Amour Propre Analysis

Great Essays
Amour Propre: the Social and Political Inequalities of Property in Society
In the Second Discourse on Inequality, Jean Jacque Rousseau outlined the origin and development of private property. The formation of the hut was the first step towards the ultimate creation of society as families and communities formed. Unlike savage man who’s primary motivation was self-preservation, civilized man embraced amour propre as he started to compare his strengths and abilities to others. Although Rousseau argued that the invention of private property was not natural, it was inevitable as it became a necessity as a consequence of certain circumstances, such as metallurgy and agriculture. Furthermore, the inequalities of property established a division between
…show more content…
In the process of developing private property, man discovered tools and utilized those tools in order to create a hut. The structure of this hut led to cohabitation among men and women. Afterwards, they started having children and a bond emerged between the mother and father. As a result, this became the first revolution as families were established in this form of property. The arrangements in this small society resulted in women staying at home and men searching for food on behalf of the family. Rousseau adds that the development of gender roles made women more subservient to men and established the first form of social inequality. As men acquired more things, the development of language became a necessity when natural catastrophes forced man to communicate with others and form a relationship. Furthermore, the first village festivals of these communities influenced man to become more self-aware of not only himself, but also of others. Whereas savage man sought self-preservation, civilized man began to embrace the concept of amour propre and sought to compare his abilities to

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Rousseau explains how a reset button is needed for politics at his time because the natural state of man has been compromised by the self-indulgence and dependent nature of politics. After man had strayed from the set of rules laid down by god/nature he was no longer self-sufficient and free but was enslaved by manmade laws that enforced inequality. Rousseau criticizes the idea of property “The first man who, having enclosed a piece of ground, bethought himself of saying 'this is mine ', and found people simple enough to believe him, was the real founder of civil society” (Rousseau). In this statement Rousseau claims that the idea of property is one of the origins of inequality, as man claimed the land as his own and began exploiting nature. Rousseau’s call for a reset button on political ethics is at a disagreement with Machiavelli’s idea, where Machiavelli urges the Prince to recognize and utilize the lapses in human nature.…

    • 1706 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    In this paper I am going to summarize Jean-Jacques Rousseau’s “Discourse on the Origin of Inequality” in which Rousseau theorizes that inequality is not a natural event, but an unfortunate byproduct of modern life. I will then provide a criticism of Rousseau’s argument, focusing on his decision to not discuss the relationship between natural and moral inequality. This criticism will then be countered by a theorized response from Rousseau’s perspective. The general argument presented by Rousseau is that the establishment of civil society and the associated progress of humanity is the underlying cause for the inequality between men.…

    • 1814 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “It’s Not You, It’s Me!” Despite there seems to be a tradition of oppression towards women found in most- if not all- societies. The oppression of women can be traced back into early civilizations, but why? The patriarchal society that is rooted in most countries is a form of inequality, favoring men over women.…

    • 1112 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The essay will conclude that society is both progressive in one sense and yet corrupting in another sense depending upon the extent to which it fosters the positive values of community, and the extent to which it may degenerate if these values are not developed properly. ABSOLUTE FREEDOM, ANOMIE AND ALTRUISM. ABSOLUTE FREEDOM Rousseau’s Social Contract (1762) presents a view of society as corrupting, by describing the ways in which the transition from living freely, to living enslaved by the rules of society decays the virtue of man. Before there was civilisation, people lived peaceful and innocent lives, in which they strove to sustain their own contentment and absolute freedom. In the ‘state of nature’, man was free to do as he wished,…

    • 2119 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Starting off, they each had a distinctive understanding of human nature from one another. To Rousseau, humans in primitive times were "noble savages" and it is "civilization" that turned man into a "beast". Conversely, Hobbes believed that being "civilized" is a positive trait and being uncivilized or a "savage" is bad. Concerning human nature, Rousseau theorized that humans were innately good and generous, before being corrupted by the vices of civilization. Human life was most likely peaceful and compassionate as described in his opening line, “Man is born free, and everywhere he is in chains.”…

    • 1051 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Love Command Analysis

    • 1647 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Love Commands by Scott Foster When you want a man to truly fall in love…there are a few things you must make him feel. Love is a sweet spot that makes us true to who we are. It can transform our world. You can get to the root of this game and begin to feel the right vibes once you find out how to make your dream man fall in love and stay with you forever. Once you learn a few experiences that you can use to keep and make a man love you; you will never have a season where you are out of love…NEVER!…

