American Indians Allotment Case

Improved Essays
Background Fighting between American Indians and settlers began almost immediately after settlers settled in the New World. As time went on Americans needed more land to accommodate the growing populations, in turn they pushed the American Indians out farther west. However, after the Revolution was won miners, settlers, and cattle ranches became interested in the Indian lands. Chiefs did not give up their land therefore instigating bloody conflicts and the creation of reservations. After Indian wars, congress introduced the Dawes Act and it passed in 1887. This act would dissolve reservations and give American Indians their own lands to farm. Americans believed that this would help the American Indians assimilate more to white ways. In addition to farming, American Indians could sell the remaining land they did …show more content…
Supporters of allotment believed that it would decrease the violence between the two groups. The selling of unused land would help farmers not to impede on the Indian lands and both groups would not murder each other. However, many were afraid that if the bill was not passed Indians would become extinct due to America’s expansion. Dawes ensured that the “allotment bill would ensure that the Indians had enough land to survive.” The hope of assimilation was also a key component in the case for allotment. Settlers believed that because of how big America had grown there was not a way to be apart from American society, thus they would go extinct if they did not abandon their reservations and start a new life. Other settlers mentioned that the buffalo were going extinct, therefore no Indian could live off of hunting anymore, but instead work on a farm that would give them an increased work ethic and sense of pride. Not only would the Indians pride increase, but the end of government handouts would disappear, saving the government

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    For this essay, I will be examining the Dawes Act, the Homestead Act, and the Morrill Act. The Dawes Act, Homestead Act, and the Morrill all have similar aspects in them. During this essay, a comparison will be made between all three of these acts. Also, each act has different principles that are important to its fundamentals. Those different principles will be examined also.…

    • 922 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dawes Act Dbq Analysis

    • 404 Words
    • 2 Pages

    On February 8, 1887, Congress passed the Dawes Act as a solution to the "Indian Problem." Congress saw this conflict similar to Americans Richard H. Pratt and Carl Schurz, who noticed the Westward Expansion campaign had become an invasion for Native Americans. Both men believed the Natives must integrate into western society, that they must "individualize them in the possession and appreciation of property," Schurz claimed. Mr. Pratt had seen the harsh conditions of Native reservations himself and concluded they were in desperate need of education. Together with other Indian reformers, Pratt pushed Congress to feed Great Plains Native Americans into American Indian schools, where they would "kill the Indian, save the man.…

    • 404 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dawes Act Dbq

    • 362 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The event that most affectedly brought the end to the Indian Wars against the United States Army, is when the Congress passed the Dawes Act. Due to many arguments facing the government, like, the concept that many reformers inferred about the dream of conforming the Indians into a piece of the white culture. The Dawes Act, divided reservations into around 160 acres per family to live in, where the remainder of land would be given to the surrounding white settlements. Although, the Dawes Act seemed like a great benefit for the Indians, this could not always be considered true.…

    • 362 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Dawes Severalty Act which is also known as the General Allotment Act was passed on February 8, 1887 by Congress and signed my President Grover Cleveland. Congress stated the goals of the Act, “were simple and clear cut: to extinguish tribal sovereignty, erase reservation boundaries, and force the assimilation of Indians into the society at large.” The Act required Native Americans to be give up their land and be relocated in return for individual land grants. The Dawes Act divided Indian reservations into smaller sections allowing more protection for the United States over Indian territories. The goal of dividing up the reservations were to help Native Americans integrate into American society and create independent landholders which would cause tribes to break up and become more independent.…

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    How did the American government shift from an “expansion with honor” policy to a policy of the expulsion of the Cherokee people? The Cherokee people were once a great nation whose population spanned all across the South Eastern corners of the North American continent. The Cherokee people once called states such as North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, Tennessee, Alabama, Kentucky, and Virginia home. The Cherokee people once governed their own nation, a nation where men hunted and women farmed. A nation where both men and women worked together in harmony as a balance for each other, an equilibrium.…

    • 1495 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    At the time, President Arthur felt that the nagging Indian problem could be resolved by “introducing to the Indians the customs and pursuits of civilized life and gradually to absorb them into the mass of our citizens. ” Congress would respond to Arthurs Indian policy by coming up with the Coke Act of 1883, but would soon fail to receive majority support of the Senate. The General Allotment Act would remain and be commonly known as the Dawes Act. A period of 25 years would be established during which the Indian owner of the property was expected to learn proper business practices and once…

