This goes hand in hand with scholarly research article “Emotions and Actions Associated with Norm-Breaking Events” by David Sloan Wilson and Rick O'Gorman. In this article, Wilson and O’Gorman examined the various ways people cope with the breaking of social norms. In their study they found that when coping with a social norm people tended to believe that going in the situation would have been more negative or less positive, but all the conceptions were not accurate. In the text Wilson and O’Gorman stated, “Just as emotions are expected to be (roughly) adaptive for the person experiencing the emotions, beliefs about others should be (roughly) adaptive for the believer. However, the most adaptive beliefs are not necessarily accurate.” (Wilson and O'Gorman, 297) This is relevant to the studies because after both studies saw that I was breaking a norm they assessed the reasoning behind it and came up with inaccurate conclusions. One inferred that I was upset or uninterested while the others inferred I was not well or something was wrong. Although they were all using life experiences to interpret the abnormality they were all incorrect because I was neither upset or uninterested, or not feeling well during the time of the
This goes hand in hand with scholarly research article “Emotions and Actions Associated with Norm-Breaking Events” by David Sloan Wilson and Rick O'Gorman. In this article, Wilson and O’Gorman examined the various ways people cope with the breaking of social norms. In their study they found that when coping with a social norm people tended to believe that going in the situation would have been more negative or less positive, but all the conceptions were not accurate. In the text Wilson and O’Gorman stated, “Just as emotions are expected to be (roughly) adaptive for the person experiencing the emotions, beliefs about others should be (roughly) adaptive for the believer. However, the most adaptive beliefs are not necessarily accurate.” (Wilson and O'Gorman, 297) This is relevant to the studies because after both studies saw that I was breaking a norm they assessed the reasoning behind it and came up with inaccurate conclusions. One inferred that I was upset or uninterested while the others inferred I was not well or something was wrong. Although they were all using life experiences to interpret the abnormality they were all incorrect because I was neither upset or uninterested, or not feeling well during the time of the