Analysis Of Last Session By C. S. Lewis

Improved Essays
“The Christian and the Secularist hold different beliefs about the universe. They can’t both be right. The one who is wrong will act in a way which simply doesn’t fit the real universe.”
Elaboration- C. S. Lewis one of the most renowned theologians of time, made this statement about only one belief system truly making sense. In Freud’s Last Session by Mark St. Germain, is written as a conversation between Freud and Lewis about their theologies and the arguments for their respective viewpoint. Within this debate both Lewis and Freud made both strong and weak arguments. The strongest argument Lewis made referred to morals while Freud conquered the practicality of Christ’s teaching, even so Lewis’s weakest argument was founded on the idea of myth similarly Freud’s dealt with other deities and myths.
Within St. Germain’s play
…show more content…
The strongest claim Lewis makes is the assertion that without a preset of right and wrong one cannot believe in a set of morals. Towards the beginning of the play Lewis plays devil’s advocate with Freud by asking if the Nazi’s were correct in their actions. Freud responded with a sound no, prompting Lewis to make the point that “there is a morality you’re comparing them with. A man can’t call a line crooked unless he knows what a straight line is” (13). After Freud makes a feeble attempt to dismiss Lewis, Lewis states that, “moral conscience is something we’re born with. It grows as we do. When I was younger, I thought about right and wrong as much as a baboon thinks about Beethoven” (13). Without first understanding the concept of what is right and moral, one cannot understand what is

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    The Roman church had not yet been visited and had no New Testament because the gospels were not yet being circulated in their final written form. Thus, this letter may well have been the first piece of Christian literature the Roman believers had seen. In Roman culture to choose to be a servant was unthinkable. Paul was a Roman citizen but chose to be entirely dependent on and abide in Christ Jesus (Romans 1:1). Paul’s impact was made known because of his citizenship and willingness to serve and obey Jesus…

    • 1432 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Counterclaims to non-Christian Beliefs Are the teachings of Jesus Christ actually credible and reliable? Was Christ’s resurrection different from any other mans’? Is Christ merely a legend? In the essay, author, C.S Lewis seeks to persuade readers with counter claims against Christian beliefs. Born in Belfast, Northern Ireland, Lewis was raised in the Anglican Church.…

    • 515 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    An analysis of C.S. Lewis’ The Abolition of Man C.S. Lewis carefully weaves pathos and logos throughout his Abolition of Man in order to create an argument that is rooted in logic, and supported by emotion, leading to both the mind and heart of the reader identifying with Lewis’ claims. Lewis’ carefully constructed arguments are consistently followed up with emotionally charged analogies that add another element to his already made claims. The Abolition of Man is divided into three segments in which Lewis makes various claims that build upon each other. In the first chapter, “Men Without Chests” Lewis discusses the “modern” point of view that all things in the world are subjective.…

    • 1174 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Dualism can be defined as dividing life into two separate categories, the first being secular and the second being spiritual. Secular involves things within the physical and changing world in which humans live. Sacred includes things related to the spiritual and unchanging existence of God. Secular is evident in places/activities such as education, business, arts, sciences, government, hobbies, and entertainment. Sacred is only involved in church-related activities.…

    • 1243 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In “Reasonable Religious Disagreements,” Richard Feldman posits that two reasonable peers cannot come to a reasonable disagreement. The premise of a “reasonable disagreement” has various conditions, in short being that the peers must be epistemic, and they must have shared all of their evidence pertaining to the argument. By this criteria, it is not plausible for two epistemic peers with access to the same body of evidence to ever reach reasonably different conclusions. However, a problem arises with the previously stated criteria when examining the point regarding full disclosure of evidence. When examining Feldman’s article from this perspective, it is possible that it may not be considered fully viable.…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thus, Christianity is in Schelling’s perspective the only recipient of the divine revelation that once again discloses God’s spiritual oneness to humanity. However, although he decides to prioritize a particular tradition, the result of Schelling’s exploration of monotheism is God as the unfathomable unity of the three potencies. Moreover, we have to keep in mind God’s absolute freedom as regard having or not a relationship to being, or to any form of presentation of himself. Thus, it is fair to say that in Schelling’s view God is free enough to deny himself as Trinity. Hence, on one hand the Trinity is the best presentation possible of God’s essence as it reflects the three principles in their relationship with one another and with God.…