    • 561 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    How can hospitality be expected by a guest who barges in and demands to take control? If hospitality is present in such situations, it will prove to be destructive. Similarly, when European explorers entered the New World, they discovered Native Americans, who had already been living in the Americas for several centuries. Undoubtedly, these indigenous people’s lifestyles were influenced by the climate, resources, and geography of this land. As the European explorers began to settle in the New World, the Federal Government played a major role in not only the Europeans’ lives but also the Native Americans’ lives.…

    • 1041 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    By the 1850s the U.S. government had new plans to exert control over the Natives expandtion. The Dawes Act of 1887 was adopted by the U.S. congress in 1887, gave the president the right to survey American Indian tribal land. They divided the land into allotments for individauls Indians. The goal for the act was to get the Indians to accept the allotment and live away for their tribal, and in return those who did would be granted United States citizenship. The act was named after Henry Laurens Dawes, a senator in Massachusetts.…

    • 1124 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During 1865-1900’s, Western Expansion caused major impacts on the Natives Americans and European Americans. Natives were slowly being wiped out due to the powerful challenges caused by the colonist and the conflict between cultural arrogance such as the natives being primitive and the European Americans thought of being superior. It causes cultural issues that led to Reservation Systems which the U.S. Government forced Native Americans tribes to live in certain areas. This act caused rebellious plans such as the Dakota Sioux Uprising of 1862, the Dawes Act of 1887 and Geronimo. Another major conflict were the issues with land, trade, medicine and cultural differences such as the Ghost Dance, even though some Natives accepted the Treaty Process,…

    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Indian Removal Act, which was passed by Congress in 1830, completely changed the path for the future in multiple aspects. In determining what impact this event still has on our country today, one must start by analyzing the relationships between Native Americans, the United States government, and the common white settler. Additionally, one must analyze how the removal of these tribes affected not only them, but the white settlers. Socially, Native Americans were viewed as no more than objects in the way of what the Americans viewed as rightfully theirs.…

    • 1566 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    economic policies towards the Native tribes by purchasing more Native land and making a profit out of it. On December 18, 1829, in a speech to Congress, Andrew Jackson stated, “...we have at the same time lost no opportunity to purchase their lands and thrust them farther into the wilderness...”. Before the Indian Removal Act, the U.S. obviously wanted more land. They conjured treaties, laws, and policies just to gain land. When the Americans arrived, they had one clear goal, to get land.…

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Indian Removal Act was passed by Congress in 1830 during the presidency of Andrew Jackson. The Act was the first major law that Jackson enforced. It stated that the president could relocate the newly civilized Native Americans west of the Mississippi River while the Americans could have control over the land that the Native Americans had previously occupied in Georgia and Florida. Although the removal of Native Americans was supposed to be done fairly, Andrew Jackson and his government ignored the law in order to get more benefits from the situation. The five main tribes that were relocated were the Cherokee, Seminole Choctaw, Chickasaw, and Creek tribes.…

    • 1057 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout world history, countless groups of people from different ethnicities and cultures have befallen to the trap of institutionalized slavery. From the beginnings of colonial America, European settlers have enslaved both the indigenous people and also Africans. When the general subject of slavery is discussed, people assume this refers to the 13 million Africans that were transported to the America, as part of the “Triangular Slave Trade” (Ojibwa). The massive, historical representation of African slaves disregards many other racial groups that were subjected to this dehumanizing treatment. Although, Africans did endure the harsh enslavement by their European owners for approximately 300 years, slavery in America began long before this.…

    • 1539 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To understand what exactly led to the eventual fighting between the Native Americans and European settlers, one must first learn the cultural differences between them. While, some Native American’s learned to “coexist” with new foreign settlers trading and interacting with them, other natives did not like these invaders and were eventually destroyed, usually by force. These new Europeans tried to bring their new way of life to the natives while these people just wanted to maintain their traditional and natural way of life. Native Americans wanted to live for their family, religion and becoming one with nature. They believed that all things were connected spiritually and that their actions could directly influence nature around them.…

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The natives land was constantly being settled on, their livestock stolen, even their villages burned to the ground by the European American Settlers. By signing with the Indian Removal Act, the indigenous peoples were given an opportunity to get away from the violence and discrimination of the settlers. The Indian Removal Act gave the Native Americans a means of survival, thus benefitting the Native Americans and saving many lives that may have been lost on both the European American and the Native American sides had the Native Americans remained on their homeland.            The Native American Tribes were offered land west of the Mississippi River that they would have total sovereignty over. President Andrew Jackson was given the legal right by the Indian Removal Policy to grant the land west of the Mississippi River to the Native Americans for them alone to govern over to the tribes that did agree to give up their ancestral homelands. Most of the European American population believed that America would never expand beyond the Mississippi River, so the Native American Tribes would be safe from the settlers heading west to create their homes on the new…

    • 1408 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays