An Act Ethically Right

Improved Essays
All human beings have free will to make decision but more importantly, everyone have good will. For Kant, good will has “whole value in itself” and “ its usefulness or fruitlessness can neither add to nor take away anything from this value”. Likewise, most individual would act to get something good out of it. However, the moral value of an act cannot rest on the consequences because a will is only good when it is good in itself and not what it accomplishes. Therefore, it is essential for Kant that one’s intention and reason play factors in determining whether an act is ethically right because one must act of duty for duty’s sake. To determine whether an act is ethically right, Kant proposed the categorical imperative to show that a person is

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Immanuel Kant On Duty

    • 1621 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Philosophy is a discipline that studies how one ought to live, as well as study reality, nature, existence, etc. However, there are a number of philosophers who propose differing sets of morals and have different ideas of living life to its fullest (Singer v. Mill). Kant proposes that moral actions are defined by the motivation of an action, and later on explains that moral actions are duties through reason, rather than inclination. This essay will explain the validity of Kant’s argument by first explaining Kant’s view on duty, then analyse his view of duty as an object of good will, which pertains to motivations without the slightest selfishness, then argue for moral duties motivated by duty instead of inclination based on reason. It is difficult…

    • 1621 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    He believes that “A good will is not good because of what it effects or accomplishes, nor because of its fitness to attain some proposed end, it is good only through its willing.” (Kant) Kant believes that we should act in such a way that we…

    • 1487 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Some people may think determining the morality of an action as an easy task, and fail to realize that it is no easy task. Every action is driven by other actions, and depending on the circumstances, an act may be moral in some cases and not in others. This is why Kant favors the Categorical Imperative when compared to other methods of determining morality. The Categorical Imperative does not deal with circumstances, instead it denotes an all-encompassing rule that, if obeyed, means actions would be moral no matter what the situation may be. He first describes the Categorical Imperative when he states, “I should never act except in such a way that I can also will that my maxim should become a universal law” (Kant 14).…

    • 267 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Selfishness In Ishmael

    • 1781 Words
    • 8 Pages

    This attitude feeds into Kant’s theory that it’s “our good will to do things whether the…

    • 1781 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Kant claimed that we are likewise autonomous beings, equipped with the freedom to act and make moral decisions. He concluded that these abilities enforce us to oblige to moral laws and codes. Kant highlighted that maximising overall happiness and pleasure does not justify the morality of an action; making a person happy does not make them virtuous. Although…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Kant is a firm believer of duty based ethics, meaning that one’s morality is defined by ones motives. Thus, Kant believes that an action should be performed simply because it’s the right thing to do, and for no other reason. Also, Kant states that duty defines intrinsic value, meaning that a person’s motives for what they do should have ends within themselves, without consequences or desired satisfaction being built into their actions. Kant also states the one should act so that the maximum of your action can and should be made into universal law, expressing that the actions of your motives should apply to everyone in the same way. Thus, bringing us to the fact that action from duty has to be an categorical imperative, meaning that everyone should and would be able to act the same way, sharing equal positioning.…

    • 1295 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The rightness or wrongness of actions does not depend on their consequences, but on whether the moral reason is “from duty”. Actions done “in conformity with duty” or out of self-interest, have no moral worth to Kant. Duty is defined as an individual’s rational understanding of the action their pursuing. This relates to an action’s maxim, which is what you’re doing and why you’re doing it. Two main principles are used to further Kant’s theory, one being the principle of universalizability.…

    • 1103 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Kant has defined a will so good that it does not have to by entirely good, but it needs to be the highest of all goods. This good will, as defined by Kant, is not good because of its effects but as itself. Reason, in this manner, is almost not needed for certain tasks as instincts are perfectly capable of replacing reason. Furthermore, the concept of one’s duty goes hand in hand with Kant’s good will. Goodness is not a result from acting on an impulse of an individual’s belief of Mother Nature.…

    • 334 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    What Is Ethically Right

    • 206 Words
    • 1 Pages

    The view that what is ethically right is relative to each and every person. if person A believes bribery is ethical, it is; if person B believes bribery is unethical, it is. Moreover, if I think that God who judges us when we die, I am right (God exists and is the judge), and the atheist is wrong; however, the individual relativist also says that the atheist is correct the arguments about what is right and wrong are pointless, no matter how sure you are that they have done something wrong. Further, David Kyle Johnson in Philosphy and Pop Calcture explains individual relativism has unwelcome consequences if true. If individual relativism was true, being racist would be the morally acceptable attitude and “true for them.”…

    • 206 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In accordance with Immanuel Kant’s Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, I will argue that ethical actions should be judged by good will alone. By comparing the theories of Immanuel Kant and John Stuart Mill, I will conclude that Kant’s theories are more realistic in regards to the nature of humans. Immanuel Kant argues that one’s good intentions should be the deciding factor in judging their actions no matter the outcome. What is beneficial about this is that it allows for the expression of the intrinsic values of a person. Since every person has different virtues and opinions, they can act in any way they choose.…

    • 1510 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Kant’s theory of good will could say we should not base our actions off of what produces the most utility for ourselves in fact we should not even focus on ourselves we should focus on the moral duty that we all have. We could hate doing our moral duties; however, it is our moral duty to complete these…

    • 1310 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant believed that the moral worth of an action depends solely on the motive of the action and that the supreme principle of morality is the categorical imperative. Now, consider that a man named Jones is terminally ill with only a week to live and his last week will be full of pain and misery. However, Jones, his family, and his physicians all agree that a drug-induced, painless death would be preferable; Jones just has to determine if an induced death is morally permissible. In order to do this Jones’, his family and his physicians must test their action as a categorical imperative by using Kant’s Universal Law, Law of Nature, and Humanity Formulation.…

    • 1363 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Kant explains that developing a “metaphysics of morals” help us gain a clear understanding of moral principles to align them with our moral duties. Kant argues moral principles are not based on factors such as circumstances, needs, and desires; they derive from a priori concepts. He makes the claims that actions are considered moral if they are performed without underlying motives, not on the basis of consequences, and not based out of mere duty. Kant is not a consequentialist and thinks intentions behind an action determines if it is good or bad. This is interrelated with the concept of good will.…

    • 1649 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant’s theory is based on the moral law and duty as an action that should be treated respectfully. By ‘moral dilemma’ we understand the heart-wrenching decision that carries strong intuitive and emotional weight and can lead to a failure of duty (Garlikov 2). This action is influenced by the individual’s desire to act within the principles of the duty. Immanuel Kant explains that an individual can only do the right thing for the right reason, even though acting on duty is not always sufficient, as it can lead a person to do the right thing for the wrong reason. Acting from duty is the only justification what makes this law absolute and universal.…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant's Moral Theory Essay

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Kant imposes the idea of the “purity of the will” which expands on the principle that one should act…

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays