An Advantages And Disadvantages Of The Scramble For Africa

Amazing Essays
Firstly, the scramble for Africa was the invasion and imperialistic takeover of the African continent by European countries in the nineteenth century. In the past, in the eighteenth century, trading of slaves was the main source of profit for the Europeans, but “political instability, lack of transportation, and the unhealthy climate”1 all created disadvantages for the Europeans to move further into the African continent. In the nineteenth century, many things changed. The scramble for Africa was a fairly quick process, the scramble started in the mid-1800s and by the early 1900s pretty much all of Africa had been colonized by Europe, or was currently colonized by Europe. As European countries became more industrialized, and the need for products …show more content…
The scramble for Africa and colonization of African nations caused increased abuse towards native Africans, Africans were stripped of their precious natural resources, African governments became based off of the government of the European country that colonized them, and new technologies from Europe were introduced to native Africans, as well as, new languages and cultural norms. Africans in some colonies were treated harshly. For example, in Portugal, even though native Portuguese people tended to not like Africans, Portuguese men raped African women and had biracial children with them. Even though these children were equally dependent on both their father and mother, the fathers usually never claimed or cared for their biracial children, “[there] was much abuse in this system.”9 Africans in some colonized territories although “free” since they were in their own homes and own country, were still enslaved in the sense that, they had to obey the leaders of the European country that was colonizing them, as well as, follow their rules and laws. In some areas, Africans were even forced into labor. While some European countries like the British treated Africans a bit better than their counterparts, it wasn’t all peachy keen. Another thing the scramble for Africa caused was that it stripped the natives of their countries natural resources. Local native Africans who …show more content…
Every European country that was a part of the scramble for Africa, had a different approach to how they would govern their new region. There were many effects that resulted from the scramble for Africa, some positive, some negative. As industrialization became a greater and greater force in Europe, the Europeans needed more products to create jobs and such to balance out the effects of industrialization. The Europeans wanted to pursue imperialist maneuvers to expand their economic presence in Africa, as well as, appear as a powerful nation to their other European counterparts. The Europeans also wanted to extend their Westernized ideas to the continent of Africa, this led to amplified human rights abuses against Africans, confiscation of valuable African natural resources, the adaptation of Westernized political ideals in African governments, the use of new technologies to make and harvest new products, as well as, the creation of new languages and cultural behaviors within imperialized African

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    As aforementioned, slave trade caused for a changed perception of guns and violence. Many Africans evolved to believe that killing other Africans or enslaving them was the right thing to do, at least to make money that is (M’bokolo 151). Due to the constant influx of Europeans, some European culture spread to Africa. It introduced new ideas to African society, such as Christianity (“Impact of Slave Trade”). Slavery also created a poorer image of African society.…

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The African culture was decimated because of their savage ways of life. All countries and bodies of power that claimed their piece of Africa justified their hostility by educating a ferocious nation. They needed to provide for their mother countries or strong powers and because the African were a weaker people, it was their destiny to fall and not evolve due to their unfit nature. Other regions that were impacted by the African slave trade include… They were impacted by … The devastating impacts of the African slave trade still outlast the country and have…

    • 1255 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Colonization can be a good thing and a bad thing. When the Europeans came to Africa, they thought they would help them by colonizing them but of course with a price. The Europeans did not help the Africans enough for what they took from them. They said that they would colonize them if they could have a few mountains. The Europeans soon took everything, including the people.…

    • 557 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The disturbance of the slave trade was massive: the connections between kingdoms and the overall social hierarchies were changed. In some decentralized social orders, individuals advanced new styles of leadership that prompted more inflexible, progressive structures, thought to better guarantee security. What 's more, European forces interceded in the political process to prevent the uprise of the African centralized societies that would have hampered their operations. Additionally, doubt and abnormal state of mind among African tribes happened as the Africans were catching and offering their own particular people into slavery to take care of the Europeans high demand for slaves. Numerous African societies had varied dialects, because of the strong influence of the Europeans.…

    • 1218 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Imperialism can be defined as the extension of a nation’s power over other lands. European countries desperately wanted to take over colonies in Africa since it provided them with a lot of benefits. Great Britain, France, Germany, Belgium, Italy, Spain and Portugal all placed almost all regions of Africa under their rule (Spielvogel and McTighe 231). European powers were iFn constant rivalries because each of them wanted the continent to their advantage. As these conflicts started to rise, Portugal called for the Berlin Conference of 1884, which was organized by Otto Von Bismarck, to peacefully divide up the continent of Africa (Spielvogel and Mctighe 233-234).…

    • 1293 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The effective enslavement of Africans by Europeans was due to the lack of a united African nation. There is a false preconception that the European imperialists had no help in garnering such a high quantity of Africans to use for cheap labor. Their mission would not be the success that it was without the help of Africans who sold each other into slavery. Europeans took advantage of the isolated tribes that were spread all across sub-saharan Africa. The idea of divide and conquer was partly accomplished before their ships had even reached the African coasts.…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Europeans to stop the internal slave trade and spread civilization and education is often stated as… the main reason for the partition of Africa” is a very debatable statement. There were many reasons for the Europeans to expand into Africa during the 19th century. Many different motives of the Europeans were questioned, such as civilization, education, putting a stop to the slave trade and to spread their word about Christianity (Colonialism). However, the more probable reasons for their expansion were mainly to strengthen their economic and political power. By 1870, the take over of British and European powers against Africa was well underway.…

    • 586 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Unsurprisingly, forcibly removing someone from their home and enslaving them to work on another continent, if they did not die on the dangerous trip there, does not foster peaceful relationships. This tension, built upon hostilities over colonization, and other poor treatment of African people, has helped contribute to the violence in Africa in the past. Furthermore, it is clear Europeans, and in turn, Americans, have always had a superiority complex towards Africans. This would lead to views of Africans as being inferior, which can lead to ideas of them being less civilized, and more dangerous. This compounds on the actual violence in Africa, and results in the world viewing the entire continent and African population as violent and…

    • 1784 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Africans are usually told that their present state of their own society comes from their “savage” and “ugly” participation during the slave trade. Nevertheless, some historians have done some research, and some of the assumptions that Europeans have made about Africa, was the belief that African economies must have been inactive. It led to the assumptions that Africa weakness and even inherent mediocrity. Most of these assumptions have led to stereotypes that can actually question the humanity of Africans. The type of slavery that actually existed in Africa before the affects of the Trans-Atlantic slave trade was actually very different, and it is more likely that the sale of innocent human beings only began when the Europeans have arrived.…

    • 1488 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Black people create their own culture, but the laws separated slavery, indentured servitude, and free labor by race, they still did not free. On the other hand, rebellions occurred because of labor’s dissatisfaction of their master and law. However, the consequence of the rebellion especially Bacon’s Rebellion, which not only increased the racial tension between black labor and white planters, but also pushed governors to strengthen the law with more restriction. The world of European slavery would be destroyed in the end, because Racial discrimination and the trade of labor legally and formally which is a legal…

    • 1160 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays