American Democracy In Peril Hudson Analysis

Improved Essays
: In Chapter One of American Democracy in Peril, Hudson states several governmental issues, describes where these issues are derived from, and offers solutions to boost effective management of our government. Hudson’s critique of the U.S. government leaves the reader pondering the reason behind our government’s shortcomings. At first, his use of historic reference within the branches of government seem unnecessarily detailed and redundant but through progressive reading it becomes clear how crucial the details are when describing the evolution of our government. Hudson relates to the feeling of powerlessness as a U.S. citizen and gives off a feeling of understanding through text. He describes the government as “Pandora’s Box” and offers a way out of this seemingly endless age of ineffective governing. The author seems to have very Liberal views and also seems to really stand for average citizens’ needs within the U.S.
Hudson calls out the U.S. government on its stalemate of power
…show more content…
One solution is educating voters more on their party’s views opposed to their official’s views mostly. He also indirectly talks about rewriting the Constitution due to its outdated content and context. Rewriting the Constitution seems to be his most drastic idea but is also the most effective and efficient way to go about reformation of the flawed U.S. government. The problem with his drastic solution is the reaction of people. Change is not something welcomed in general society. There would be negative consequences carried out due to this drastic approach if it were acted upon. In the long run, drastic action could cure the government of its issues but is it really worth the cost of a second Civil War? Government officials have probably contemplated drastic action but froze at the thought of a rebellion being forged from the stubborn minds of citizens who do not see the next big step to true

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Frenchman Alexis De Tocqueville was very interested in American society and democracy. In his book, Democracy in America, he sets an appreciative tone but simultaneously criticizes American democracy. He views democracy as a complete balance between freedom and equality, however, this balance is not sturdy enough. Tocqueville notices both political and social issues that inevitable will emerge and some that have emerged. He takes on Americans who have isolated themselves and their obsession with consumerism.…

    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In the midst of the Progressive Era, there were reforms and regulations to make society better for all, and not only the wealthy class. But the Lochner case showed that the Supreme Court did not like having government interfering in businesses with economic regulation (Kens 129). Kens discusses this dilemma in a new era in American legal history known as the Lochner era. The Supreme Court decisions during this period went against the tide of the country that wanted social reforms. Even President Roosevelt, a famed Progressive reformer disliked the Supreme Court ideology.…

    • 2319 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Tribe and Dorf start off their paper talking about the purpose of the Constitution. They believe that at its very essence, the purpose is to create a balance of sorts between individual liberty and the use the government to help society accomplish everything it must. The scariest part about this, is that we must rely upon the people to run the government. History has shown that man is not always reliable, which is why the Constitution puts forth some “auxiliary precautions”. Also known as the Bill of Rights, these precautions were not something that was completely agreed upon at first.…

    • 520 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Acemoglu and Robinson believed economic success developed from the government became accountable for the citizens, which is due to a central government. I feel as though these two authors take on the position of federalists under the Constitution. They saw that the states having control wasn’t the best option, especially when it came to benefiting the people. Both authors would understand that a decentralized government was causing failure to the nation. I believe they would agree with Madison and Washington very much especially on the points that the Articles of Confederation was a complete failure and that we needed a new system to follow.…

    • 1031 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Populism And Democracy

    • 1513 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Populism appears when there is tension between the redemptive face and pragmatic face or more simply when governments promises don’t match their delivery or when peoples demands don’t get legislated for, normally during a crisis or a doctor’s mandate (change to governments manifesto due to changing affairs). In crisis non- experts (populist leaders) shouldn’t be in government because populists have simple solutions to complex situations. For example, Trumps solution to illegal immigration along a 2650km boarder is to build a wall. Such simple solutions in practice don’t work and can damage a well-functioning democracy. Governments should be pragmatic to negotiate unpredictable situations; and this isn’t always breaking promises undermining populists because populists always say that broken promises or crisis are due to the political elites breaking promises to further their own goals.…

    • 1513 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Conservatism

    • 1365 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Over the past centuries the American people evolve their own ideas and have expanded their views on the government from holding them back. Which makes you think that Conservatism is incompatible with democracy. Conservatism is founded on deception because of its prejudice and inequality, which makes it to be a destructive system to the Untied States. I think the solution to get past the idea is that the government needs to stop whining with one another and figure out how to make the Unites States a stronger country. I like the idea of John Stuart Mill (1899) that the power of the government should only be used is if there is harm coming to an individual.…

    • 1365 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This type of leadership provided calls to action to better our nation like Franklin D. Roosevelt's “all we have to fear is fear itself “. My last disagreement stems from the idea that we are past the point of change. I can see how the rhetoric of candidates and presidents alike can be dangerous to the our nation as misrepresentations of what the public really thinks. I do agree with these authors on that point after witnessing the televised drama of the 2016 election as well as the 180 character social media posts made by not only by our current president but other candidates in the 2016 election including…

    • 966 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Wallis observed that “once independent, Americans worried continuously about their governments and how to design their political institutions to limit corruption” (Wallis 24). When creating a new government, the Framers obsessed over the inevitability of corruption. They surrendered to the fact that corruption cannot be made to vanish, instead realizing that its danger can be limited by legal structure and civic virtue. From the failures of France and Britain, the Framers came to the conclusion that no single form of government was superior. Instead, the appropriate structure of government would need to regularly inhibit any deviations from civic…

    • 1420 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The American state has become an overly complex bureaucracy. The myriad of checkpoints needed to go through in order to get anything done dissuades citizens from participating actively in politics. And participatory governance being a crucial aspect of a prospering democracy makes the problem of kludgeocracy ever the more pressing. The inevitability of this has its roots in the founding fathers’ concern over the limits of a central government and the responsibilities a truly representative democracy should have. Their pragmatism has shielded the American people from many of the overreaches a government can impose on its citizenry, but at the price of turning our government into a kind of a labyrinth.…

    • 1331 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This government provides an ideal balance between personal rights and federal power. Terrorists and white supremacy groups such as the KKK reject the values of equality and cause conflicts while attempting to revoke the rights of many Americans. But this dissent is ultimately defeated in the face of a solidified political structure.. Government has an obligation to enforce the rights of all people, meaning that dissenters now have less influence on democracy. Dissent can still cause discord, but because today’s federal government has much more power and stability than its early American counterpart, dissenters are now unable to seriously threaten American…

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays