Kristen Ross Essay: The Value Of Voting

To say one is a democrat, is often an action without thought, but when said thought is applied, whether or not one are a democrat becomes a question much easier asked than answered; there is a great deal of thought that must go in to giving that question an educated response. Kristen Ross goes against the societal grain, and expresses that for various reasons she is not. Her essay gives a well research explanation as to why she feels such a way, providing the reader with valuable insight on her uncommon opinion. The value of voting, a modern day staple in any democracy, is criticized for its purpose. It is pointless to ask the opinion of the people only to tell them that they have given the wrong answer and must revote. When these situation occur, the government then begins to speak for the silent majority, stigmatizing the vocal minority, arguing that they are against the greater good. Democracy has lost much of its original meaning. No longer is it a form of government, but a form of justification used as a counter weight to communism. The purpose of a voting is to represent the opinions of the voters, and if it does not accomplish that, than there is no point in …show more content…
On the topic of a revote, there is little need for it in a truly democratic society. Instead of simply using their previous support for Ireland against them and forcing a revote, the constitution should have been amended and then voted on. This would have helped get the European Union the votes they wanted without belittling the Irish and pressuring them to vote with in a way they were not comfortable. True democracy is not about number, or getting motions passed, it is about being representative of the people. If a revote is simply going to be forced until the desired results are achieved, than it serves no purpose. Whether the population is voting or not, their opinion no longer matters, and there is no accountability for the