An authority of the Smithsonian said that both Monochromic and polychromic perspectives have their advantages. “Fast isn’t always best; nor is slow.” So do not exist a superior culture than another.
Polychromic cultures like to do multiple things at the same time. The fact that they can be easily distracted, but they also tend to manage interruptions well with a willingness to change plans often and easily. They are mare easygoing and can manage better situations not planned in their schedules.
Polychronic individuals are more flexible about time schedules and they have no problem integrating task-oriented activities with socio-emotional ones. For them, maintaining relationships and socializing are more important than accomplishing tasks. These individuals usually see time in the present, when many events may happen at once. Issues such as promptness are firmly based on the relationship rather than the task and objectives …show more content…
In their ordering of things, priority is given to the relative thrill or significance of each meeting.
On the contrary Monochronic cultures think more about money, they have the think of “ you have to make money, otherwise you are nobody. If you have 40 years of earning capacity and you want to make $4 million, that means $100,000 per annum. If you can achieve this in 250 working days, that comes to $400 a day or $50 an hour, so their time costs $50 an hour.” Monochronic cultures are very punctual and like to do one thing per time in a schedule well determined, which include the future goals.
Do one task per time is clearly more efficientily, but have some desavantagens in being part of monochromic culture, they are very stressed and unhappy, their human relashionchips have problems and they can not think fast in a sulutions for a problems that may can be a occur in their thigh schedule, one simple problem can made they stop to work and compromise the their wholly
Polychromic cultures like to do multiple things at the same time. The fact that they can be easily distracted, but they also tend to manage interruptions well with a willingness to change plans often and easily. They are mare easygoing and can manage better situations not planned in their schedules.
Polychronic individuals are more flexible about time schedules and they have no problem integrating task-oriented activities with socio-emotional ones. For them, maintaining relationships and socializing are more important than accomplishing tasks. These individuals usually see time in the present, when many events may happen at once. Issues such as promptness are firmly based on the relationship rather than the task and objectives …show more content…
In their ordering of things, priority is given to the relative thrill or significance of each meeting.
On the contrary Monochronic cultures think more about money, they have the think of “ you have to make money, otherwise you are nobody. If you have 40 years of earning capacity and you want to make $4 million, that means $100,000 per annum. If you can achieve this in 250 working days, that comes to $400 a day or $50 an hour, so their time costs $50 an hour.” Monochronic cultures are very punctual and like to do one thing per time in a schedule well determined, which include the future goals.
Do one task per time is clearly more efficientily, but have some desavantagens in being part of monochromic culture, they are very stressed and unhappy, their human relashionchips have problems and they can not think fast in a sulutions for a problems that may can be a occur in their thigh schedule, one simple problem can made they stop to work and compromise the their wholly