    • 689 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Persuasion relies on means of communication that influences beliefs, attitudes, and values. Philosophers throughout the course of history have encountered many dilemmas involving such. Galileo Galilei, an Italian philosopher is a prime example of a man who faced resistance in his act of persuasion. Considering his background, Galileo’s agenda was to argue the value of the Bible against the many discoveries of science. His pro science position, created a discrepancy amongst the people.…

    • 785 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    C. S. Lewis, in his classic work “Mere Christianity,” describes a basic Christian worldview. A significant theme of the book is on what the issues of morality means for the human race, as well as what morality means in relation to God and to one another. Where does morality come from and how does one become moral? Morality originates with God, Lewis argues, nor can man be truly moral apart from the transforming work of Jesus Christ.…

    • 953 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Abolition of Man and That Hideous Strength by C.S. Lewis are novels based on lectures given by the author that pursue the theme of man lacking empathy. Within the first book, The Abolition of Man, Lewis describes the importance of basing all judgments we make on what he calls the Tao: the conception of human behavior that, historically and in different moral traditions, has been considered good. As an emotion is not a judgment, it can be said that emotions and feelings do not respond to logical reasons—yet, they can be reasonable or unreasonable. Lewis states that “the heart never replaces the head; but it can, and must, obey it” (The Abolition of Man 19). Therefore, if Aristotle says that the aim of education is to get the student to have predilections and aversions for what corresponds, “the duty of the modern educator is not to cut down forests, but to irrigate deserts”, that is, the way to help the student to defend oneself properly against false feelings is to inculcate fair feelings (The Abolition of Man 13-14).…

    • 1837 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Cosmological Argument

    • 2037 Words
    • 9 Pages

    In the middle of the 17th century, thinkers in the enlightenment began to question how belief in the existence of a monotheistic God could be rationally supported. A number of arguments for and against the existence of God emerged at this time, and while the philosophical debate on the existence of God is still in session, the initial dust has settled. At this point in time, it is abundantly clear that a the cosmological argument is untenable at both a metaphysical and empirical level, and that the various versions of the cosmological argument fail to support the existence of God. There is good reason for critically examining the cosmological argument. Theists have made a claim that God exists.…

    • 2037 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The mistake made by some is how each sees God differently and believe in God. Lewis shared in "The Rival Conceptions of God" that practicing atheist believe that all other religions are wrong, no exceptions (Lewis, 2009). Lewis shared that humanity was thought to be divided into majority and minority. Lewis shared that the majority believe there is a God or Gods that exist and a few, the minority, believe there is no God (Lewis, 2009). Christianity is among the majority which includes Greeks, Romans, and Platonists.…

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    From a biblical counseling perspective, there is section of psychoanalysis could be related to scripture. However, Freud’s deterministic view of humanity conflicts with the Bible’s teaching about redemption and renewed life. The core structure of psychoanalysis can be provide an insightful view of human personality when aligned with scripture. The relation between id, ego, and superego can explain a Christian tendency to want to obey God’s will, but struggle to…

    • 719 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Christina Hoff Sommers’ article “Teaching the Virtues”, she begins describing an article she wrote where she condemns the manner in which American colleges teach ethics. Sommers emphasizes that higher educational institutions neglect teaching students about private morality and are too focused on teaching social policy, which in turns “.... gives students the wrong ideas about ethics.” She argues that we must deal with both of them. Although her colleague disagrees and disapproves of Sommers sentiment and believes that Sommers wasted effort on pushing bourgeois morality and virtue is causing harm on enlightening students’ on their social sense of right and wrong, she concedes when she realized that her students had cheated on their take…

    • 838 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sigmund Freud’s theory of the unconscious and his method, psychoanalysis are a manifestation of revolution against the psychology of his time. And, Karl Marx’s ideas are also in contrary to the perception of society of the pre-Marxist era. Both philosophers have a common ground of thinking from which their thinking grows which can be summarized in three statements: (1) of all one must doubt (omnibus est dubitandum); (2) I believe nothing human to be alien to me (nihil humanum a mihi alienum puto); (3) the truth shall make you free. The first statement corresponds to the general mood of the modern era, to doubt all things that the senses perceive the hearsay, and the beliefs of the ancient and medieval time. All of the things that were assumed as true are all put to subjection for doubt.…

    • 1202 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The War between Science and Religion “Science can destroy religion by ignoring it as well as disproving its tenets. No one ever demonstrated, so far as I am aware, the nonexistence of Zeus of Thor – but they have few followers now.” Sir Arthur C. Clarke In the beginning there was nothing: just darkness. Then out of nothing appeared everything.…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays