Andrew Sullivan's Against Gay Marriage

Improved Essays
Marriage is by definition between a man and a woman. Is traditional marriage coming to an end? Is the meaning and definition of marriage changing? There are different positions on gay marriage, for and against. In an argument written by Andrew Sullivan called For Gay Marriage, it talks about different things in support of gay marriage. In another argument written by William, J. Bennet called Against Gay Marriage it talks about different things in support against gay marriage.
In the first argument by Andrew Sullivan, it goes over the different things that help support gay marriage. First, it talks about, what marriage is and how it is not a private contract between two people but a social and public recognition of a private commitment. Next
…show more content…
Bennet, it goes over the different things that are in support against gay marriage. First, it talks about the Hawaii Supreme Court discovering the legal union of same-sex couples and says that Hawaii will become the first state to sanction the union of same-sex couples and that other states will follow. Next, it talks about a conservative argument, allowing marriage in order to promote faithfulness and monogamy, and says that that is an intelligent and politically shrewd argument. Also, Bennet says that he believes that overall allowing same-sex marriages would do significant, long-term social damage. It says that it would be the most far-reaching step ever to be taken in the deconstruction of society’s most important institution and that we should not take that step. Then it talks about broadening the definition of marriage to include same-sex marriages and that it would stretch it almost beyond recognition and new attempts to stretch it even further would follow. For example, the argument says, on what principled grounds could the advocates of same-sex marriage oppose the marriage of two consenting brothers or how could they explain why we should deny a marriage license to a bisexual who wants to marry two people? Bennet says, “after all, doing so would be a denial of that person’s sexuality.” After that, it talks about a statement of Andrew Sullivan and how he as an advocate of same-sex marriage, has said that a homosexual marriage …show more content…
Bennet’s arguments on gay marriage can be compared and contrasted in different ways. First being contrasted by, Sullivan saying that gay marriage is in no way taking a step into the dark, while Bennet saying that he believes it would be socially damaging. Secondly compared by both of them talking about changing the definition of marriage and the effects of changing that definition. Finally, being contrasted when, in Sullivan’s argument he talked about the definition of marriage being changed and certain people not being able to get married, while Bennet also talked about the changed definition and why wouldn’t two brothers be allowed to get

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    In conclusion, Jordan wanted the state to restrict same-sex marriage but allow private homosexual acts between consenting adults (April Elliot). David Boonin does not believe that Jeffrey Jordan’s argument is sound here. Boonin’s thoughts on same-sex marriages are that governments should sanction them and that people should have the right to marry whomever they want. Boonin adds that Jordan’s second claim is problematic because he does not do a good job of distinguishing the public disagreement. Jordan speaks of the public dilemma as two distinct subjects of disagreement (Rachels).…

    • 1804 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1). People want marriage to be between a man and a woman but the government cannot define the word marriage. Same-sex couples feel discriminated by all the negatives they say about it. Many support the idea of civil unions rather than full marriage between gay couples. Civil unions are not fully equivalent to marriage and withdraw same sex couples of equal rights.…

    • 1089 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They also wanted the same benefits as heterosexual couples, like Social Security. Another opinion was the opposition of gay marriage. These people believed that gay marriage disrupted religious beliefs because the bible stated that only a man and a woman could marry. People against same sex marriage also stated that a couple can only have sex if their intentions are to have a baby, but because same sex couples cannot do this, they are sinful. However, many shifted their opinion as the fight continued.…

    • 1829 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Importantly, the proponents of gay marriages indicate that the world, through its judicial systems, is attempting to limit their rights to wed. Contrastingly, the opponents of the act state that it is against natural law that advocates for heterosexual relationships. Consequently, it is…

    • 1481 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Present day 2016 57% of Americans support same-sex marriage, and 39% oppose it (Mordecai). If 16% of Americans are for polygamy, where does that put the number of those who oppose it? The legalization of gay marriage has raised many questions and concerns regarding the possibility of other infrequent practices becoming legalized, polygamy, however is not the next gay marriage. Why would polygamy be a bad thing? If three or more people want to get married why should they be prohibited from doing so?…

    • 1793 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This topic is so controversial it has gone far as being considered an infringement. Since the beginning of time, the world has told us that a woman and a man are supposed to be together. We are taught that gay marriage is untraditional and unethical. Some cultures even go as far as…

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many gay couples rushed to get married once the state level bans were lifted. Now that the federal government has recognized gay marriage, many states counties are still failing to recognize gay couples right to marriage. The premise is that gay marriage is immoral and considered a sin in most religions, so it should be banned and marriage should only count between men and women. The argument is that people who are attracted to someone of their same sex has nothing to do with their ability to receive the same basic rights as straight couples. The argument is when denying same-sex couples the right to marry, is discriminatory and a violation of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution.…

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    California is an example, since The California Supreme Court ruled that gay marriages were constitutional. The opponents decided to ban together to get the proposition 8 included into law. Proposition 8 was all about putting the traditional definition of marriage into the California’s constitution (Schubert and Flint, 2015). Other states have also worked to modify their constitutions to either get same sex marriages ban or allowed. In recent years, more politicians have spoken up for gay marriages.…

    • 967 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, it would not be fair to exclude the viewpoints of those who still actively hinder the progression of gay marriage. IV. Sub-topic 1 (antithesis) A. Some believe homosexual marriage ruins the sanctity of marriage, which is supposed to be between one man and one woman for religious reasons. B. Insert quote here about gay marriage from a different political perspective.…

    • 1379 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gay marriage is likewise alluded to as same sex marriage. Same sex connections happen when men and ladies are pulled in to somebody of the same sexual orientation as themselves. As indicated by numerous adversaries, gay relational unions can be portrayed as a greater amount of the deserting of sexual orientation refinements since one can 't have same sex marriage while as yet trusting that sex is pertinent. Consequently, same sexual orientation getting hitched precludes the undeniable reason from securing marriage between a man and lady which is reproduction. This exploration will investigate the contentions for and against gay relational unions and the religious perspective of same sex relational unions.…

    • 1184 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays