The consistent use of rhetorical questions by Amar not only allowed him to provide his insight, but it also forced the reader to answer these questions for themselves allowing them to grow in their understanding of the Constitution. The only thing that seemed to weaken Amar’s argument was the fact that on occasion, the book grew a slightly boring mainly because of the overwhelming amount of information that Amar presented. With that being said Amar did provide a staggering amount of varying facts and reasoning to support his claims. The reason that this information was especially effective seemed to be due to the varying nature of the way Amar presented. The information came in the form of quotes from politicians of the time, excerpts from documents, historical background, and an incredible amount of other sources that Amar successfully drew
The consistent use of rhetorical questions by Amar not only allowed him to provide his insight, but it also forced the reader to answer these questions for themselves allowing them to grow in their understanding of the Constitution. The only thing that seemed to weaken Amar’s argument was the fact that on occasion, the book grew a slightly boring mainly because of the overwhelming amount of information that Amar presented. With that being said Amar did provide a staggering amount of varying facts and reasoning to support his claims. The reason that this information was especially effective seemed to be due to the varying nature of the way Amar presented. The information came in the form of quotes from politicians of the time, excerpts from documents, historical background, and an incredible amount of other sources that Amar successfully drew