George William Curtis Argument Analysis

This source is a quote written by American writer and activist George William Curtis. It discusses the overwhelming idea that geographical areas do not define distinction of a country; What defines a country is the love and passion one has towards it. This idea to him, is the foundation to a nation. The nationalist perspective of this source provided by George has an acquired bias towards a patriotic perspective. In only a short phrase, he is able to embody the devotion one has for their nation which sets the tone and perspective of the quote. Mr. Curtis believes that collective-determination is the building blocks to a sturdy nation, and enables a group to consider themselves as a collective. Although he is displaying Patriotism, his perspective is that it doesn’t matter where you live, or where you come from.Sharing similar values, beliefs, and respecting the choices of others is what embodies a civic and patriotic nation. One who would advocate this source would be Justin Trudeau, the current Prime Minister of Canada. He believes that race, gender, and religion are factors that define a person, but loyalty to our nation and our way of living is what makes our nation strong. By following a similar platform and shared beliefs, we are able to live in harmony with each other …show more content…
Although quite opposite, they also have similar supporting ideas. Both nationalists use the umbrella idea of patriotism towards their nation as described, but their beliefs and values vary. In source one as it says, “A man’s country… is a principle,” that can be seen in source two as “Quebeckers see their province as distinct and having little in common with the rest of the country.” When nationalism is described on such a big stage like this, there are a variety of answers to be said when the question of ‘what is nationalism to you?’ is