    • 1647 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    John Locke and Jean-Jacque Rousseau present themselves as very distinct philosophers. They both use similar terms, such as, the State of Nature, but conceptualize them differently. In my paper, I will argue that Locke’s argument on his proposed state of nature and civil society is more realistic in our working society than Rousseau’s theory. At the core of their theories, Locke and Rousseau both agree that we all begin in a State of Nature in that everyone should be “equal one amongst another without subordination or subjection,” in which we are free with no government or laws to guide one’s behavior.…

    • 1297 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The first revolution focused on man using resources and tools to create the hut and eventually a family. As technology developed, humans altered their behavior and adapted to a new environment with more defining gender roles that not only made women more subservient men, but also promoted social inequality. Unlike savage man who dedicated his time to either searching for food or sleeping, civilized man had more leisure time as the tasks that savage man once undertook were now being shared among men and women. Dancing and celebrations at village festivals allowed individuals to interact with one another, however that led to the inevitable embrace of amour propre. While savage man only cared about self-preservation, civilized man started to compare himself to others and sought the approval what others thought of him.…

    • 1622 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    The idea of freedom in Jean Jacque Rousseau’s The Social Contract (1762) is present throughout the book and Rousseau’s own, personal understanding of freedom underpins his argument for his ideal state. In this essay I will argue that individual citizens aren’t truly free in every sense in Rousseau’s state as the sovereign has complete dominion over public matters and due to the sovereign explicitly being composed of every citizen, this could lead to nearly every problem being deemed within the public realm. Furthermore, one cannot be individually free, in my opinion, when one cannot voice dissent against the prevailing convention of society, as is the case in Rousseau’s state. To argue this thesis effectively I will explore what freedom means…

    • 2188 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Contracts Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Charles W. Mills have identified parts of our society that have formed sorts of informal contracts about how society sees the world. In Rousseau’s The Social Contract, the first societies are discussed with the colonization of the new world. The differences in the civilization of the people and their subsequent treatment is examined. In Mills’ The Racial Contract, the treatment of different races is examined and historical reason for it is given.…

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Where Is The Love Analysis

    • 1125 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Love is an intense feeling an aspect in everyone’s life, but what is it? Where is it? These are two questions that have often been asked, and have been asked in the song Where is the Love? by The Black-Eyed Peas.…

    • 1125 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    “Equality disappeared, property was introduced (Rousseau 9)”. Rousseau genuinely possessed empathy for the health, happiness, and labor of “good men” while Machiavelli did…

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Both Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Karl Marx share the political and economical ideology that private property separates society into classes, and creates oppression. However, the two view property in different regards. Rousseau views property in a more political view, while Marx focuses more on the economic sphere of property and society. This paper will first state Rousseau and his critique of property, inequality, and the emergence of society found in The Discourses. Then, it will contrast the political critique of Rousseau with that of Karl Marx’s economic critique regarding property, and include other critical parts of Marx’s work including the Jewish Question and the Communist Manifesto.…

    • 1114 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rousseau criticizes the state of nature described by Hobbes; instead of a constant state of fear, Rousseau described it as equality and happiness. Through the passage of time, the state of nature started to disappear as small communities formed, here man started to make comparisons to one another as class divisions developed. For Rousseau private property was a drastic change because communities went away from a simple state to one that consisted of greed and rivalry. Disapproving of Hobbes, who argued that people surrendered rights to an overall “ruler”, Rousseau believed people surrendered their rights to each other, in other words the community. For Rousseau, modern civilization took away the good parts of the early societies and replaced it with a society revolved around the state.…

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Routine Subsistence Tasks Of The Neolithic

    • 2055 Words
    • 9 Pages
    • 3 Works Cited

    Even a simple plough was nearly impossible for one person to manage. Working a plough required two people, one to pull, and one to steer. When large domesticated animals were readily available, they were put to use pulling the plough. This made the task of farming to dangerous to involve women with small children and led to agriculture being a male domain. In a cooperative hunter-gatherer society, men are dependent on the activities of the women.…

    • 2055 Words
    • 9 Pages
    • 3 Works Cited
    Great Essays