Similarities Between Marx And Nozick

Marx and Nozick make compelling arguments against inequality, however, their arguments fall short when compared to arguments in favour of equality. Equality is a level of impartiality either in services or wealth for citizens to provide fair opportunities. Citizens have some uniform treatment by the state in order to remove barriers between individuals. These contentions vary between levels of intrusive means; they allow more or less freedom for citizens. More equality stems from more intrusion, or less equality from less intrusion. While Marx and Nozick fall on either side of the spectrum of government intervention, arguments for equality take a middle ground to find a balance between the need for social assistance in removing barriers and not taking too much of their individual agency. The preferred system of equality will be discussed following an analysis of Marx and Nozick. …show more content…
His ideas involve a redistribution of wealth that gives individuals what they need based on their life circumstances. This restricts human agency in their ability to use the fruits of their labour for their own needs. Instead, their earnings are redistributed to create an equal society. While this is beneficial for the community, individuals are constrained. They cannot properly benefit from their hard work as their earnings are not fully enjoyed. This high level of redistribution is helpful for those that are less fortunate, but is also negative for individuals who do not need that level of high redistribution and could benefit from a more basic level of