's argument towards Empiricism. There is quite the distinction between both empiricism and rationalism. The major difference between rationalism and empiricism concerns their knowledge basis.…

    • 1317 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays